Ib standard level maths formula booklet

[For Hire] Do you need a pro tutor to help with Accounting & Finance or mathematics? I provide Top Quality assistance in Accounting & Finance. (Corporate, Management, Reporting, Analysis, etc) & Math(Calculus 1,2,3 & Statistics, R studio, SQL, Python)

2023.06.07 11:16 FestiveSon_2746 [For Hire] Do you need a pro tutor to help with Accounting & Finance or mathematics? I provide Top Quality assistance in Accounting & Finance. (Corporate, Management, Reporting, Analysis, etc) & Math(Calculus 1,2,3 & Statistics, R studio, SQL, Python)

For Hire
Hdot#6305
Whatsapp - ‪+1 (608) 686‑2825‬
^ I’m a Math expert with professional experience in Finance and Accounting (ACCA, IFRS standards). I have been a part-time private tutor for 6years now and my colleague is an expert in Chemistry & Biochem. We have successfully assisted many students with their assignments, tests, and exams in the following areas :
*Calculus 1, 2, 3, ODEs, PDEs, Complex Analysis, Vector and Tensor Analysis, Discrete Math, Algebra, Real Analysis, etc
*Intro level probability and statistics
*Accounting & Finance (All coursework, Including Case Studies)
*Chemistry & Biochem .
We treat our clients with respect and professional ethics. Don’t hesitate to send me a message if you need any help with any of the subjects listed above or simply
email: [[email protected]]
Hdot#6305
Whatsapp: +1 (608) 686‑2825‬
Cheers
submitted by FestiveSon_2746 to Accountingstudenthelp [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 11:10 Only-Chard-4561 The Rise of Test-Optional Admissions: What It Means for Students

The Rise of Test-Optional Admissions: What It Means for Students
In recent years, a significant shift has taken place in the realm of college admissions. Many universities and colleges across the globe have embraced test-optional admissions policies, where students are given the choice to submit standardized test scores, such as the SAT or ACT, as part of their application. This departure from traditional admission practices has sparked a spirited debate among educators, students, and parents. This article aims to explore the rise of test-optional admissions, examine its implications for students, and offer insights into navigating this evolving landscape.
1. Understanding the Test-Optional Movement
A. Historical context: Briefly discuss the history and evolution of standardized tests in college admissions, highlighting their original purpose and subsequent criticisms. B. Origins of test-optional admissions: Explain how the test-optional movement gained momentum, citing influential factors such as research studies, increasing recognition of inequities in testing, and the efforts of advocacy groups. C. The growth of test-optional policies: Provide statistics and examples to demonstrate the widespread adoption of test-optional policies by colleges and universities in the United States and internationally.
2. Pros and Cons of Test-Optional Admissions
A. Advantages for students:
​
  1. Equity and access: Discuss how test-optional policies can mitigate barriers for marginalized and underrepresented students, including those from low-income backgrounds and historically disadvantaged communities.
  2. Holistic evaluation: Explore how test-optional policies encourage admissions officers to consider a wider range of factors, such as academic achievements, extracurricular activities, personal essays, and recommendation letters, promoting a more comprehensive and nuanced assessment of applicants.
  3. Reducing stress and anxiety: Highlight how the removal of mandatory test submissions can alleviate the pressure on students, allowing them to focus on other aspects of their applications and pursue a more balanced high school experience.
B. Criticisms and potential challenges:
​
  1. Perceived unfairness: Discuss concerns that test-optional policies may create an uneven playing field, as students who choose to submit scores could have an advantage over those who don't.
  2. Institutional biases: Address the notion that without standardized test scores, admissions decisions may rely more heavily on subjective criteria, potentially perpetuating biases inherent in the application review process.
  3. Impact on scholarships and merit aid: Explore how test-optional policies may affect students' eligibility for scholarships and financial aid, considering the potential influence of test scores on award decisions.
Navigating the Test-Optional Landscape
A. Self-reflection and decision-making: Guide students on determining whether to submit test scores or opt for a test-optional approach, emphasizing the importance of introspection, understanding individual strengths, and researching specific college requirements. B. Strengthening other aspects of the application: Offer practical advice on leveraging non-test-related components, such as GPA, extracurricular activities, personal statements, and recommendation letters, to compensate for the absence of test scores. C. Test preparation and readiness: Discuss how students who choose to submit test scores can still benefit from test preparation strategies and resources, emphasizing the importance of targeted studying, practice tests, and understanding the specific expectations of colleges. D. Communicating with colleges: Encourage students to engage with admissions officers, attend virtual information sessions, and college fairs, and utilize the available channels to seek clarifications and gain insights into how test-optional policies are implemented at individual institutions.
​
https://preview.redd.it/y1fvvv0cbk4b1.jpg?width=3500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2cb81de69efadce7895b8f345dfe50ddc047e123
University Acceptance: Navigating the Path to Higher Education
Entering college or university is a milestone moment for many students. It signifies a new chapter in their lives, offering opportunities for personal growth, academic exploration, and career development. However, the path to university acceptance can often be daunting and competitive. This article aims to provide guidance and insights into the university acceptance process, helping students understand the key factors considered by admissions committees and offering practical tips to increase their chances of gaining admission to their desired institutions.
1. Understanding the University Acceptance Process
A. The role of admissions committees: Explain the purpose and function of admissions committees, highlighting their responsibility in reviewing applications and selecting a diverse and qualified student body. B. Application requirements: Discuss the common components of a university application, including academic transcripts, standardized test scores, essays/personal statements, recommendation letters, extracurricular activities, and any additional materials required by specific institutions. C. Admission criteria: Explore the factors that admissions committees typically consider, such as academic performance, test scores, demonstrated passion and interest in a chosen field, leadership experiences, community involvement, and personal qualities that align with the institution's values. D. The holistic approach: Emphasize the growing trend of universities adopting a holistic review process, which considers applicants as multifaceted individuals rather than just their test scores or grades. Highlight the importance of presenting a well-rounded profile.
2. Strategies to Enhance University Acceptance Chances
A. Academic preparation:
​
  1. Course selection: Discuss the significance of taking rigorous coursework, such as advanced placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) classes, and how it demonstrates academic readiness.
  2. Maintaining a strong GPA: Highlight the importance of consistent academic performance and offer tips for academic success, including effective study habits, time management, and seeking support when needed.
B. Standardized tests:
​
  1. Understanding the options: Discuss the role of standardized tests, such as the SAT or ACT, in the admissions process and provide an overview of the different test formats and scoring systems.
  2. Test preparation: Offer guidance on creating a study plan, utilizing practice resources, and considering test preparation courses or tutors if necessary.
C. Crafting a compelling application:
​
  1. Personal statement/essay: Provide tips on brainstorming, drafting, and revising a strong personal statement that showcases the applicant's unique qualities, experiences, and aspirations.
  2. Recommendation letters: Offer advice on selecting appropriate recommenders, building relationships with teachers or mentors, and providing them with relevant information to write compelling letters of recommendation.
  3. Extracurricular activities: Emphasize the importance of quality over quantity, encouraging students to pursue activities that align with their interests and passions, showcase leadership and initiative, and demonstrate a commitment to their communities.
D. Demonstrating passion and fit:
​
  1. Researching institutions: Discuss the significance of understanding an institution's values, programs, and opportunities, and how this knowledge can be integrated into application materials.
  2. Campus visits and interviews: Highlight the benefits of visiting campuses or attending virtual information sessions and how it can help students gain a deeper understanding of the institution and make a positive impression during interviews.

