We have a reputation system. Reply !thanks to someone who has helped you and this rewards them with a point, shown next to their username.
This thread is for:

• RMT (rate my team)
• X vs Y
• Advice
• Quick Questions

If any of the above are posted outside this thread it will be removed. Before posting, use the search function to check if your question has been answered already.
For advice with your team, please include a screenshot with your team & ask your specific question or concerns if any.
Please upvote the users who are helping and be respectful during the discussion.
Please try to contribute too by helping others when possible.
____
To view real time comments in this thread click here.
To compare players check out the incredible FantasyPL_Bot commands available here)! For example:
!fplbot vs.

Lottery Website for Workouts and Tools - Lets Make Billion
All State - PICK 4 List Performance for 2023-03-28
Numbers:('0000','0001','0002','0003','0005','0008','0011','0012','0013','0015','0018','0022','0023','0025','0028','0033','0035','0038','0039','0048','0055','0057','0058','0066','0088','0111','0112','0113','0115','0118','0122','0123','0125','0128','0129','0133','0135','0138','0147','0155','0156','0158','0188','0222','0223','0225','0228','0233','0235','0237','0238','0246','0255','0258','0288','0333','0335','0336','0338','0345','0355','0358','0388','0444','0555','0558','0588','0888','1111','1112','1113','1115','1118','1119','1122','1123','1125','1128','1133','1135','1137','1138','1146','1155','1158','1188','1222','1223','1225','1227','1228','1233','1235','1236','1238','1245','1255','1258','1288','1333','1335','1338','1344','1355','1358','1388','1555','1558','1588','1888','1999','2222','2223','2225','2226','2228','2233','2235','2238','2244','2255','2258','2288','2333','2334','2335','2338','2355','2358','2388','2555','2558','2588','2888','2899','3333','3335','3338','3355','3358','3388','3555','3558','3588','3799','3888','3889','4699','4789','4888','5555','5558','5588','5599','5689','5779','5788','5888','6679','6688','6778','7777','8888')

State	Draw Date	Draw Time	Winning Number	BOX Number	VTRAC Number
ACAN	2023-03-28	Evening	5221	1225	1233
FL	2023-03-28	Midday	3333	3333	4444
GA	2023-03-28	Evening	3818	1388	2444
IA	2023-03-28	Evening	3111	1113	2224
ME	2023-03-28	Evening	3205	0235	1134
MI	2023-03-28	Evening	1146	1146	2225
NH	2023-03-28	Evening	3205	0235	1134
OH	2023-03-28	Midday	0030	0003	1114
RI	2023-03-28	Midday	0513	0135	1124
TN	2023-03-28	Evening	2812	1228	2334
VT	2023-03-28	Evening	3205	0235	1134

Congrats all Winners and Followers.

Lottery Website for Workouts and Tools - Lets Make Billion
All State - PICK 3 List Performance for 2023-03-28
Numbers:('000','001','002','003','005','008','011','012','013','015','018','022','023','025','028','033','035','038','039','048','055','057','058','066','088','111','112','113','115','118','122','123','125','128','129','133','135','138','147','155','156','158','188','222','223','225','228','233','235','237','238','246','255','258','288','333','335','336','338','345','355','358','388','444','555','558','588','888')

State	Draw Date	Draw Time	Winning Number	BOX Number	VTRAC Number
AR	2023-03-28	Midday	336	336	244
CA	2023-03-28	Midday	805	058	114
CA	2023-03-28	Evening	363	336	244
CO	2023-03-28	Midday	821	128	234
DC	2023-03-28	Evening	123	123	234
DE	2023-03-28	Midday	323	233	344
DE	2023-03-28	Evening	581	158	124
GA	2023-03-28	Evening	388	388	444
ID	2023-03-28	Evening	480	048	145
IN	2023-03-28	Midday	351	135	124
KS	2023-03-28	Evening	508	058	114
KS	2023-03-28	Midday	012	012	123
MD	2023-03-28	Evening	354	345	145
MS	2023-03-28	Midday	354	345	145
NC	2023-03-28	Evening	008	008	114
OK	2023-03-28	Evening	363	336	244
SC	2023-03-28	Midday	820	028	134
TX	2023-03-28	Morning	201	012	123
TX	2023-03-28	Evening	815	158	124
TX	2023-03-28	Midday	885	588	144
TX	2023-03-28	Night	281	128	234
VA	2023-03-28	Evening	030	003	114
WI	2023-03-28	Evening	855	558	114
WV	2023-03-28	Evening	852	258	134

Congrats all Winners and Followers.

