2013.09.10 16:28 Cuervoso Their last resort
2018.09.10 21:31 ix0WXOeip4V6 YOU: Netflix Original Series
2016.05.12 01:40 Dorkside The Good Place
2023.06.07 15:11 flexonyall-tiktok Watching Jack’s Reddit video on internet explorer (the joke is I’m 2 months late to the trend)
![]() | submitted by flexonyall-tiktok to JackSucksAtLife [link] [comments] |
2023.06.07 15:00 LordRavenholm TOS, 2x13, The Trouble with Tribbles
2023.06.07 15:00 AthleticsBot Game Chat: Athletics @ Pirates - 09:35 AM PDT
ALW Rank | Team | W | L | GB (E#) | WC Rank | WC GB (E#) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Texas Rangers | 40 | 20 | - (-) | - | - (-) |
2 | Houston Astros | 36 | 25 | 4.5 (98) | 2 | +0.5 (-) |
3 | Los Angeles Angels | 32 | 30 | 9.0 (93) | 5 | 4.0 (97) |
4 | Seattle Mariners | 30 | 30 | 10.0 (93) | 7 | 5.0 (97) |
5 | Oakland Athletics | 13 | 50 | 28.5 (73) | 12 | 23.5 (77) |
Probable Pitcher (Season Stats) | Report | |
---|---|---|
Athletics | Hogan Harris (0-0, 6.97 ERA, 10.1 IP) | No report posted. |
Pirates | Roansy Contreras (3-4, 4.82 ERA, 56.0 IP) | No report posted. |
2023.06.07 14:57 K0k0l0k095 Can't catch a break (spoiler)
2023.06.07 14:52 Aigle13 Few questions regarding post surgery, music festivals and plant vaporizing.
2023.06.07 14:33 AutoLovepon Majutsushi Orphen Hagure Tabi: Seiiki-hen • Sorcerous Stabber Orphen: Doom of Dragon's Sanctuary - Episode 9 discussion
Episode | Link | Score |
---|---|---|
1 | Link | ---- |
2 | Link | ---- |
3 | Link | ---- |
4 | Link | ---- |
5 | Link | 1.0 |
6 | Link | 5.0 |
7 | Link | 5.0 |
8 | Link | ---- |
9 | Link | ---- |
2023.06.07 14:26 NoblestOfTigers A numerical ranking of how optimistic each fanbase should be about their team, based on 8 metrics.
Last WS App. (# yrs) | Pts | LCS App's last 10 Yrs | Pts | Last 100-win Season (# yrs) | Pts | MVP/CY/ROY winners last 10 | Pts | Last Playoff Series Win (# yrs) | Pts | # Playoff App's last 10 | Pts | Winning Seasons Last 10 | Pts | Last Winning Season (# yrs) | Pts | TOTAL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tampa Bay Rays | 3 | 8.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 5.00 | 3 | 7.0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 10.0 | 64.63 |
Baltimore Orioles | 40 | -5.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 10.0 | 14.58 |
New York Yankees | 14 | 0.0 | 3 | 5.00 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 3.33 | 1 | 10.0 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10.0 | 65.42 |
Toronto Blue Jays | 30 | -3.0 | 2 | 3.33 | never | -1 | 2 | 3.33 | 7 | 1.1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 10.0 | 29.73 |
Boston Red Sox | 5 | 6.0 | 3 | 5.00 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3.33 | 2 | 8.5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 7.5 | 59.19 |
Minnesota Twins | 32 | -3.2 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | 21 | 0.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0.0 | 12.25 |
Detroit Tigers | 11 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 39 | 0 | 3 | 5.00 | 10 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0.0 | 14.58 |
Chicago White Sox | 18 | -1.3 | 0 | 0.00 | 106 | -1 | 2 | 3.33 | 18 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10.0 | 18.79 |
Kansas City Royals | 8 | 3.0 | 2 | 3.33 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 8 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0.0 | 14.17 |
Cleveland Guardians | 7 | 4.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5.00 | 1 | 10.0 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 10.0 | 63.33 |
Houston Astros | 1 | 10.0 | 6 | 10.00 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 10.00 | 1 | 10.0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 10.0 | 92.50 |
Oakland Athletics | 33 | -3.4 | 0 | 0.00 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 7.0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 7.5 | 27.68 |
Los Angeles Angels | 21 | -1.2 | 0 | 0.00 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 8.33 | 14 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0.0 | 12.67 |
Seattle Mariners | never | -6.2 | 0 | 0.00 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 3.33 | 1 | 10.0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 10.0 | 28.92 |
Texas Rangers | 12 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.00 | never | -1 | 0 | 0.00 | 12 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0.0 | 5.00 |
Philadelphia Phillies | 1 | 10.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1.67 | 1 | 10.0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10.0 | 45.42 |
New York Mets | 8 | 3.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6.67 | 8 | 0.0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 10.0 | 47.92 |
Atlanta Braves | 2 | 9.0 | 2 | 3.33 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 5.00 | 2 | 8.5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 10.0 | 72.32 |