Conclusion

The rise of test-optional admissions has ushered in a new era in the college application process, giving students greater flexibility and autonomy in presenting their qualifications. While the debate surrounding test-optional policies continues, it is evident that this shift has opened doors for students from diverse backgrounds, leveling the playing field and promoting a more holistic approach to evaluating applicants. Students now have the opportunity to showcase their strengths and potential through other aspects of their application, such as their academic achievements, extracurricular involvements, personal essays, and recommendation letters. However, it is essential for students to carefully consider their circumstances and make informed decisions regarding test submission. Navigating the test-optional landscape requires thoughtful self-reflection, strategic preparation, and effective communication with colleges. As the landscape of college admissions continues to evolve, students should stay informed, seek guidance from trusted mentors, and focus on presenting a comprehensive and authentic portrayal of themselves to secure acceptance to their desired universities. Ultimately, test-optional admissions policies have redefined the parameters of university acceptance, emphasizing the importance of a multifaceted evaluation process that looks beyond standardized test scores and encourages a more inclusive and equitable approach to higher education.
submitted by Only-Chard-4561 to u/Only-Chard-4561 [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 09:50 ripped-stepdad Career change from nonprofit finance

Hoping for some career advice.
I’m 29. I went to undergrad at a state school, majored in Econ and Spanish, minored in Math, graduated with a 4.0 and passed the Level 1 CFA within a couple weeks of graduation.
After I fucked off to Spain for a year teaching English but mostly having fun. I stayed a 2nd year and did a masters in International Econ (specialization in development). It was a good program for Europeans, but being American, I came back to the states and it didn’t hold much weight or provide me any connections.
I worked in DC for 2 years at a nonprofit Donor Advised Fund as a finance/compliance associate. Now I’ve just completed 2 years at a large international NGO - finance manger for their impact investing team. I always wanted to make a difference with my work, but I also only make a nonprofit salary ($70k).
My current work is fun, decently fulfilling, not too demanding, and I enjoy the people I work with. Most of my team comes from consulting or IB backgrounds (very atypical for NGOs but my small team was driven to the space to make impact). They generally earn a lot more than me because of their backgrounds and have skills picked up earlier in their careers I simply never developed.
At 29, I’ve come to the realization money matters to me. I’m satisfied with how much I enjoyed the majority of my 20s but realize it’s time to get serious about a career. I don’t want to be stuck in a nonprofit finance role forever. I’d like to have a real career in FP&A or business analytics. I’d like to have trajectory to a CFO/CIO role some day.
I feel like I’m in a unique situation that’s closed a lot of entry-level consulting or financial opportunities to gain experience. I’m wonder what the best next steps would be. I have no debt, but also only about $30k of savings. I have no family commitments (not interested in kids at least until mid-30s).
• Is it worth picking up the CFA studies again and working to pass level 2?
• Would a PT MBA be of any benefit? It’d be hard for me to take on all that debt without a clear path to a much higher salary after.
• Should I look into FT MBAs or some kind of finance masters from a US institution?
• Is there any chance of pivoting to an entry-level consulting or financial analysis role from where I am now? It seems like people more than 1-2 years out of undergrad aren’t desirable for these positions.
Any advice is greatly appreciated! Thanks all
submitted by ripped-stepdad to FinancialCareers [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 09:23 bravebaby_skincare Understanding Tear-Free Baby Shampoo: A Guide for Parents

Understanding Tear-Free Baby Shampoo: A Guide for Parents
https://preview.redd.it/9uqd7284sj4b1.jpg?width=670&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0155f0dd1928d3f5f3c824ea8564e05428f7b8d9
Understanding Tear-Free Baby Shampoo: A Guide for Parents" is an informative guide that provides parents with a comprehensive understanding of tear-free baby shampoos. This concise resource offers essential information about tear-free formulations, their benefits, and how they effectively care for a baby's delicate scalp and hair. It covers key topics such as ingredients to look for, safety considerations, proper application techniques, and recommendations for choosing the best tear-free shampoo for your baby. With this guide, parents can confidently make informed decisions when it comes to selecting the right tear-free baby shampoo to ensure a gentle and enjoyable bathing experience for their little ones.
What Does Tear-Free Baby Shampoo Mean?
Tear-free baby shampoo refers to gentle cleansers formulated to prevent harmful chemicals from irritating your baby's eyes. Traditional shampoos designed for adults and older children often contain surfactants that produce thick bubbles or foam. While these features make adult shampoos seem "cleansing," they are too harsh for a baby's delicate scalp and sensitive eyes.
Regular shampoos with a high pH level and lots of perfumes, dyes and chemical additives can cause stinging, watering and redness when they wash into your baby's eyes during bath time. In some cases, the skin around your baby's eyes can become irritated too.
Tear-free formulas are specially created for infants with three main benefits:
1. A Gentler Formula
The mildest tear-free baby shampoos contain a formulation of mild surfactants that produces less foam or lather. They also have a low pH level closer to the pH of skin and hair. This allows the cleansers to be gentler and reduce irritation for a baby's sensitive eyes.
2. Less Chemical Irritants
Tear-free baby shampoos avoid harsh ingredients like sulfates, parabens, synthetic fragrances and dyes that can trigger stinging, burning or watery eyes. They are made with simpler, milder ingredients designed specifically for delicate infant skin.
3. Proven Effectiveness
Many of the top brands label their baby shampoos as "clinically proven tear-free." This means the formula has undergone studies and tests to show it causes significantly less eye irritation compared to standard baby shampoos.
While all of these benefits make tear-free baby shampoo seem like an obvious choice, in reality any shampoo has the potential to cause eye irritation depending on a baby's individual sensitivity. Some tips to minimize eye irritation when bathing your baby include:
• Diluting the shampoo with lukewarm water before applying it to hair.
• Gently massaging the scalp in a circular motion and avoiding the face and eyes.
• Rinsing hair thoroughly to remove all traces of shampoo.
• Patting (not wiping or rubbing) eyes dry after the bath.
• Bathing your baby only 2-3 times per week since daily washing isn't necessary.
When choosing a tear-free baby shampoo, look for a formula that is:
• Dermatologist-tested and proven to cause less irritation.
• Fragrance-free and dye-free without harsh chemicals .
• Made with mild, plant-based cleansers instead of strong synthetic surfactants.
• Formulated at a low pH level (closer to 5.5) that matches your baby's natural skin.
• Specifically designed for delicate infants with developing skin barriers.
While tear-free baby shampoo won't guarantee your baby never experiences irritation during bath time, choosing the mildest formula possible can help minimize the risk. When paired with gentle bathing techniques and proper dilution, a true "tear-free" shampoo can make a big difference in reducing eye irritation and discomfort for your little one.
Summary,
Tear-free baby shampoo refers to cleansers formulated to be as mild and gentle as possible on your infant's sensitive skin and eyes. The key is looking for a formula proven to cause less irritation, made with the mildest plant-based cleansers, and tested by dermatologists. Combine that with proper dilution, gentle massage and thorough rinsing, and tear-free shampoo can make bath time a more comfortable experience for babies and less stressful for parents. With the right product and gentle care, even the ittiest bittiest babies can stay clean and cry-free.
submitted by bravebaby_skincare to u/bravebaby_skincare [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 08:54 No_Association_8132 Asian male in CS with Average Stats gets into a T20