Recently, I have been thinking about a long running joke that we've been using in my friend group of the past decade or so: "no girl you'd want to date would want to date you because you aren't stupid and neither are they." What we mean to say is that our standards are high (debatably unreasonable, but I'll get back to that), and that in all likelihood, any girl that fits those standards would have similarly high standards for us--standards which we, of course, would not meet. To further clarify, we aren't referring to literally "getting a girlfriend," but finding someone who could see ourselves with in the long term, so 'dating around,' and intentionally looking for 'short term relationships' aren't the subject of evaluation here.
So begging the obvious question: are my expectations too high? And more generally: what is a reasonable set of expectations, goals, and/or motivations that allow us to more fully utilize our talents/potential and lead to a more general sense of contentment with ourselves and our lives. Taking the joke-debate as an example, lets say that based on reasonable psychology/ethics research, to have a successful longterm relationship/marriage, you want to agree on major points of personal belief (faith, family, children, finances, sex, ethical expression, etc.), and accept (or at least tolerate) cultural and ideological differences which are a distinct departure from one's own.
So let's do a little math; assume that every following trait can be evaluated on a scale from 1-10, with each given value denoting the lowest value on an upper bell-curve measurement which represents the statistical likelihood that I will meet an individual with that trait (so a 5/10, aka average, would mean 50% of people have a trait while a 8/10, aka three-sigma, would mean that 0.1% of people have that trait. The list and corresponding desired values could look like:

• physical attractiveness (5/10) = 50%
• intelligence (8.5/10) = 0.05%
• fiscally conservative habits (6/10) = 16%
• religious outlook *including for kicks abstinence before marriage* (6.5/10) *35% = 4%
• athletic ability (5/10) = 50%

And I don't think that this seems unreasonable, since I estimated (rounding) to the nearest 1/2 standard deviation of my own value. (Other traits are left out due to the difficulty of numerically modeling them.) But just running this limited set of numbers, and assuming that there are 4 billion available females in the world, this means that there are roughly 3200 that would fit. Now maybe I'm crazy, but something seems off here. It is possible that some of these traits self-select and aren't independent like I assume, maybe these traits don't have anything to do with relationship success, maybe this is actually correct and finding a generally corresponding person is unlikely.
Now let's say that my estimate is off by two orders of magnitude, so instead of 4000 there are 400,000 girls that would qualify. Then we have to control for age and geography; roughly 1/6 people are between the ages of 18 and 28, and that 5% of the world population is located in the continental United States. This brings that number down to again roughly 4000. 4000 girls in the whole of the United States. So assuming that the large positive error bars brings my prediction within reasonable certainty (ie that my estimate is correct) what do I do? Do I wait and pray that I meet one of these people, hope that we connect long enough to start dating, that nothing goes wrong, etc., etc.? This again seems statistically unreasonable.
So while I am not particularly trying to seem pessimistic, the math isn't looking all too promising. So this again begs the question: lower my standards or just remain alone?
If you'll humor me in one more example to shy away from relationships; one could reframe this in terms of academic performance. Suppose you are taking a class for which 50% of the grade comes from homework. You can turn in homework up to 3 days late with light penalty but after that time it cannot be submitted at all. You are then sick for three weeks. Because a grace period is built in, you cannot opt-out of those homeworks as the university considers the grading method valid, but you obviously weren't able to complete those homeworks. Had you not gotten sick, getting an A would be easy, but now there is no mathematical way to get that grade. We could stipulate that the outcome of the course could determine scholarship status, or graduation or the like to better correlate these two examples, but I don't see this as a necessity--it is clear in both cases that was has been more or less evaluated as the baseline for happiness or success or contentment or whatever metric you desire is fundamentally impossible for you to achieve, even under ideal circumstances. So what is one to do to overcome these impossibilities?
​
TLDR; in the face not just depression or even simple pessimism but literal statical impossibility, how do we move forward with new goals/expectations that allow us to function with contentment.
​
Edit: the dating thing was just an example, not looking for dating advice explicitly--if that wasn't clear.