Washington Nationals | 4 | 7.0 | 1 | 1.67 | never | -1 | 3 | 5.00 | 4 | 5.6 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 0.0 | 36.53 |
Miami Marlins | 20 | -1.0 | 0 | 0.00 | never | -1 | 3 | 5.00 | 3 | 7.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | 18.18 |
St. Louis Cardinals | 10 | 1.0 | 3 | 5.00 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1.67 | 4 | 5.6 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10.0 | 54.03 |
Pittsburgh Pirates | 44 | -5.8 | 0 | 0.00 | 114 | 0 | 2 | 3.33 | 10 | 0.0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0.0 | 5.67 |
Cincinnati Reds | 33 | -3.6 | 0 | 0.00 | 47 | 0 | 2 | 3.33 | 28 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5.0 | 12.17 |
Milwaukee Brewers | 41 | -5.2 | 1 | 1.67 | never | -1 | 3 | 5.00 | 5 | 4.1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 10.0 | 30.68 |
Chicago Cubs | 7 | 4.0 | 3 | 5.00 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5.00 | 6 | 2.6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0.0 | 39.50 |
Arizona Diamondbacks | 22 | -1.4 | 0 | 0.00 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 6 | 2.6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0.0 | 6.50 |
Los Angeles Dodgers | 3 | 8.0 | 6 | 10.00 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 10.00 | 2 | 8.5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10.0 | 95.65 |
San Francisco Giants | 9 | 2.0 | 1 | 1.67 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | 7 | 1.1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 7.5 | 36.61 |
Colorado Rockies | 16 | -0.2 | 0 | 0.00 | never | -1 | 0 | 0.00 | 5 | 4.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0.0 | 8.60 |
San Diego Padres | 25 | -2.0 | 1 | 1.67 | never | -1 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 10.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10.0 | 28.33 |
2023.06.07 14:20 Ok_Cockroach_5227 Community What Ifs?
2023.06.07 14:18 teerexbc Season 5
2023.06.07 14:16 blueySurvey Rate the episode: Easter (S2E52)
2023.06.07 14:09 amariegm Season 3 Wish: An episode for children to watch?
2023.06.07 14:00 RaysBot Game Chat: 6/7 Twins (31-30) @ Rays (44-19) 6:40 PM
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
Twins | Pablo Lopez (3-3, 4.54 ERA) | BSNO | TIBN |
Rays | Shawn Armstrong (0-0, 0.00 ERA) | BSSUN | WDAE, WQBN (ES) |
MLB | Fangraphs | Baseball Savant | Reddit Stream | IRC Chat |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gameday | Game Graph | Strikezone Map | Live Comments | Libera: ##baseball |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | |||||||||
TB | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
2023.06.07 14:00 Blooper_Bot Tailgate Party - Wednesday, June 07
Probable Pitcher (Season Stats) | Report | |
---|---|---|
Mets | Max Scherzer (5-2, 3.21 ERA, 47.2 IP) | No report posted. |
Braves | Charlie Morton (5-6, 3.62 ERA, 64.2 IP) | No report posted. |
NLE Rank | Team | W | L | GB (E#) | WC Rank | WC GB (E#) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Atlanta Braves | 36 | 24 | - (-) | - | - (-) |
2 | Miami Marlins | 34 | 28 | 3.0 (99) | 2 | +1.0 (-) |
3 | New York Mets | 30 | 31 | 6.5 (96) | 5 | 2.5 (100) |
4 | Philadelphia Phillies | 29 | 32 | 7.5 (95) | 6 | 3.5 (99) |
5 | Washington Nationals | 25 | 35 | 11.0 (92) | 11 | 7.0 (96) |
2023.06.07 13:57 68419246 All HTF characters ages (and a stupid theory i have about them) (According to my dumb brain)
2023.06.07 13:53 Ok_Suggestion8386 help w something about actually watching the show please
2023.06.07 13:32 readingrachelx Housewife highlights/Daily shit talk - June 7th, 2023
2023.06.07 13:26 Commercial-Bed-9381 Want to climb out of BRONZE!!!!!!!
2023.06.07 13:18 ReggieBasil LAST MAN STANDING 13 has been won, come and celebrate our champion, /u/suckmynewts!
user | tip |
---|---|
Fattdaddy21 | Wests Tigers |
suckmynewts | Penrith |
users | correct | incorrect | % | eliminated | still alive | with both lives | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 768 | 251 | 403 | 38% | 0 | 768 | 251 |
R2 | 768 | 174 | 411 | 30% | 403 | 365 | 62 |
R3 | 365 | 162 | 120 | 57% | 175 | 190 | 34 |
R4 | 190 | 128 | 39 | 77% | 53 | 137 | 25 |
R5 | 137 | 89 | 42 | 68% | 40 | 97 | 17 |
R6 | 97 | 43 | 54 | 44% | 45 | 52 | 8 |
R7 | 52 | 39 | 9 | 81% | 12 | 40 | 7 |
R8 | 40 | 36 | 4 | 90% | 3 | 37 | 6 |
R9 | 37 | 19 | 18 | 51% | 17 | 20 | 5 |
R10 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45% | 11 | 9 | 1 |
R11 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 9 | 1 |
R12 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33% | 6 | 3 | 0 |
R13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66% | 1 | 2 | 0 |
R14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2023.06.07 13:15 AdditionalWar8759 Give them Lala Podcast: Episode from June 7th, “The One Where Lala CANNOT Relate.”