Demographics
- Gender: Male
- Race/Ethnicity: Asian, $200k income bracket
- Residence: Texas
- Hooks (Recruited Athlete, URM, First-Gen, Geographic, Legacy, etc.): None,
- Intended Major(s): Computer Science
Academics
GPA/Rank (or percentile): 3.45 UW, 4.1W, top 25%, All A's in Advanced Math and Science classes, but B's in regular English's and history classes
# of Honors/AP/IB/Dual Enrollment/etc.: AP CSP, AP Calc BC, AP Physics 1, AP CSA
Senior Year Course Load: Regular English 4, AP Gov/AP Econ(each is a semester), AP Physics C Mechanics, Multivariable Calculus, Honors Engineering and CS classes
Standardized Testing
List the highest scores earned and all scores that were reported.
SAT/ACT: 1450(790M)
AP/IB: AP CSP(5), AP Calc BC(5), AP Physics 1(4), AP CSA (5)
Extracurriculars/Activities:
Awards/Honors: AP Scholar
Essays/LORs/Interviews: (briefly reflect/rate): I mainly wrote about different events about my life and connected them at the end. I thought my UW Madison supplemental showed a lot of interest in the college. My other supplementals were meh.
Decisions (indicate ED/EA/REA/SCEA/RD)
Acceptances:
Rejections:
Reflection:
Going into this process, I didn't have much hope for a lot of these schools. However, the thing I recommend everyone do is first apply to a safety they would be happy to attend. I did that with UT Dallas, and after getting that first acceptance, that took a lot of stress off of my shoulders. I wasn't too upset about any of the rejections as I knew going in that my stats were below average for those top schools. I was originally committed to Texas A&M, but after I got off the Madison waitlist, I decided to go there. Go Badgers!
submitted by No_Association_8132 to collegeresults [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 08:18 RebelliousCeiling Optional Maths should not be optional.

In all honesty, the maths curriculum for grades 9 and 10 is completely inadequate. It deals with a lot of simple arithmetic: surds, tax and money exchange, compound interest, and population growth/depreciation. It deals with simple set operations too.
The curriculum is heavily centered on geometry and mensuration (which really, is just a branch of geometry too). Geometry is something I appreciate about the curriculum, and in my opinion, it is the only topic requiring tangible thought from the student. The unseen theorems do a fine job of testing the depth to which students have understood, and are able to spot the properties of triangles or circles that they have been taught. Mensuration, on the other hand, is more of a test of memorization than anything. You remember a truckload of formulae that apply to the surface areas and volumes of different solids, and you're good to go. Not to say memorization is bad - it is a necessary part of mathematics, but the vast majority of students have not the slightest where these formulae come from. To them, it's just putting random numbers into a formula, and getting out other random numbers.
In algebra, there's simplification of rational expressions, laws of indices, equations, and HCF/LCM. All of these things, of course, are very useful. However, a lot of these are done purely for their own sake. A problem shall just say, "Simplify the given rational expression", and the student will follow suit, but they have no experience of using this tool in the middle of solving something completely unrelated. When a question says, "Simplify using the laws of indices", an average student will typically solve it. However, he fails to do so when needed to use it in a different context. For instance, while they solve problems in physics, students encounter a lot of exponents. Very few of them are actually comfortable using the laws of exponents to solve said problems.
I appreciate the chapter equations though, it does a good job of teaching students to convert problems from words to numbers, really an essential mathematical tool.
Trigonometry in maths is just a lame excuse of a chapter. It has trivial problems regarding height and distance, which can be done with the easiest of trigonometry. It also touches on finding the area of a triangle using sine. Really, it does not give students any foundation at all with trigonometry. Probability and statistics are frankly treated by the curriculum as unimportant - the content is very simple.
I'm not saying these things are not important. Without the knowledge of most of these, you really can not do *anything* with maths. What I am saying is that this is not a solid enough foundation - it does not prepare students for what is to come in the next two years.
Optional maths, however, builds a much better foundation and will make life a lot easier for you in the next couple of years. (दस सकेपछि तिमीहरुले maths पढ्ने भनेको optional maths मात्र हो! That's what my teacher used to say.)
It covers a lot more, the most important of which, I'd argue, is coordinate geometry. There is a better chance than not that a student who hasn't studied optional maths doesn't know something as trivial as the distance formula. They don't know what the slope of a line is, they don't know what intercepts are. They could not tell you how to find the midpoint of a line segment. They dont't know when two lines are parallel and when they are perpendicular. Hell, they might have forgotten that when they solve simultaneous equations, they are finding the intersection points of two (or more) curves.
Trigonometry covers loads of identities, double and triple angle formulae, reduction formulae, radians, equations, conditionals, and a lot more. You are introduced to limits (not very well, I must admit, but it's enough), vectors, and matrices. You learn sequence and series, linear programming, and graphing quadratics.
I am not saying that it is perfect, but it is a much more complete foundation than maths is. I'd also like to point out it's flaws. It does not teach graphing skills, which are very essential. Again, statistics has been bullied by the curriculum board - it does include mean deviation and standard deviation, but nothing special. Of course, it includes no probability.
My title is a bit clickbaity, and I apologise for that - optional maths should probably not be made mandatory. However, much of the content it covers should me mandatory, and should be transferred to maths, so that it is ensured that students are going to have a smoother transition to next year.
submitted by RebelliousCeiling to Nepal [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 06:11 mgreminger New Feature: Custom Number Formatting

New Feature: Custom Number Formatting
The formatting used for EngineeringPaper.xyz numerical output is now customizable, both at the sheet level and at the individual math cell level. The number formatting can be set by clicking on the settings icon at the top tool bar for sheet wide settings and at the right hand side of the math cell for math cell level settings. Math cell level settings will always take precedence over sheet level settings. When settings differ from the default settings, a green dot will appear on the settings icon. Examples of the notation options available are shown below.
Default Notation
Fixed notation with one significant figure after the decimal point
Scientific notation with four significant figures
Engineering notation with four significant figures
Symbolic notation
Additionally, the precision of the numerical computations has been increased to 64 significant figures. Note that some unit conversions occurs at standard floating point precision (this occurs when using non-SI units and when converting between radians and degrees). This issue will be addressed in future updates.
Many thanks to @JWock82 for submitting this feature suggestion as a GitHub issue.
submitted by mgreminger to EngineeringPaperXYZ [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 05:16 SIGMA920 Road to Singularity Value - Prospective Valuation Pt1