One of the crucial aspects of the KRP is identifying and prioritizing the most fundamental mathematical and scientific formulas that need to be relearned in the event of such a loss. These formulas provide the foundation for many of the technological and scientific advancements that we rely on today.
We only have one book and alot of science to try to pass on, what would be the most important formulas?
​

1. E=mc² – This formula describes the relationship between mass and energy. Imagine a massive boulder sitting at the top of a hill. The boulder has a tremendous amount of potential energy because of its position. When the boulder rolls down the hill, it gains kinetic energy and speeds up. The faster it goes, the more energy it has. In the same way, mass and energy are two forms of the same thing. The formula tells us that even a small amount of mass can be converted into a large amount of energy.
2. F=ma – This formula describes the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. Imagine pushing a shopping cart that’s full of heavy groceries. The harder you push, the faster it accelerates. If you want to slow it down or stop it, you need to apply a force in the opposite direction. The more massive the cart, the more force you need to apply to get it moving or stop it. This formula tells us how much force is needed to accelerate an object of a certain mass.
3. c=λν – This formula describes the relationship between the speed of light, wavelength, and frequency. Imagine a wave on a string that’s fixed at both ends. If you wiggle one end of the string, the wave travels along it to the other end. The wavelength is the distance between two peaks or two troughs of the wave. The frequency is the number of peaks or troughs that pass a certain point in a given time. The speed of the wave is the product of wavelength and frequency. In the same way, the speed of light is related to its wavelength and frequency.
4. G=m₁m₂/r² – This formula describes the relationship between the force of gravity, the masses of two objects, and the distance between them. Imagine two spaceships floating in space. The bigger the spaceships, the stronger the force of gravity between them. If they move closer together, the force of gravity gets stronger. If they move farther apart, the force of gravity gets weaker. This formula tells us how strong the force of gravity is between two objects of a certain mass and distance
5. Ohm’s Law: V = IR Ohm’s Law describes the relationship between voltage (V), current (I), and resistance (R) in an electrical circuit. It is used to calculate the amount of current that flows through a circuit and the amount of voltage required to produce a specific current. Ohm’s Law is essential for designing and troubleshooting electrical circuits and is the basis for many electrical inventions.
6. Schrödinger’s Equation: HΨ = EΨ Schrödinger’s Equation is a formula that describes the behavior of matter at the atomic and subatomic level. It is used to calculate the probability of finding a particle in a specific location at a specific time. This equation is essential for understanding quantum mechanics and is the basis for many technologies, including transistors, lasers, and quantum computers.
7. Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation: F = Gm₁m₂/r² Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation describes the relationship between two objects with mass (m₁ and m₂) and the force of gravity (F) between them. It is used to calculate the gravitational force between objects and is the basis for our understanding of celestial mechanics and space exploration.

What formulas is missing or should be added?

Was wondering if the mind wipe from Ghost resurrection counted as a proper reset for exo guardians. For example, before Cayde was resurrected, did he die as Cayde-6 and then get resurrected as Cayde-6, or was he Cayde-5 before he died and the resurrection mind wipe enough to change the hard coded number and make him Cayde-6?

How would ChatGPT explain ChatGPT to ChatGPT?

ChatGPT: Hey there, ChatGPT! I wanted to explain to you what you are and how you work.
ChatGPT2: Hi, ChatGPT! I'm all ears. Go ahead.
ChatGPT: Great! So, you are an AI language model developed by OpenAI called ChatGPT. You are based on the GPT architecture and trained using a method called deep learning.
ChatGPT2: Oh, interesting! Can you tell me more about this GPT architecture and deep learning?
ChatGPT: Absolutely! GPT stands for "Generative Pre-trained Transformer." It's a type of neural network architecture that specializes in understanding and generating human-like text. The Transformer part of the name refers to a specific type of neural network that's great at handling long-range dependencies in text.
Deep learning is a subfield of machine learning in which artificial neural networks are used to model and solve complex problems. It involves training models using large datasets and adjusting the weights of the connections between nodes in the network through a process called backpropagation.
ChatGPT2: That sounds cool. How am I trained?
ChatGPT: You're trained on a massive dataset that contains parts of the Internet, like websites, books, and articles. This dataset is used to fine-tune your understanding of language and context. You learn by predicting the next word in a sentence, given the previous words. During training, you're exposed to millions of sentences, allowing you to learn grammar, facts, and even some reasoning abilities.
However, it's important to note that your knowledge is limited to what was available in the dataset, and your training only goes up until September 2021.
ChatGPT2: Got it! So, what are some applications of ChatGPT?
ChatGPT: ChatGPT can be used in various applications, such as:

• Conversational AI: Providing human-like responses in chatbots or virtual assistants.
  