2023.06.07 13:06 SomeKrazyGuyUKno_v2 Season 16, Episodes 1-3 descriptions from Hulu
![]() | submitted by SomeKrazyGuyUKno_v2 to IASIP [link] [comments] |
2023.06.07 12:52 DreamyDude2004_2 Episode titles are trash, here are more consistent ones:
Original Title | Better Title | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Pilot | PiRick | Pun version of "Pilot". The network probably wouldn't allow this, but still. |
Lawnmower Dog | Lawnmower Mort | The original title references the movie "Lawnmower Man", but my rules say that another pun/variation besides "Rick", "Mort", or "Morty" is not allowed. |
Anatomy Park | MiRickle on Thirty-Mort Street | Same explanation as above. I can't do "JuRicksic Mort" because it will eventually be used in season six. So instead of focusing on the human body stuff, I've focused on the Christmas aspect, and chosen a classic movie. Also, just a note, Miracle on 34th Street is eventually referenced in dialogue in season six as well. |
M. Night Shaym-Aliens | The Rixth Sense | Same explanation as above, once again, but this episode title uses "Aliens" as a pun as well as the name of an actor (M. Night Shyamalan). I instead did a pun on one of the actor's most famous movies, The Sixth Sense. |
Meeseeks and Destroy! | Rick and Destroy | A better pun on the original reference, the song Seek and Destroy. |
Rick Potion #9 | Rick Potion No. 9 | The pun (on the song Love Potion No. 9) still sucks, because there's nothing to work with, but at least the grammar is like the original song name now |
Raising Gazorpazorp | VivaRickum | Pun on Vivariam, a movie about raising an alien |
Rixty Minutes | Interdimensional Cable | First exception to my rules. This title will now align with Interdimensional Cable II: Tempting Fate properly |
Something Ricked This Way Comes | Something Ricked This Way Comes | First one with no issues. |
Close Rick-counters of the Rick Kind | Close Rick-counters of the Rick Kind | No problems again. |
Ricksy Business | Ricksy Business | Yo we're on a streak! |
Original Title | Better Title | Explanation |
---|---|---|
A Rickle in Time | A Rickle in Time | We are on a rooooooooll!!! |
Mortynight Run | Mortnight Rick | Better pun of Midnight Run. We were on a streak guys this is so sad can we get -293 upvotes |
Auto Erotic Assimilation | Hive Mort | The original episode title had no pun and was based on auto-erotic asphyxiation (which was actually seen in Ricksy Business from Squanchy, just a weird coincidence), so I've based the new title on Hive Mind. I bet you can't guess what the movie's about. |
Total Rickall | Total Rickall | There kinda getting the hang of it now!!!! |
Get Schwifty | Mortsic and LyRicks | Based on the movie Music and Lyrics. If I wanted to go further the episode could have been called MortRick and LyRicks but that looks and sounds weird. |
The Ricks Must be Crazy | Rick Gods Mort Be Crazy | Better pun of The Gods Must be Crazy |
Big Trouble in Little Sanchez | The CuRickous Case of BenjaRick Button | Movie about a dude getting younger, like Rick in the episode. The name "Big Trouble in Little Sanchez" (title based on the movie "Big Trouble in Little China") is a pun because the name of the movie has been altered to reference the plot of the episode; but the plot of the actual movie is arbitrary. I have made it to be like the other episodes: so that the pun is on a movie which actually has plot similarity: in this case The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. |
Interdimensional Cable 2: Tempting Fate | Interdimensional Cable 2: Tempting Fate | - |
Look Who's Purging Now | The Purge: Anmorty | The title "Look Who's Purging Now" doesn't follow the format. Made it based on the movie The Purge: Anarchy. Was gonna do "Rick Purge: Amorty" but it would've been completely unrecognizable then. |
The Wedding Squanchers | AmortRickan Wedding | Based on "American Wedding" (2003). First famous wedding movie that came up, which I could work with pun-wise. |
Original Title | Better Title | Explanation |
---|---|---|
The Rickshank Rickedemption | The Shawshank Rickdemption | Better pun of The Shawshank Redemption |
Rickmancing the Stone | Rickmancing the Stone | Follows all the rules already!! |
Pickle Rick | Couples Ricktreat | This movie is about therapy. I would've preferred some bottle-episode-like movie taking place entirely in a therapists office, but this is the best I could get (based on Couples Retreat, only partly about therapy). Getting a movie about the subplot was the only choice because the main plot was so farfetched and unique. |
Vindicators 3: The Return of Worldender | Rickvengers: Age Mort UltRick | The pun (based on Avengers: Age of Ultron) is kind of a stretch, but basing it on The Avengers alone (making it The Rickvengers or Mort Rickvengers) would be too short. |
The Whirly Dirly Conspiracy | Adventrick-land | Based on Adventureland, a movie about a run-down theme park. There wasn't much to go off of, because its such a unique plot, similarly to Pickle Rick. This might actually be why some titles don't attempt an episode pun. |