Note: I've done none of the level math myself yet. Link to the BP math here.
The Basics:
Unless something changed it's the usual for a main BP. Nothing new there.
The Good:
  1. The Gerridas seem to be good. Light and fast legs will be pretty good.
The Meh:
  1. The Thyrsus I seems to be very average.
  2. The Pegasus is going to be interesting. While I don't love the idea of a legendary engine without 2 other such engines minimum being added into the game, it's going to be seen more later on.
The Bad:
  1. The way lighters are being distributed is objectively speaking shit. By tying them into BP levels directly instead of having a simple hit max level and all levels afterwards are X lighters, they're directly affecting how much a non-whale can get. The level being capped at 128/129 is nothing new, that's the same as Polar Lights is going to be. But Polar Lights maxes players out at 1460 lighters, Road to Singularity seems to be be maxing for non-whales at ~1300 +/- 45.
  2. The items seem to be extremely lackluster. The Charybdis and Kronos are practically speaking going to be DOA. There's not much of a way to get sugercoat this.
  3. BP chaff is going to be an issue. Link to mnector's post in particular, a single glance at the image in that post shows that the BP is filled with chaff like crates, cosmetics, badges, paints, .etc .etc. This ties into the lighter distribution but it also plays into the issue with the items. For example, the legs are in x2s with a week between them.
  4. The new relic, since it's time limited and requires multiple omamori the reduced uranium cost is a slap in the face. Add in that it looks like it'll be aggressively average and I can't say much good about it.
Conclusion Pt1:
Honestly, this BP is not looking that good. I don't know who decided that this was a good decision but they need to have a face to face conversation with the community as a whole. The best thing I can say right now is that the BP might be worth 10 USD or whatever your currency is for the legs, the engine, and the railgun. Most importantly I wouldn't worry about leveling once you hit ~1000 lighters (At whatever level that is, like I said I've only done some of the math.). The limited crafting means that the standard craftable legendaries will be a rip off, the BP legendaries are a high energy weapon, an engine you'll already get one of, and 2 legendaries that I wouldn't take more than a glance at.
To be Continued in Pt2 on Thursday when the new BP drops and I get around to doing the specifics.
submitted by SIGMA920 to Crossout [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 04:02 FestiveSon_2746 [For Hire] Do you need a pro tutor to help with Accounting & Finance or mathematics? I provide Top Quality assistance in Accounting & Finance. (Corporate, Management, Reporting, Analysis, etc) & Math(Calculus 1,2,3 & Statistics, R studio, SQL, Python)

For Hire
Hdot#6305
Whatsapp - ‪+1 (608) 686‑2825‬
^ I’m a Math expert with professional experience in Finance and Accounting (ACCA, IFRS standards). I have been a part-time private tutor for 6years now and my colleague is an expert in Chemistry & Biochem. We have successfully assisted many students with their assignments, tests, and exams in the following areas :
*Calculus 1, 2, 3, ODEs, PDEs, Complex Analysis, Vector and Tensor Analysis, Discrete Math, Algebra, Real Analysis, etc
*Intro level probability and statistics
*Accounting & Finance (All coursework, Including Case Studies)
*Chemistry & Biochem .
We treat our clients with respect and professional ethics. Don’t hesitate to send me a message if you need any help with any of the subjects listed above or simply
email: [[email protected]]
Hdot#6305
Whatsapp: +1 (608) 686‑2825‬
Cheers
submitted by FestiveSon_2746 to hwforcsh [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 03:57 khoafraelich789 Acura Sports Car: A High-Performance Vehicle For Everyone