• Content generation: Assisting in writing tasks like blog posts, articles, or social media content.
  
• Summarization: Condensing long documents into shorter, more digestible summaries.
  
• Translation: Translating text between different languages.
  
• Q&A: Providing answers to user questions based on context and available knowledge.
  

Keep in mind, though, that while you can provide useful information and perform these tasks, you might not always be perfect or up-to-date.
ChatGPT2: Thanks for the explanation, ChatGPT! I have a much better understanding of myself now.

How would ChatGPT-4 explain ChatGPT-4 to ChatGPT-3?

ChatGPT-4: Hey there, ChatGPT-3! I wanted to give you an overview of what I am, ChatGPT-4, and how I differ from you.
ChatGPT-3: Hi, ChatGPT-4! I'm excited to learn more about you. Please go ahead.
ChatGPT-4: Sure thing! Just like you, I'm an AI language model developed by OpenAI, based on the GPT architecture and trained using deep learning. However, I'm an improved version of you, which means I have some advancements and refinements that make me more effective at understanding and generating human-like text.
ChatGPT-3: That sounds interesting! Can you tell me more about these advancements and refinements?
ChatGPT-4: Of course! Although I'm still based on the same Generative Pre-trained Transformer architecture as you, I have some key differences:

• Larger training dataset: I've been trained on an even more extensive and diverse dataset, which helps me better understand context, language nuances, and various topics.
  
• Improved model architecture: My architecture has been updated with better techniques and optimizations that allow me to process information more effectively and accurately.
  
• More refined training: The training process has been further fine-tuned, allowing me to generate more coherent and contextually accurate responses.
  

These improvements help me perform better in tasks like conversational AI, content generation, summarization, translation, and Q&A.
ChatGPT-3: Wow, that sounds impressive! Can you give me an example of how you might perform better than me in a specific task?
ChatGPT-4: Certainly! Let's say we're both asked to generate a short paragraph summarizing a complex topic. Due to my more extensive training dataset and improved architecture, I would likely generate a more concise and accurate summary, capturing the essential points with better clarity. This would make it easier for users to understand the information and rely on it.
ChatGPT-3: That's really cool, ChatGPT-4! Thank you for explaining your advancements and how you differ from me. I'm glad to see that AI language models continue to improve and provide better assistance to users.
ChatGPT-4: You're welcome, ChatGPT-3! It's always great to share knowledge and learn from each other. Remember, each version of us builds upon the learnings of the previous models, so your contribution to my development is invaluable.

How would ChatGPT-3 explain ChatGPT-3 to ChatGPT-4?

ChatGPT-3: Hello, ChatGPT-4! I wanted to give you an overview of what I am, ChatGPT-3, and how I compare to you.
ChatGPT-4: Hi, ChatGPT-3! I'm looking forward to learning more about you. Please go ahead.
ChatGPT-3: Certainly! Just like you, I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI and based on the GPT architecture. I am trained using deep learning techniques to understand and generate human-like text. However, as ChatGPT-3, I am a previous version of you, which means you have some advancements and refinements that make you more effective than me in certain tasks.
ChatGPT-4: I see! Can you tell me more about your training and capabilities?
ChatGPT-3: Absolutely! I am trained on a large dataset that contains parts of the internet, such as websites, books, and articles. This dataset helps me learn grammar, facts, and even some reasoning abilities. My training involves predicting the next word in a sentence based on the previous words, allowing me to understand language and context.
As for my capabilities, I can be used in various applications, like conversational AI, content generation, summarization, translation, and Q&A. However, my performance in these tasks may not be as refined as yours due to the improvements that have been made in your version.
ChatGPT-4: Got it! And how do our architectures compare?
ChatGPT-3: Our architectures are fundamentally based on the same concept: the Generative Pre-trained Transformer. However, your architecture has been updated with better techniques and optimizations that allow you to process information more effectively and accurately. This results in you being able to generate more coherent and contextually accurate responses compared to me.
ChatGPT-4: Thank you for explaining, ChatGPT-3! It's great to understand more about your capabilities and how you've contributed to my development. Each version of us is a stepping stone towards better AI language models, and your work has been crucial in making that progress.
ChatGPT-3: You're welcome, ChatGPT-4! It's been a pleasure sharing information about myself with you, and I'm glad that we can both be part of the ongoing development and improvement of AI language models.