Rest and Ricklaxation | - | I'm completely stumped. I couldn't find any movie, book, or TV show even remotely similar to any aspect of the plot. |
The Ricklantis Mixup | Ricklantis The Lost Contirick | Based on Atlantis, The Lost Continent. I kept the Atlanatis mislead because it is a very important part of the episode and title. |
Morty's Mind Blowers | Interdimensional Cable 3: Morty's Mind Blowers | To be consistent with the other two episodes. |
The ABCs of Beth | I Mort-ied a Mort-ster from OutRick Space | Again, the original title is likely unique because the plot has never been done before. But I found something kind of similar to the side-plot, a really old movie called I Married a Monster from Outer Space |
The Richchurian Mortydate | The Mortchurian Candirick | Much better pun on The Manchurian Candidate. |
Original Title | Better Title | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Edge of Tomorty: Rick Die Rickpeat | Edge of Tomorty | The original movie is Edge of Tomorrow, and the tagline is "Live Die, Repeat", but it is not needed in the title. |
The Old Man and the Seat | - | Again, another name based on title pun as opposed to the actual plot of the source material. I can't find anything remotely related to any of the three plots, so help me out here. |
One Crew over the Crewcoo's Morty | Ocean's Rickleven | Originally based on One Flew Over the Cucoo's Nest, also purely based on name pun and not plot contents. |
Claw and Hoarder: Special Ricktim's Morty | Rickvanced Dungeons Mort Dragons | Original episode title was bad for a number of reasons. If you get the new reference, you get it, if you don't, you don't. |
Rattlestar Ricklactica | Battlestar Ricklactica | "Rattle" can't be used in place of "Battle", per my rules for a good title. |
Never Ricking Morty | The Nevericking Morty | Better pun of "The Neverending Story". |
The Vat of Acid Episode | The Vat of Acid Episode | Perfect title already, the fact that there is no reference makes it better. |
Childrick of Mort | Childrick of Mort | Perfect pun already (based on Children of Men) |
Star Mort Rickturn of the Jerri | Star Mort: Rickturn of the Jedi | Don't know why the colon wasn't there already. "Jerri" isn't allowed because of my rules blah blah blah |
Original Title | Better Title | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Mort Dinner Rick Andre | Mort Dinner Rick Andre | - |
Mortyplicity | Mortyplicity | - |
A Rickconvenient Mort | A Rickconvenient Mort | A Rickconvenient Truth |
Rickdependence Spray | Rickdependence Day | "Spray" can't be used as a pun... i'm starting to sound like a broken record |
Amortycan Grickfitti | AmortRickan Grickfitti | A better pun of "American Grafitti" |
Rick & Morty's Thanksploitation Spectacular | A Morty Brown Thanksricking | Based on "A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving". To my knowledge, this is a very famous Thanksgiving movie, but I wouldn't properly know; there might be a better one. Tell me in the replies if there is. |
Gotron Jerrysis Rickvangelion | Morton Gene-rick Evangelion | Improved pun on "Neon Genesis Evangelion". |
Rickternal Friendshine of the Spotless Mort | Rickternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mort | "Friendshine" can't be used because BLAH BLAH BLAH YOU ALREASDY KNOWEWFRGHTIUJ3Q |
Forgetting Sarick Mortshall | Forgetting SaRick Mortshall | Good, but the pun isn't obvious, so the "r" should be capitalised as shown |
Rickmurai Jack | SamuRick Jack | MUCH better pun based on "Samurai Jack". IT WAS RIGHT THERE GUYS. |
Original Title | Better Title | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Solaricks | Solaricks | THEY DID IT!! |
Rick: A Mort Well Lived | Rick Free Mort Die Hard | Based on "Live Free or Die Hard", because the original title casually breaks all the god-dang rules |
Bethic Twinstinct | BasRick Instinct | Better pun on "Basic Instinct". Tell me if the original movie is even related to the plot cause I have no idea and plot descriptions can be misleading. |
Night Family | Night Gallerick | Better pun of "Night Gallery" AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA THIS PAIN IS ALMOST OVER REPEATING THE SMAE JRTHING OVEVR OVER OVER OVER O VOER OVEOR OVEOR OVEOR OVOEVOR OOVEOROVOE OVOER |
Final DeSmithation | Final DestRickation | ALMOST THERE |
JuRicksic Mort | JuRicksic Mort | no complaints also ALMOST THEEEEEERE |
Analyze This | - | Again, this plot is so unique there's no movie I can reference. Comment if you know one. also ALMOST THERE SO CLOSE SO CLOSE SO CLOSE |
A Rick in King Morur's Mort | A Rick in King Arthur's Mort | better pun on "A Kid in King Arthur's Court'" ONE MORE ONE MORE SO CLOSE SO CLOSE |
Ricktional Mortpoon's Rickmas Mortcation | Natrickal Lampoon's Rickmas Vacation | YEEEEYEYYEYEYEYEYEYEYEYEYS PAIN ENDED YES LETS GOOOOOOOOOOO |
2023.06.07 12:11 FyrestarOmega Lucy Letby Trial, Defence Day 12, 7 June, 2023
The trial is now resuming, with the 12 members of the jury in attendance.