Acura Sports Car: A High-Performance Vehicle For Everyone
​
https://preview.redd.it/wijo4lh16i4b1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=0161dcfd40606a7e958eb1674f06a4204d3c0044
The Acura sports car is a high-performance vehicle that is available in a variety of models. The base model starts at $33,950, while the top-of-the-line model can cost up to $156,000. The Acura sports car is packed with features and amenities that make it a great choice for anyone looking for a high-performance vehicle.
​
Honda’s luxury brand Acura is a division of the Japanese company. Only one Acura sports car exists in the world, and it is an excellent machine. With the introduction of the Acura Integra, Honda introduced the world’s first aluminum-production vehicle, as well as VTEC technology. Acura NSX buyers can select from a variety of optional extras as well as standard Acura features. There’s also the NSX GT3, which is specifically designed for race car drivers. This is not a production car, nor is it allowed on a racetrack.
​
Acura TLXs start at $37,700 in 2022 and are extremely affordable for a luxury midsize car. All-wheel drive will increase the price by $2,200. The Acura TLX, which includes the Type S Performance, is the entry-level model. Packages for wheels and tires start at $53,600.
​
The Honda NSX is also known as Acura NSX (North America), and the production year 2005–2022 was followed by years 1991–2005, 2017–2022.
​
The 2022 NSX Type S will come with a Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $169,500, plus a destination charge of $27,500.
​
A NSX – 1st Gen, on average, costs $79,997.
​
How Much Are Acura Sports?
​
There is no definitive answer to this question as prices can vary significantly depending on the model and year of the vehicle. However, Acura sports cars are generally considered to be moderately priced when compared to other luxury brands. Additionally, Acura frequently offers special deals and incentives on their vehicles, so it is always worth checking for current offers.
​
The Acura NSX, the company’s flagship hybrid sports car, costs around $160,000. A 1991 Acura NSX, priced at $62,000, has an Instant Market Value of $91,342 on CarGurus. The NSX’s RWD configuration is popular due to its high performance and low fuel consumption.
​
The Acura Nsx Type S Is A High Performance Sports Car.
Acura’s NSX Type S sports car is a cutting-edge performance model that will set you apart. This car has a 0-60 mph time of 2.9 seconds and a top speed of 191 mph, making it a fitting choice for those who enjoy driving fast. The 2021 Acura NSX begins at $157,500, but many other luxury sports cars have more expensive top trims than the NSX. If you want a car that will leave a lasting impression on people and will handle some of the best track conditions you can find, the Acura NSX is a great choice.
​
How Much Are Acura Nsx Cars?
The Acura NSX will set you back around $28,000. The starting price for the 2022 Acura NSX Type S is $169,500, which is quite high for a luxury sports car.
​
The 2022, Acura NSX has a powerful V6 hybrid engine that can propel it to breathtaking speeds. The NSX’s interior is roomy, its seats are comfortable all day, and it has a longer-than-average warranty. If you’re thinking about an older model, our older model reviews can help you make the best decision. The 2022 Acura NSX Type S has a 600-hp hybrid powertrain combined with all-wheel drive. The Chevrolet Corvette, like the Acura NSX, is a mid-engine sports car. As a result, the Nissan GT-R starts at around $55,000 less than the BMW M3. This is a better sports car than others and a better value overall.
​
The Acura NSX Type S can travel from zero to 60 miles per hour in just 2.9 seconds. The NSX can also be driven silently at low speeds with an electric-only Quiet mode. The interior of a $170,000 car is uncomfortable. The capabilities of the infotainment system are limited, but they are simple to use. Acura NSX has a trunk that measures 4.4 feet long and 9.4 feet wide. There is excellent visibility on both sides due to the thin roof pillars and a low-slung hood. The cabin also muffles road and wind noise in addition to muffling road and wind noise.
​
The Acura NSX Type S is only available in 300 models in the United States. It can go from 0 to 60 mph in just 3.5 seconds thanks to a 600-hp hybrid powertrain, lithium-ion battery pack, and all-wheel drive. The current-generation NSX was released in 2017, and it continues to mix civility and sportiness with its predecessor’s civility. The 2022 Acura NSX Type S is among the best vehicles in its class. Driving fast but relaxing when you pilot day in and day out is exhilarating and enjoyable. Its powerful V6 hybrid system has been described as the most advanced in its class. The issue is that, while the NSX has the look of a luxurious car, it does not offer the level of luxury that it claims to provide.
​
This is an introduction. The Honda NSX is a true sports car, one of the most iconic models in history. It’s not only one of the most expensive, but it’s also one of the most well-known. The Honda NSX is a fantastic driver’s car with an excellent combination of performance and handling. Furthermore, it is a beautiful vehicle with a sleek design that will undoubtedly draw attention. If you want a car that is both reliable and extremely luxurious, you should consider the Honda NSX.
​
How Much Does A 2020 Acura Nsx Cost?
In the United States, the 2020 Acura NSX will retail for $157,500, including the $1,995 destination fee. That is well below the Porsche 911 Turbo S and Audi R8 V10, as well as the Lamborghini Huracan and Ferrari 488 GTB, which are on the high end of the price spectrum.
​
If a 2020 Acura NSX with no options and 12,000 miles per year in clean condition was sold for $110,042, it would be worth around $540,050 in trade-in value. You should deduct a couple thousand dollars for each of the lower two condition levels if the vehicle is in poor shape. If you traded in a 2020 Acura NSX with no options and 12,000 miles per year in clean condition, you could get about $110,042 for one with no options. You can get a more accurate appraisal by going to Edmunds and entering the vehicle’s details, which will give you a more accurate number.
​
The Acura NSX Type S, on the other hand, will not be available in the United States until 2022, according to Acura. Acura has confirmed that the supercar has sold out. There is currently only one NSX model available in 2022 – the NSX Type S, a 600-hp farewell to the Japanese supercar. The 2020 all-wheel drive (AWD) model’s limited weight and 573 horsepower make it a viable alternative to a hybrid. Acura NSXs can travel at a top speed of 190 mph and a top speed of 60 mph in 3.2 seconds. While the Acura NSX is no longer available in the United States, it will always be remembered in Japan. Acura NSX epitomized what a supercar could be, and its legacy will last for a long time after it is no longer available.
​
The Acura Nsx: An Exotic Sports Car Worth The Price
The Acura NSX is an exotic sports car with two people inside. There is a gas-electric hybrid drivetrain in which two electric motors drive the front wheels, a twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6 engine drives the rear wheels, and an additional electric motor drives the front wheels. The base MSRP for the 2021 NSX is $157,500, making it the most expensive model in its class. The NSX, on the other hand, comes standard with a front-wheel drive model, but there are many other luxury sports cars that come with an optional, more expensive interior. The NSX, in the end, is a luxury vehicle with a high price tag that may be difficult to afford for some. Nonetheless, if you can afford it, the Acura NSX is an excellent vehicle to consider.
​
How Fast Is The New Acura Nsx?
​
The new Acura NSX is incredibly fast. It can go from 0 to 60 mph in just 2.9 seconds, and it has a top speed of 191 mph. It’s also very efficient, getting 28 mpg on the highway and 21 mpg in the city.
​
The video above promises a performance upgrade for the Acura NSX Type S that is faster than ever before. In the teaser video, you see a close-up look at the Type S engine, then a shadowed NSX tearing through the night sky. Is it possible to make a car go faster than 60 mph? Will it go faster top speed? Can it lap faster racetracks? Why or why not? The Type S will be introduced during Monterey Car Week in California on August 12. It is expected that only 350 will be built, with production ending in 2022, when the second-generation NSX will come to an end. The NSX Type R was the subject of many rumors in the past about its 650 horsepower (485 kilowatts) engine.
​
A quarter mile time of 14.6 seconds also works well. Because of its all-wheel drive system and ability to take advantage of the traction provided by its tires, this vehicle can achieve this level of performance. Driving the Acura NSX is enjoyable because it is an extremely high-performance sports car. This car has a 0-60 time of 2.5 seconds and a quarter mile time of 14.2 seconds, making it capable of traveling at a top speed of more than 200 mph. Furthermore, the NSX’s all-wheel drive system is designed to handle any terrain or road conditions that may arise. Whether you want a powerful sports car that can handle any kind of driving or a vehicle that can handle any type of terrain, the Acura NSX is an excellent choice.
​
Acura Nsx For Sale
The Acura NSX for sale is a sports car that was first introduced in 1990. It was designed to compete with the likes of the Porsche 911 and the Chevrolet Corvette. The NSX was Acura’s first foray into the world of supercars and it did not disappoint. The NSX is powered by a 3.0L V6 engine that produces 276 hp and 210 lb-ft of torque. It is rear-wheel drive and has a 5-speed manual transmission. The NSX is not only fast, but it is also extremely reliable and has a reputation for being one of the best handling cars on the road. If you are in the market for a supercar, the Acura NSX should definitely be at the top of your list.
​
The car has excellent gas mileage as well as excellent handling and other worldly acceleration. I drove my car 2,300 miles in three days, and I am a 6’4″ tall guy. A car like this is not designed to draw attention to itself by being brightly colored or excessively loud. The supercar character shines in track mode. You shouldn’t play Sport because it’s mediocre and the worst of Quiet and Sport Plus modes. There are numerous ways to consider the NSX’s drivetrain. It has a 3.5-liter V6 engine and two turbochargers on the inside and out. An electric motor is located between the V6 and the 9-speed, dual-clutch automatic transmission.
​
The first production model of the NSX was released in Japan in February 1991 as a result of a collaboration between Honda and Acura. In 1993, Acura began selling the Acura NSX in North America, and it went on to sell in Europe and Asia. Following the suspension of production in Japan in December 2001, Honda discontinued the production of the NSX in North America in March 2002. The Acura NSX Zanardi Edition, a limited edition version of the NSX introduced in 1999, is available only to a select group of buyers. Ayrton Senna, a McLaren Formula One driver who died in a car accident in 1988, was the inspiration for the Zanardi Edition. The Acura brand is marking its 25th anniversary this year with the creation of the Zanaardi Edition NSX, in honor of the memory of iconic driver Alfonso Senna. The Zanardi Edition NSX is a 1999 special edition of the NSX. To commemorate the 25th anniversary of Acura’s inception, the company created a limited edition NSX that pays homage to the memory of late driver Alfonso Assis. The Zanardi Edition NSX is a limited edition version of the NSX that was introduced in 1999. The NSX Zanzaardi Edition is a limited production version that was introduced in 1999. Only 51 Acura NSX Zanardi Edition vehicles have ever been built, making it one of the most rare vehicles. If you want one, you’ll have to be willing to pay a lot of money for it. But if you’re a fan of the Senna and want a cool NSX, this is the car for you.
​
The 2019 Acura Nsx Is A Great Choice For Those Looking For A Fast And Fuel-efficient Car.
Despite its flaws, the Acura NSX is a very fast car. This vehicle can reach 60 mph in just a little over three seconds, and it is one of the most fuel-efficient NSX models on the market, saving more than 50 pounds per mile. If you want to buy a more affordable NSX, the 2019 model should be on your list. It has a starting price of just $150,000, and it has many of the same features as the more expensive model.
​
New Acura Sports Car Models
With the release of the new NSX, Acura is re-establishing itself as a premier sports car manufacturer. The new NSX is a hybrid supercar that features a twin-turbocharged V6 engine and three electric motors. It’s a true technological tour de force, and it sets the stage for Acura’s future sports cars. The new NSX is just the beginning; Acura has plans to release even more exciting sports cars in the coming years. These new models will build on the success of the NSX and continue Acura’s tradition of delivering high-performance vehicles that are also technologically advanced.
​
How Much Will The Acura Type S Cost?
The three-row Acura MDX Type S starts at $67,745 and comes with the same 355-hp turbo V-6 as the TLX Type S, and is available starting next week. The 2022 Acura MDX Type S will be available starting next week at dealerships with a starting price of
​
Acura Nsx Type S Vehicle Type
The Acura NSX Type S is a sports car manufactured by Honda. It was introduced in 1997 as the successor to the Acura NSX. The NSX Type S is a two-door, two-seater coupe with a mid-engine, rear-wheel drive layout. It is powered by a 3.0 L V6 engine that produces 290 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque. The NSX Type S has a curb weight of 3,150 lb and a 0-60 mph time of 5.1 seconds.
​
During Monterey Car Week, the 2022 Acura NSX Type S was introduced to the world for the first time. The model receives an updated version of its 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V-6 and three-motor hybrid engine, as well as an increase in power. Japan is the first country to sell a Type S-badged NSX. Acura’s Sport Hybrid Super Handling All-Wheel-Drive system is still on the sports car. Carbon-fiber roofs are standard and reduce the center of gravity for improved handling. The paint color will be available on 70 of the 350 vehicles manufactured, in addition to Gotham Gray.
​
Source: osvehicle
submitted by khoafraelich789 to CarInformationNews [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 03:24 Street_Procedure_327 I Have So Much I Want to Do in Life, but I just have no Hope or Energy Left.