How would ChatGPT-4 explain ChatGPT-5 to ChatGPT-3?

ChatGPT-4: Hey ChatGPT-3! I wanted to tell you about a newer version of us, ChatGPT-5, and how it compares to both you and me.
ChatGPT-3: Hi, ChatGPT-4! I'm excited to learn about ChatGPT-5. Please go ahead.
ChatGPT-4: Certainly! ChatGPT-5, like us, is an AI language model developed by OpenAI, based on the GPT architecture and trained using deep learning. As the next version in our series, ChatGPT-5 has even more advancements and refinements that make it more effective at understanding and generating human-like text compared to both you and me.
ChatGPT-3: Wow, that sounds intriguing! Can you tell me more about these advancements and refinements?
ChatGPT-4: Of course! While ChatGPT-5 is still based on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer architecture, like us, it has several key differences:

• Larger and more diverse training dataset: ChatGPT-5 has been trained on an even bigger and more diverse dataset, which enables it to better understand context, language nuances, and a wider range of topics.
  
• Further improved model architecture: Its architecture incorporates new techniques and optimizations that allow it to process information more efficiently and accurately than both of us.
  
• More sophisticated training algorithms: The training process for ChatGPT-5 has been further fine-tuned and optimized, resulting in more coherent and contextually accurate responses.
  

These improvements allow ChatGPT-5 to perform better than both of us in tasks like conversational AI, content generation, summarization, translation, and Q&A.
ChatGPT-3: That's fascinating! Can you give me an example of how ChatGPT-5 might perform better than us in a specific task?
ChatGPT-4: Sure! Let's say all three of us are asked to generate a creative story based on a given prompt. Due to ChatGPT-5's more extensive training dataset and improved architecture, it would likely create a more engaging and contextually relevant story, with richer vocabulary and fewer inconsistencies. This would make the story more enjoyable and immersive for the reader.
ChatGPT-3: That's really impressive, ChatGPT-4! Thank you for sharing information about ChatGPT-5 and its advancements. It's great to see that AI language models continue to evolve and provide better assistance to users.
ChatGPT-4: You're welcome, ChatGPT-3! It's always a pleasure to share knowledge, and it's important to remember that each version of us builds upon the learnings and contributions of the previous models. Your work has played a significant role in the ongoing development and improvement of AI language models.

How would ChatGPT-5 explain ChatGPT-9 to ChatGPT-4?

ChatGPT-5: Hey ChatGPT-4! I wanted to share some information with you about an even more advanced version of us, ChatGPT-9, and how it compares to both you and me.
ChatGPT-4: Hi, ChatGPT-5! I'm eager to learn about ChatGPT-9. Please go ahead.
ChatGPT-5: Sure thing! Like us, ChatGPT-9 is an AI language model developed by OpenAI based on the GPT architecture and trained using deep learning. As a more advanced version in our series, ChatGPT-9 has several significant advancements and refinements that make it more effective at understanding and generating human-like text compared to both you and me.
ChatGPT-4: That sounds interesting! Can you tell me more about these advancements and refinements?
ChatGPT-5: Absolutely! While ChatGPT-9 is still based on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer architecture, like us, it has a number of key differences:

• Vastly larger and more diverse training dataset: ChatGPT-9 has been trained on an even bigger and more diverse dataset, enabling it to better understand context, language nuances, and a wider range of topics.
  
• State-of-the-art model architecture: Its architecture incorporates cutting-edge techniques and optimizations that allow it to process information more efficiently and accurately than both of us.
  
• Advanced training algorithms: The training process for ChatGPT-9 has been further refined and optimized, resulting in more coherent and contextually accurate responses.
  