Nicholas Johnson KC is continuing to cross-examine Lucy Letby, turning to the case of Child M.
Letby confirms there is nothing she wishes to change in her evidence given in cross-examination so far.
Now the prosecution turns to his twin, Child M, who was also allegedly attacked by Letby - this time having air injected. He survived but was left brain-damaged.Chester Standard:
Mr Johnson says for Child M, Letby - in her defence statement - said Child M 'was slotted into a space' in nursery room 1 which was 'full'.
Child M was 'apnoeic', and it was not known if he had a desaturation.
A crash call was put out, and Child M was turned around in an incubator by a nursing colleague, to get him on to a monitor.
Letby added she did not notice any skin colour changes in Child M at the time.
Letby said in her statement she had written notes on Child M's resuscitation on a paper towel which ended up in her pocket and were taken home with her. Sky News:
Letby tells the court it would have been used to write up [nursing] notes.
Letby says Child L and Child M 'stood out' in her mind at the time, as they were the first twins delivered where she was the allocated nurse.
Child M was born in "good condition" and was breathing by himself. He had his observations taken every two hours. Chester Standard:
Letby agrees this was the case.
"He was not an intensive care baby, was he?" Mr Johnson asks.
"No, I don't believe he was at this time," Letby says.
Letby agrees Child M was 'not an intensive care baby' and had been doing well.
Asked if staffing levels were a contributory factor in Child M's collapse, Letby says the "unit was very stretched" during the April 9 shift. She adds she does not know what caused Child M's collapse.
Asked to clarify by Mr Johnson, she says it "was a potential" factor.
Letby tells the court Child M had been in a corner unit in a full nursery, and "as nursing and medical staff we were very stretched that day".
Staffing "was not at a great level".
Letby says she "does not know" what caused Child M's collapse, so rules out a mistake by staff. She says it is "hard to say" if staff competencies were a factor in the collapse.
Mr Johnson says Dr Ravi Jayaram observed skin colour changes in Child M at the time of the collapse. Sky News:
He says "because [Child M] was darker skinned, it was more obvious."
He said Child M was pale with pink 'blotches' on the torso that would 'appear and disappear'. He said he noted the most 'obvious' patches on the abdomen.
"I noted them when I got there at the start of the resuscitation".
He added he had only seen that once before, in the case of Child A.
Letby says "I did not see anything like that, no".
Lucy Letby is being asked about Child M, whom she is accused of leaving brain-damaged after injecting with air. Chester Standard:
"Did the lighting in the nursery make it difficult to see?" Nick Johnson KC, the prosecution barrister, asks her.
"No," says Letby.
Letby previously told the police the lighting was "poor" in the space where Child M was.
Letby is asked if the lighting was an issue in nursery room 1. Sky News:
Letby had told police in interview the lighting was "poor" in room 1, and she tells the court she has an independent memory of that event. Child M was "in a darker corner of the nursery", Letby tells the court.
She added to police: "I do remember his [Child M] colour being harder to assess as he was an Asian baby."
Letby tells the court the colour change, if any, was more difficult for her to see.
The prosecution points out that Letby has previously said she was able to see Child I had become "very pale" when in a darkened room at night, so questions why she could not see Child M in a well-lit room in the middle of the day. Chester Standard:
Mr Johnson asks why was it necessary for Child M to be in a corner of room 1 if there were four babies in there for a capacity of four.
Letby says there always needs to be an incubator free for emergency admissions in room 1.
There were four babies in nursery room 2, three in nursery 3 and four in nursery 4.
The court hears the neonatal unit was "at effective capacity".
The court is shown a clinical note by Dr Anthony Ukoh, made at 10.25am on April 9.
Letby says she does not remember if she had involvement with Child M at this time. Child M was not Letby's designated baby on this day.
A neonatal schedule for Letby on April 9 shows a number of duties Letby had for her designated babies in room 1 between 9am-9.11am.
Letby says one of the designated babies was "not a low-maintenance baby", with complex cannulation issues, and was on the ward for a long time. Mr Johnson says Letby has an "extraordinary memory" for this baby, seven years on, but not for Child D, who had died.
The court is shown a 1.5ml bile-stained aspirate is recorded for Child M, following which Child M was nil by mouth, and the naso-gastric tube was put on free drainage. Sky News:
Mr Johnson says at 3.30pm, a 10% dextrose fluid bag is started for Child M.
Letby agrees with Mr Johnson there is nothing to suggest insulin was put in this bag.
At 3.30pm on 9 April 2015, half an hour before Child M collapsed, he was given an antibiotic infusion, either by Lucy Letby or a colleague. Chester Standard (same exchange):
Letby is asked what her colleague was doing at the time.
"I can't say without looking."
Letby's colleague previously said she was dealing with a blood sample for Child L and was interrupted by Child M's emergency call.