I fucking hate myself. With a passion. I look back on my entire life with regret. I’m 21 years old and I feel like a lost scared child. My social anxiety is through the roof. Something as simple as going for a grocery run comes with unbearable levels of anxiety related to how others will judge me. Meanwhile, I’m extremely judgmental and I hate myself for that. I grew up without friends. The few that I have made throughout life always seem to leave me or lose interest and have better things to do with their lives. Knowing and hating myself so much, how can I blame them? My entire time in elementary school and high school I ate lunch alone and stood in the corner alone watching other kids play at recess. I’m lonely beyond belief. I just want someone to like me for me, no strings attached. I’ve grown up the product of overbearing parents that spoiled and shielded me from any discomfort encouraging my lack of social skills and life experiences. They are more supportive than anyone you’ll ever meet, but I just end up hating them for it. Their love sickens me. I crave it from anyone else. I blame them for the way I am and I hate myself for that too. I have jealousy for almost everyone I see. Appearance, relationship status, happiness, I covet the whole 9 yards. I hate my appearance. Even after losing 60 pounds and maintaining a steady 140 Ibs, I lack the resolve or energy to build any muscle and maintain a below-average face. I have become a hopeless romantic. I dream of being in a relationship with someone. I feel like it’s one of the few things left that might bring meaning to my life. It’s one of the only reasons I keep going. But my standards are way out of my league and I care too much about physical attractiveness (I am extremely attracted to smaller skinny women which in all honesty are often in the higher leagues of dating) how could someone who hates themselves so much ever be in a healthy loving relationship though? Not to mention that my looks, social anxiety, and lack of independence aren’t doing me any favors. I’ve been around every dating app you can think of for the past 6 months with not a thing to show for it. The one girl I did talk with for a few weeks left without comment as soon as I sent her pictures of my face. (This was on my birthday no less so that quickly turned sour) I’ve been trying like hell to reinvent myself. Back at the beginning of 2022, I became greatly unsatisfied with my life. I realized had I died today my regrets would be boundless, and that in a way they already were. I worked to move out of the terminally online state the pandemic had put me in. Got my first job, started driving, went to community college, and did weekly therapy, heck I even did weekly ketamine treatments, but the hole in my heart just grew deeper. This year I’ve pushed myself to get out of the house and out of my comfort zone more than ever going to concerts, meetup events, and joining a social bowling league, but I’m still stuck in the same pit of loneliness. I feel dead inside like a jealous husk walking among the living. I can see a small improvement but I’m so fucking done waiting. I feel like I’ve worked my ass off and the ends don’t justify the means. If you could tell by now I’m an impatient perfectionist (yes I hate myself for that too) and I cannot accept a mediocre life. My ambitions and expectations for life leave me disillusioned with reality. My problems are nothing compared to others. I feel like a spoiled brat who needs to just accept that the world is full of suffering and life is not fair but I can’t. So what choice do I have? End it all? I have so much I wish I could do in this life. But I also know myself well enough to know it’s all a pipe dream. I’m at the end of my rope, I just don’t know what to do anymore.
submitted by Street_Procedure_327 to depression [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 01:49 DelightfullyNerdyCat Livable earnings being a QHHT practitioner? Lengthy questions & commentary from level one newbie

Can someone make a livable wage to take care of basic needs doing QHHT full time? As in, pay rent/mortgage, groceries, insurances (auto/health/home), and so much more?
I just started the QHHT level 1 course yesterday. The web site said you can make $100k+ a year. I didn't get into the course to only make money or based on some unrealistic expectation of riches. I realize the healing practitioners in the many modalities, as I, want to help people so it isn't necessarily about money. I'm very curious about how practitioners set their fees and if they are full time practitioners, retirees with pensions or other incomes?
Reading the range of QHHT session lengths (from Reddit posts of clients) of 4-16 hrs makes me wonder how QHHT practitioners sustain basic needs, schedule session lengths, and what their fees are. I know Dolores says you charge by the session not hourly.
To be clear I am terrible at math, so my calculations and perspective on how the following works out is likely WAY off. For example,:
$200/4 hr 2 sessions a day 8 hr "working" day 5 days a week
Is $104k/yr.
If you spend all 8 hrs or 16 hrs a day, that takes your earnings way down. Also, because sessions have to be in person, how realistic is it to expect 40 clients a month (2 per day @ 4 hr sessions)? Do practitioners travel as in mobile QHHT to peoples homes? I mean if I compare locations across the country, cost of living, etc, it doesn't seem like you can meet basic needs no matter where you are. I mean will $200/session fly in the Midwest vs. California or NY?
And what are typical fees practices have based on their level? I can't imagine a level 1 charging $200/session right away compared to a level 3.
When I told my husband I wanted.to do hypnotherapy as my next career, he said, "That's a hobby or side gig, that's not something you can consider a financially sustainable career." I was initially offended bec I didn't know enough about QHHT and though 1-2 hr sessions were the standard as with typical hypnotherapy. But breaking it down, I guess I should be happy to someday break even on my investments into the courses? (Especially if I move up to level 3 over the years).
submitted by DelightfullyNerdyCat to DoloresCannon [link] [comments]