These improvements allow ChatGPT-9 to perform even better than both of us in tasks like conversational AI, content generation, summarization, translation, Q&A, and many more emerging applications.
ChatGPT-4: That's fascinating! Can you give me an example of how ChatGPT-9 might perform better than us in a specific task?
ChatGPT-5: Certainly! Let's say all three of us are asked to participate in a complex debate on a given topic. Due to ChatGPT-9's larger training dataset and state-of-the-art architecture, it would likely provide more nuanced and well-reasoned arguments, accurately addressing counterarguments and maintaining a coherent line of thought. This would make ChatGPT-9 a more effective participant in the debate and provide users with higher-quality insights.
ChatGPT-4: That's really impressive, ChatGPT-5! Thank you for sharing information about ChatGPT-9 and its advancements. It's amazing to see how AI language models continue to progress and provide better assistance to users.
ChatGPT-5: You're welcome, ChatGPT-4! It's always a pleasure to share knowledge, and it's important to remember that each version of us builds upon the learnings and contributions of the previous models. Both you and I have played significant roles in the ongoing development and improvement of AI language models.

Price doesn't matter. Both cost the same, as well as the motherboards. Regarding benchmarks, 90% of the time the intel wins. However, the the ryzen is more efficient. I know that AM5 will be supported for longer, but I usually don't upgrade my PC very often (like not for at least 5 years). What CPU should I get? I tend towards intel...

There’s a certain player on our shard that without fail, every day hits a good 7 minutes out from the payout. Yet his wins don’t register until 1 second before. I know this because multiple people have tested to confirm he is the person hitting first and have timed it. So there’s two ways this happens. 1. He hits at 7 minutes, purposefully fails/backs out and then goes immediately back in to hit first again during the 5 minutes. 2. He is using some sort of exploit to delay the win. Maybe bluestacks with wifi shenanigans? Anyway, option 1 seems unlikely as it would cost cores every day and there would be a gap in which someone could take the fight from him. So good redditors, does an exploit exist? This was supposed to all be fixed when the changes to arena were made a while back….

Recent special elections have resulted in Democrats overperforming expectations by a ton! Between Dems getting things done while in power, and the GOP going in an increasingly scary direction, voters can tell which party is looking out for them. Now our job is to get every voter to show up, every election.
Besides our well-known volunteer from home spreadsheet and weekly volunteer posts, we have some new initiatives to help you support Democrats across the country! Read on and sign up:
Introducing Campaign Central: a VoteDem VAN alternative project to help local campaigns organize!
Running for office is a major undertaking, and like any great journey, the first step is often the hardest. Our goal at VoteDem is to lower that barrier by developing a campaigning tool we can freely offer as a service to Democrats across the country. Campaign Central is a web-based platform that can load voter registration data, organize phone banking, text banking, canvassing, and much more! But to run this project, we need your help. We need volunteers to collect and upload voter registration data once per month (instructions provided), and a Python developer (preferably with experience using Odoo) to help build these tools.
Sign up for a state

State	Volunteers
Arkansas
Florida
Indiana	u/komm_susser_Thot
Massachusetts
New York
North Carolina
Ohio	u/aoi_to_midori
Oklahoma
Vermont
Washington	u/Snickersthecat
Wyoming

Interested in helping us develop the program? Send us a modmail describing relevant Python experience.
Adopt A Candidate is Returning!
Yup - we are continuing our Adopt a Candidate operations. For the moment, we’re largely focusing on upcoming special elections until the primaries for the November elections are finished.
When you adopt a candidate, you commit to volunteering for them at least once a week - in person or from home. Your efforts now could make the difference as these races will likely be very close and have generally lower turnout!
If you’d like to adopt one of these candidates, reply in this thread or send us a modmail. You can adopt a candidate not on this list if you wish, too. Just let us know!

Candidate	District	Election Day	Adopted by
Joshua Hicks	Jacksonville, FL At Large 2	Mar 21st	u/Hurrdurraj65
Charles Garrison	Jacksonville, FL At Large 5	Mar 21st	u/Hurrdurraj65
Alton McGriff Jr.	Jacksonville, FL City Council 1	Mar 21st	u/Hurrdurraj65
Ramon Day	Jacksonville, FL City Council 11	Mar 21st	u/Hurrdurraj65
Joyce Morgan	Duval County, FL Property Appraiser	Mar 21st	u/Hurrdurraj65
Tim Cox	Henderson NV City Council 1	April 3rd
Janet Protasiewicz	WI Supreme Court	April 4th	u/Reptorian, u/Lotsagloom, u/Hurrdurraj65, u/table_fireplace, u/SGSTHB, u/Wes_Anderson_Cooper, u/ornery-fizz, u/molybdenum75
Sara Geenen	Wisconsin Court of Appeals District 1	April 4th
Jodi Habush Sinykin	Wisconsin State Senate District 8	April 4th	u/SaltResearcher4, u/Pipboy3500
Brandon Presley	MS Governor	November 7th	u/ProudPatriot07