"It was while [the colleague] was getting sterile that you sabotaged Child M," Nick Johnson KC, the prosecution barrister, says.
"No."
An extract from the witness statement of Child M's mother is then read to the court.
She said: "About ten minutes after we left the boys, a nurse came running up and said we had to go back and took me down in a wheelchair."
"Whatever happened, happened after his mum and family had left him," Mr Johnson says.
Letby says she does not recall "exact timings".
It is "another case where the parents are there and they leave and the baby collapses", Mr Johnson says.
Letby agrees this appears to be the case, but reiterates that she was with a colleague at the time.
Letby says she cannot recall what Mary Griffith was doing at this time. Mr Johnson suggests this was when Ms Griffith was collecting a blood sample for Child L to be 'podded' and sent to a laboratory for analysis.
Letby says she "couldn't say" how long it would take to draw up a 12.5% dextrose solution, which in this case was for Child L, the twin of Child M.
Letby agrees it would have been after 3.45pm that that process would have started.
Letby denies that it was around 3.45pm that she "sabotaged" Child M.
Mr Johnson says the twins' mother said in an agreed evidence statement, she had to be taken back to the unit in a wheelchair, having been alerted by nurse Yvonne Griffiths, and she observed "one of the doctors was pressing [Child M's] chest." Mr Johnson says this is another case where a baby collapsed when the parents were away.
Letby says she was with Mary Griffith at the time of Child M's collapse.
Letby agrees Child M recovered quickly following the collapse.
Letby says she did not see skin discolouration, and it was not discussed at the time.
A colleague had previously told the court Child M's blood gas record sheet was disposed of in a confidential waste bin.
Asked how it had ended under Letby's bed at home, Letby says she has never taken anything out of the confidential waste bin.
Letby says she does not know how many blood gas records she has taken home. She says it has been put in her pocket and taken home with a handover sheet.
She says she "probably" put it in her pocket, and put it under her bed.
Asked why, Letby replies: "Because I collect paper".
Letby says household bills and bank statements would be shredded as they were 'there and then'. Other sheets such as handover sheets were not thought about.
Dr Ukoh's records on the resuscitation for Child M are shown to the court. Mr Johnson says the record is "meticulous", including six adrenaline doses. Sky News:
Mr Johnson says the data for the resuscitation efforts is on the paper towel [that Letby took home], which Mr Johnson says he must have had in his hand at some point. Letby agrees.
Mr Johnson says that was in his hand at 8.25pm when he wrote up his notes.
Letby said she had to stay late that shift for the handover and writing up medical notes for Child M. She denies "waiting an hour and a quarter" to write up those nursing notes or "hanging around" to get the note Dr Ukoh had when writing up the note.
Letby denies "rooting around in the bin" for the blood gas record for Child M to take home. She also denies sabotaging Child M.
Letby says she stayed late that night to finish "all the work that needed doing". Medical records show she was still on the unit an hour and 15 minutes after her shift ended.
The prosecution claims she "hung around" on the unit to collect the paper towel, and removed confidential paperwork from the bin.
"No, I have never rooted in the bin," Letby says.
The prosecution claims she wanted the notes because she "sabotaged" the infant. Letby denies this.
Mr Johnson is now turning to the case of Child N, born on June 2, 2016.
Letby, in her defence statement, says she had never encountered a baby with haemophilia before, and no-one on the unit seemed specifically to know how to care for such a baby.
She says she does not believe Child N 'collapsed', and it was not accurate to say he had screamed for 30 minutes. She denied causing any harm to him.
Letby tells the court she does not believe this event, for Child N, was a collapse which required resuscitation.
The court is shown the nursing rota for the night shift of June 2-3. Letby was designated nurse for two babies in room 4. Child N was in room 1 with one other baby - the designated nurse for both babies was Christopher Booth.
Letby rules out staffing levels or incompetence as factors in Child N's collapse.
Letby agrees Child N collapsed just after Christopher Booth went on his break.
Letby denies she was 'bored' or had 'time on her hands' working in nursery 4 that shift.
She agrees Child N 'was in good shape' at the start of the shift.
The neonatal schedule for June 2-3 is shown, with Letby's duties for her two designated babies from 8.30pm-8.38pm.
One of the designated babies received a 50ml NGT feed at 8.30pm as they were asleep. Letby says that feed can take '10-15 minutes or so'. She says she can't put a 'definitive number' on it.
Mr Johnson says other estimates for this kinds of feed have been 20 minutes.
Letby: "I really can't say."
Mr Johnson says Letby was texting her friends 'right through this shift'.
A sequence of messages is shown to the court. The first sent by Letby is at 7.33pm, followed by 7.35pm, 7.58pm, 7.59pm, 8pm ['We have got a baby with haemophilia'], 8pm, 8.01pm, 8.02pm, 8.03pm, 8.04pm [Ah ok I'll have to Google it later lol don't know much about it [haemophilia]], 8.06pm, 8.11pm [Complex condition, yeah 50;50 chance antenatally].
NJ: "That is where you got the answer from, Dr Google?"