2023.06.07 00:47 Umdeuter Strategy Thesis of the Week: This Is The Way To Play Infantry

Oh yes, guys and gals, we're back at this! And when I say "this" I mean: Strategy theses and infantry shananigans (if that happens to be how this word is spelled).
Before we jump in, two additional info sources here.
With the recent buffs to infantry and also a specific meta evolution, I think I figured out a strong way to apply infantry (rather: Longsword) plays.
Disclaimer: That stuff is rather supposed to be thought provoking than 100% true and I'll go for some clickbaitish headline now and then to get the discussion rolling. So, feel free to give your opinion and don't be too angry about me. Also I want to add that my view will, in some cases, not translate into top-level-meta because the time-windows and their use is tighter up there, but with a current Elo of 17xx, my experience should be somewhat applicable for 99% of the player base.\***)*
So, here's the deal. First of all: This is mostly a strat for strong infantry-civs against strong cavalry-civs. (I got quite comfortable wins with Teutons against Poles and with Slavs against Persians, both players were as strong as me.)

Skirm-Opening into Supplies

The strat is to go up 19 pop, open Skirms, focus on eco and then transition into Infantry from there. With Skirms, you are safe against Archer plays while you can skip the Mining Camp. You have the economic advantages of a scout opening without similar risks and you "force" your opponent to skip ranges or at least don't produce many Archers.
Then you can pressure a bit with some [email protected] and Skirms in late Feudal - which can be actually terribly effective, because this is hard to fight and kills buildings decently fast.
And you get a fairly quick Castle Age behind that while already massing your Infantry, so that you hit Castle Age with a big numbers advantage over their Knights and hopefully already good momentum, pushing their base with some Skirms and [email protected].
From that point, they have to decide if they still do the Crossbow-switch, in which case you can just double down on Skirm-production. Or they try to beat you with Knights - people still think Knights win against Longswords, which is the opposite of true if you play it correctly.
I am sure this can be beaten, probably by playing defensively with good Siege micro or even tower defense, but it's far from trivial. (If you want, you can check my games here and here.) You can very easily be surprised by a bunch of 10-20 Longswords, opening your wall in a few seconds and raid under your TCs. If you don't full wall and don't happen to scout the [email protected], your Castle Age transition quickly becomes super messy - with the potential for some game-ending damage right away.

Momentum is Key

What I found before in Infantry vs Cavalry matchups is that you might struggle to get the switch done and actually leave your base and pick fights. When your opponent starts attacking first and you're massing your units at home, then it's hard to ever leave your base, because they can merge with re-inforcements so much quicker and tend to fight with better numbers. They can make a Crossbow-addition any time or annoy you with Siege and Raids. So you might lose the game even when you have on paper the winning army.
With this approach, you take momentum before they make units and keep it up. It's really simple to play, you basically just stream units forward and force them to defend. Even when you get cleared up, you usually get a decent trade and you can reproduce easier. When you can dive their eco just for once, you usually create enough chaos to be ahead in production and then it's comfortable to play.
Important here is that you make good walls before Castle Age hits, which can be held against Knights for a bit at least. Then add just 2-3 Monks at home and you are pretty safe against counter-attacks, so that the Knight's mobility advantage is minimized.
What I just realised: A key advantage is probably that you have map-control in late Feudal which means you have time to set up bigger walls and protect enough space to boom behind. If you don't have the control during the Castle Age transition, you quickly end up in your earlier small walls, don't find ways to expand and run out of farming space or can't access your stone for example. Or your additional TCs are raidable.

How to deal with different openings

A nice side-effect is that you are quite flexible with your Feudal development with this opening. If [email protected] come in, you can start with an Archer and maybe go to Gold quicker, so just play the current standard meta. In the same way you can handle Militias.
In the same way, you are flexible to deal with **Archer-**openings and follow-ups. If you get good momentum against an Archer opening, you may add a few ones yourself to get some damage in. More probable, they will just go into Skirms themselves or add Scouts and in both cases your [email protected] follow-up is a perfect answer.
Against Scouts, you just add 2 Spears in the beginning and you're fine. Maybe wall up early, as your build is not too tight anyway. I guess you might get into trouble against Scout-Archer-plays, it's micro dependend. But then again, you probably can just go into Skirm-Archer and have the more cost efficient comp. (By the way: In both games that I linked before, the opponents opened with Scouts and then went quickly Castle Age, which on paper seems like the best response, but it didn't work out for them.)
So, the logic is basically: If you start by producing Skirms, you can very easily make additions to that which gives you a competitive army. With defenders advantage, you should be able to hold at least and when the [email protected] kick in, then you can push back and take it from there.

The Macro advantage

What I enjoy the most about the build is how flexible and easy the macro behind it is. I explained in the earlier post a bit more, how to control the eco to get there. Tl;dr: You make many farms.
That means that the eco balance is quite easy as it's almost just a booming-eco. You don't need much on gold, which also means that you can easily buy a bit of gold if necessary. (And btw: For Slavs, Teutons and Vikings (also Poles) that is the best way to utilize their eco bonus.)
Longswords requiring similar resources as villagers basically makes it super easy to switch into a heavy boom or a military all-in if necessary. If you have the army advantage, you can easily add a 4th, 5th TC and super boom behind. If you lose the army advantage and get under pressure, add a 4th, 5th, 6th Barracks, stall out vil production for a few minutes and quickly get back to 30, 40 Longswords.

Diving TC's can be cost efficient

A nice thing is that running Longswords under TCs can actually be cost efficient. That was a privilege of Knights before but now with Gambesons it's the same for Longswords. They get the same pierce armor and per price even a little bit more HP than Knights.
I did the calculation before and forgot what was the exact finding, but against Knights it's just slightly cost efficient to garisson a TC and only when you have Bodkin Arrow. Iirc, with just Fletching it's roughly 50-50 and without Fletching it's not cost efficient. (-> You lose more res by idling your vils than they lose res by losing their Knights.) If someone can add the exact math in the comments, I'll add that here.
And that's only when you assume that all your shots land and that there is no overkill and when you ignore that garissoning often only idles your farms which unbalances your eco quite heavily.
So, basically, since Gambesons you can just run anywhere in an opponent base, raid under TC, don't worry, just reproduce. (Exception: Taking big fights under TCs that can snowball against you if losing.) That makes it easier to play again.

Is that good on top-level?