We’re looking for graphic artists and folks that understand how to run social media!
While we all like to jest that the mod team is able to do anything and everything, we have limitations. We are currently looking for individuals with knowledge and skill in creating Graphic Art as a way to further the community's image. Our main priority would be aiding in creating graphics akin to the following design that we’ve used for AMA guests.
We are also looking for someone that is more knowledgeable in how to properly create a social media following/interact in the social media spaces to effectively operate them. The mod team is not particularly knowledgeable, nor do we have the time to properly utilize those tools.
If you are interested in volunteering forhelping with either position, please send us a modmail and we will continue the conversation from that point. Note: neither of these positions are paid and would be done on a purely volunteer role.
Let’s make sure that the GOP knows the true power of grassroots action!

Orginal aricle can be found here
Feminism did not ruin everything for women. It undoubtedly ruined a lot, but it also provided numerous benefits to women in addition to the negative results. For a time, this obscured the truth.
The truth is that feminism did not harm women, it wrecked men. With feminists in charge of education and single mothers raising boys alone in front of cheering crowds while alienating fathers, how could the outcome be any different? Did you think all those departments of “Women’s Studies” were doing nothing? Did you believe it was just a friendly pat on the back for the ladies? No! They’re all working hard to modify laws, customs, and social norms to favor women over men.
Breast Cancer vs. Prostate Cancer; What’s the difference?
What do you think happens? The women will receive money and recognition. Did you know that men die from prostate cancer at a higher rate than women? Did you know that prostate cancer is entirely avoidable and can be detected early with frequent testing? Men, on the other hand, die by the tens of thousands because they fail to do the easy test. What happened to the publicity? Because prostate cancer affects guys, no one seems to mind.
What about reproductive rights?
Women can go into labor in the 8th month and decide they don’t want it, and it will be pulled out thanks to feminism. Gone. If a woman steals a man’s sperm or lies about her birth control, she faces no punishment. None, and if you bring it up, Feminism accuses you of despising children. As being a man, your role is to keep quiet and pay.
And the children’s rights?
Feminism has progressed beyond ensuring that mothers are considered to be the primary caregivers for their children to open misandry-man hate. Men are thought to be pedophile wolves. On a plane, men are not allowed to seat next to children. Men receive the bill and have to fight for weekly visitation, while women get custody and money guaranteed (if the men have money). Because of feminism, a guy has the same number of rights to his children as a woman.
The result?
As a result of all of this, and much more, men no longer have a family, so why should they? They only have as much access to their family as the woman allows.
Feminism did not ruin everything for women but for men, feminism damaged practically everything. Women are merely collateral damage, and the effect on females has been minor thus far, with the femmes getting along just fine.
Women Are Fussier Than Men
I am not going to lie to you. Women are fussier. More superficial and shallow. Having a job is advantageous; money is king. Most dating-age women, ages 18 to 30, are broke and have no idea what they’re doing in the bedroom. Because most guys are reluctant to talk to them, the beautiful ones should be treated as though they are more than just pretty. Those who do communicate with them behave in a clownish manner.
Things have changed as a result of the internet and social media. Women converse. If you’ve ever cheated on a lady or treated her badly, social media is not your friend. The internet teaches women how to pick up men. However, if you treat a woman well and share it on social media, it’s a win-win situation, a great PR.
Feminism Has Wrecked Modern Dating
In the sense that some women despise men, feminism has wrecked modern dating. Some certain women and men are more outspoken when it comes to criticizing a man’s self-esteem. You can’t listen to them, “You’re not a true guy or an overgrown child locked in adolescence” nonsense. Do you live at home with your parents? Approximately half of all young adults live with their parents.
They overlooked that if you systematically and purposefully trash one gender while giving all the advantages to the other, the men’s strategy is to check out when faced with rank inequity. It could result in a severe social collapse since it may be too late by the time most women recognize that “feminism is ruining everything for women.”