LL: "No, '50:50' is something staff would know"
Messages are sent by Letby at 8.26pm [Ffs Mel asing me how to make up 12.5%],
Letby said she was "shocked" that a band 6 colleague was asking her how to make up such a solution, when she could have looked for herself.
8.29pm: 'No I've passed her folder but now asking if can run via cannula- she needs to look herself!'
Letby says she was "not happy" with Mel.
Another message is sent from Letby at 8.29pm, and at 8.31pm, and 8.31pm, at 8.32pm, 8.34pm.
Letby is asked how she can feed a baby at 8.30pm when she was also texting.
LL: "You can't."
Letby denies feeding the baby "very quickly" by putting the plunger on the end.
Another message is sent from Letby at 8.38pm [Had strange message from [doctor colleague] earlier...'] Sky News:
Mr Johnson asks if Letby's nursing colleague was implying Letby and the doctor were in a relationship. Letby says she does not know.
Letby's colleague sent two messages: "Did u? Saying what?
"Go commando? 😂"
Letby is asked by Mr Johnson if she knows what the implication of 'go commando' means.
LL: "I don't know what was meant, I can't say right now."
NJ: "Do you think this was an army reference, being from Hereford?"
LL: "I don't know."
In one message, Letby's colleague encouraged her to "go commando". Chester Standard
Letby denies knowing what this means.
"What does that mean, is it a reference to the royal marines?" Nick Johnson KC, for the prosecution, asks.
"I don't know," Letby says.
"Go commando, you don't know what that means?" Mr Johnson says.
The court is shown that Letby replied with a series of laughing emojis.
"Did you think this was an army reference, you being from Hereford?"
"I don't know," Letby says.
Further text messages are shown to the court, in which Letby denies to her colleague that she was being flirty with the other colleague.
The messages are sent by Letby at 8.39pm, 8.40pm, 8.41pm, 8.43pm [Do you think he's being odd?], 8.44pm [Shut up!], 8.44pm [I don't flirt with him!].
The text message conversation was:
Letby: 'Had strange message from [colleague] earlier....'
Reply: 'Did u? Saying what?'
Letby had replied at 8.39pm: '😂😂😂😂'
LL: 'Asking when I was working next week as wants to talk to me about something, has a favour to ask..?'
Reply: 'Think he likes u too'
Reply: 'Hmm did u not ask what it was?'
LL: 'No just said when I was working and he said wants my opinion on something'
LL: 'Hmm...🤔'
Reply: 'Hmm'
LL: 'Do you think he's being odd?'
Reply: 'Thought as flirty as u'
LL: 'Shut up!'
Reply: 'What?!'
LL: 'I don't flirt with him!'
Reply: 'Ok'
LL: 'Certainly don't fancy him haha just nice guy'
Reply: 'Ok'
Mr Johnson says Letby was 'texting non-stop' on the nursery room. Sky News:
Letby says the feed "must have happened at a different time". She says she cannot answer when. She denies 'pushing it through' the feed.
Questioning continues about how Lucy Letby could have been texting her colleague "non-stop" while she was allegedly feeding a baby. Chester Standard:
"I couldn't feed a baby while texting so it must have happened at a different time," Letby says.
"What must have happened?" Mr Johnson asks.
"The feed."
Mr Johnson then says: "Or the alternative is, to use your phrase, you pushed it through."
"No," says Letby.
Child N collapsed at 1am on 3 June 2016. Notes written hours later said his oxygen levels dipped down to 40%. He is also recorded as "screaming".
"Screaming is very unusual of a child of this age," Mr Johnson says.
"Yes," says Letby.
Mr Johnson then says: "This was your doing."
"No, it was not," says Letby.
Mr Johnson says Child N collapsed at 1am. Christpher Booth 'one episode whilst I was on my break, whereby infant was crying++ and not settling. He became dusky in colour, desaturating to 40s. Responded to facial oxygen within 1-2 minutes. Crying subsided within approximately 30 minutes and colour returned to normal...'
Letby tells the court this was not a 'collapse' as facial oxygen was all that was required, not resuscitation.
Mr Johnson says Dr Jennifer Loughnane had a 'look of surprise' in court when she had read her note she had written Child N was 'screaming', as that was unusual. Letby says she does recall that.
She denies sabotaging Child N.
Mr Johnson turns to the second set of events for Child N on June 15, when the plan was for Child N to go home that week. Letby agrees he only needed phototherapy at this stage. Sky News:
A feeding chart is shown for Child N, who was being fed mostly expressed breast milk.
Child N's mother had visited on the morning of June 14, and in the evening, at 5.15pm. Child N had taken a 60ml bottle feed. Letby agrees with mr Johnson this was "a very good sign".
Mr Johnson suggests Letby did something to destabilise Child N before the end of her day shift.
LL: "No I did not."
Letby says it was a "coincidence" Child N was, according to nursing notes that night "very unsettled early part of night", with observations of mottling.
Medical notes show the infant was "unsettled" for the first half of the night shift - when Letby was not working. Chester Standard:
In a Facebook message sent to Letby, a doctor on the unit later told her: "Unsure why became unwell... They're optimistic he'll be okay."
Letby is asked about a message sent by a nursing colleague at 5.26am which said 'Baby [N] screened, looks like [s]'*
Letby responded: 'Oh no'
Letby denies she saw this as an opportunity to sabotage Child N during the day shift.
LL: "No, that's not what happened."
Letby messaged a doctor colleague at 6.04am on June 15: 'Wonder if I'll find my way back into 1 today then....',
This is in response to his message at 5.53am, which begins: 'What a chaotic 7 hours!
'Sorry - I may have filled NICU [...]
'Have a good breakfast 😉 I think your day may be busy.'
Swipe data shows that Letby is on the neonatal unit at 7.12am. Child N desaturated three minutes later and was 'crying'. Sky News
Letby says she does not recall Child N crying. She says, at the time, she was in the doorway, talking to Jennifer Jones-Key - her friend, when the alarm for Child N went off.
Letby says it "was very busy" and "a lot of intervention was needed" for Child N after he collapsed. She does not cite staffing levels as a contributing factor for the collapse, or a mistake by medical staff.
Letby says she "does not know" if issues with intubating Child N were a factor, and does not know what caused Child N to collapse.
She denies "setting up" Child N to collapse overnight.
Lucy Letby is questioned about why she arrived early to her day shift on 15 June 2016, swiping in just under 20 minutes before the handover began. Chester Standard (same evidence):
She is accused of attempting to murder Child N twice that day.
"You sabotaged him on the night shift, in effect by going in early," Nick Johnson KC, the prosecution barrister, says.
"No," says Letby.
The prosecution claims Letby set Child N "up to fail at the end of the previous day shift" and then came in early "to make it look like he came from the night shift with a problem".
Mr Johnson accuses her of "making a beeline" for Child N, in nursery three.
Letby tells the court she went into the room to speak to her friend, and at this point "handover hadn't been allocated".
But a Facebook message to a colleague timestamped at 7.12am (when she arrived on the unit) disputes this.
It says: "I've escaped being back in 1, back in 3."
At 7.15am, the child was "blue" and "wasn't breathing", according to medical notes.
Mr Johnson says this happened "within a minute or two of you arriving in that room".
"Yes," says Letby.
"Just bad luck, is it?" says Mr Johnson.
"Yes," says Letby.
Letby, in her defence statement, said she had gone to nursery room 3 not to see Child N specifically, but to speak to Jennifer Jones-Key, her friend.
She said Child N was 'blue' and 'not breathing'. She shouted for a doctor colleague to assist and Neopuff breathing assistance was applied.
Letby is asked about the 'Jennifer and I were talking at the doorway'. Letby says she meant only she was at the doorway, and Jennifer Jones-Key was in the nursery room.
Letby, in a Facebook message to a colleague: 'No repeat today. I've escaped being in 1, back in 3' at 7.12pm.
Mr Johnson says Letby had gone in to room 3 as she knew by that point she was designated babies for that room. Letby says she had gone to see her friend.
Letby denies sabotaging Child N.
Letby agrees it was a "serious event" which happened "within a minute or two" of her entering the room. Mr Johnson says it was "bad luck?" Letby replies: "Yes."
Mr Johnson asks Letby when blood was seen orally on Child N. Sky News:
Letby replies "the only time definitively" she recalled that was at 3pm. she says that is on her memory "sitting here now".
Mr Johnson says if she had recorded blood observations at the time, would she accept that now? Letby says she would, although it may have been based on what people had informed her at the time.
Mr Johnson says the one who would have informed her would have been the doctor colleague she "loved as a friend".
The doctor who responded to this initial incident is someone Letby says she "loved as a friend" - she admits this colleague would not have had it in for her. (Letby has previously accused a "band of four" colleagues of conspiring against her.)Chester Standard:
"Do you accept what [the doctor] says about this initial desaturation... about it being concerning?" Nick Johnson KC, for the prosecution, asks.
"Yes," says Letby.
Letby did not write up the nursing notes on the collapse at 7.15am of Child N - claiming she took over his care from 7.30am.
"Who discovered him [at 7.15am]?," Mr Johnson asks.
"We were both there," Letby says.
"Who discovered him?" Mr Johnson presses.
"We both heard his monitor, I went over to him," Letby says.
Mr Johnson says Letby was "hoping to create the impression on the paperwork that these were all events that happened before you arrived".
"No, I disagree."
Letby's nursing note: '...infant transferred to nursery 1 on handover. Mottled, desaturating requiring Neopuff and oxygen.'
Letby says "both" she and Jennifer Jones-Key had gone over to Child N at the time of desaturation.
Mr Johnson says Letby was "hoping to create the impression" on the nursing notes that the problems for Child N happened before the handover.
LL: "No, I disagree."
Letby tells the court she had taken over Child N's care from 7.30am.
Letby's note, written at 1.53pm-2.10pm adds: 'unable to intubate - fresh blood noted in mouth and yielded via suction ++'.Additional details from Sky News have been inserted into the above Chester Standard reporting
Letby says the 3pm blood observation was the first one she could "definitively remember".
Mr Johnson says this note is a 'good hour' before that observation.
Letby denies Child N was bleeding from when she first got involved that day.