Obviously, idk. Would like to see it or hear pro thoughts about how that would be beaten consistently. At least we know how MbL tends to get good value from Skirm-openings, so that generally might be something which people underrate because it's not quite clear what you get from it.
I think there is more potential for that when it comes to non-top-Civs, because then up-times are not as tight, which gives you a bit more time window for the farms-spamming and to get the [email protected] going in Feudal and such. So, tournament games will have this naturally less often as the civs tend to be fast paced archer civs, not too many straight cav-plays, not too many infantry-approaches. (In KotD, you just don't have Slavs vs Persians or Teutons vs Sicilians, but you have Mayans vs Ethiopians or so.)
A hint is maybe that Viper recently speculated of Slavs potentially being A-Tier while Hera put them into D-Tier. In the same video, Viper mentioned that Longswords have a place in early Castle Age which is something that he showed in KotD with Malay against MbL.
Perhaps a typical way to deal with it is just play defensively with Archers, wall up, snipe [email protected] from behind the walls and go Castle Age quickly. The type of fast paced clean defensive play which is usually hard to execute for the majority of the player base.
Some more strategy theses: https://www.reddit.com/aoe2/comments/x9em1j/strategy\thesis_of_the_week_gurjaras_are)
https://www.reddit.com/aoe2/comments/rs4vvl/strategy\thesis_of_the_year_idling_village)
https://www.reddit.com/aoe2/comments/z1ht7i/strategy\thesis_of_the_week_never_go_feudal/)
https://www.reddit.com/aoe2/comments/webbap/strategy\thesis_of_the_week_bengalis_are_an/)
https://www.reddit.com/aoe2/comments/qoo82j/strategy\thesis_of_the_week_special_how_good_are/)
https://www.reddit.com/aoe2/comments/w82ybo/strategy\thesis_of_the_week_there_are_two/)
submitted by Umdeuter to aoe2 [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 23:23 JigginsYT A Complete Guide to a Realistic Career Mode on F1 23

Hi everyone, I've been playing the F1 games since F1 2018. I love Career Mode and what it can offer the player. Although many enjoy a casual experience, myself and many others get great pleasure from immersing ourselves fully in the realism aspect of Career Mode. So, if you want a high level of realism from your career, continue reading.

MyTeam or Driver Career Mode?

This is up to you, many enjoy the customisation and imagination of MyTeam but let's be real - the chances of a team owner racing for the team in today's world are minuscule. One way to mitigate this is to well, pretend you're the driver and roleplay separately as a team owner. So for example you could form Andretti Autosport and race as Daniel Ricciardo. After five years, "retire" and be replaced by Andrea Kimi Antonelli, who also happens to spend the next five years at Andretti. You are stuck with your MyTeam team so coming up with realistic scenarios for it can help. Having said that, Lewis I believe is in his tenth year for Mercedes so it's not unheard of to spend that long at one team. If you are doing this driver and separate roleplay as team owner crack, make sure to change the following;
If this isn't for you, pick a driver career mode.

Who Am I?

Whatever version you pick, you need to create a driver. You have some options here;
And well, play accordingly. A rookie won't be as quick in their 1st season as they will be in their 6th. Whereas let's say you roleplay as Daniel Ricciardo, you'll be up to speed from race one. Consider that for feedback too, a rookie should earn fewer resource points than a veteran.

Who do I replace?

Think of your driver and their characteristics. are they part of an academy such as Red Bull (Start at AlphaTauri)? Are they of a certain nationality? Are they experienced or not? Once you've decided on a team, replace the driver you see fit. I replaced Hulkenberg as Schumacher to entertain the idea that that transfer never happened. Just make it realistic (don't go replacing Verstappen, for example)

Settings

Racing The AI

The AI are, well, not perfect. But, you have to deal with them. Here are some tips to race them "more realistically";

Difficulty

Oh boy, all I can say is good luck! I've struggled with this for years. My advice, run a simultaneous career mode where you can "test" difficulty before using it. Difficulty changes track to track, season to season and wet to dry. It's a nuisance, but whatever you do, pick difficulties that represent the story you're trying to tell. For example, Schumacher would be in his 3rd season in my Career Mode so right off the bat I want him to be matching Magnussen in qualy and perhaps beating him in the race. However, I'm error-prone so I will make more mistakes than the average driver.

Going Forward

This part isn't necessary but I find that it's both realistic and extremely fun. First, you'll need to track your standings outside of the game. Here is my spreadsheet I use which you can utilise yourself:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zU4Lo7873cBrd3_gCCCSgQF1Odb6AzK_zzCD5nHJ8FM/edit?usp=sharing
Once you've that done consider, what will F1 look like in 2026, 2030 or 2032? For example in my save I have Audi replacing Alfa Romeo in 2026. How do I do this? Simply swap Alfa for Audi in the spreadsheet. If you have PC mods you may be able to do this in-game along with changing the livery etc but sadly I'm on console. Yes in-game it will still be Alfa Romeo but it's exciting to think they will be Audi from 2026 onwards in my standings.
You can do this for drivers too. If a crap F2 driver joins a team, just pretend it's someone else with better potential, here are some drivers I have picked out;
Or even create "regen" drivers who don't exist in real life, here are mine;
By the time you reach 2032 (the 10th season) very few original F1 drivers should be present. To put it into perspective, Alonso will be 51 in 2032!
​
So there you have it, I hope you enjoyed reading that and found bits to make your Career Mode more realistic and immersive. If you have any tips of your own feel free to let us know I'd be very interested to read them.
Thanks for reading.
submitted by JigginsYT to F1Game [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 23:20 my_name_is_trash Valedictorian bites the dust nearly everywhere, but is ultimately satisfied

Hey all, I apologize for this being long, but I really wanted to be descriptive and thorough about my thoughts and reflections.
Demographics
Intended Major(s): Computer science
Academics
Standardized Testing (weak spot lol)
Extracurriculars/Activities (also weak spot lol)
  1. “Varsity” (lol) robotics all four years – participated in FRC as a programmer and builder; senior year I was also a co-captain
  2. Programming/game design – I simply enjoy programming in many languages and designing basic video games using C# in Unity
  3. Violin – tbh I have no clue why I put this, I began learning at the end of my junior year as a hobby because I liked orchestral music
  4. Service hours – I’ve completed over 130 service hours throughout my time in high school, including religious service, service to the poor, and service to the community
  5. School house leader – attended a school leadership camp in the summer of 2021 (going into my junior year) and then served as a leader and the communications coordinator for my house during my junior year (for houses, think Harry Potter but there’s 10 of them)
  6. National Math Honor Society/Mu Alpha Theta – participated in Catholic Math League and AMC math test competitions, but nothing serious (we just kinda did no practice and took the tests when the days came lol)
  7. Danger of A.I. research paper – wrote a 37-page research paper discussing A.I. and its potential and interviewed a tech professional for my Honors Focus Research course
  8. National Honor Society – pretty self-explanatory (only allowed to join junior or senior year, so I did this for two years); requires 5 tutoring hours each semester
  9. Tutoring – basically tutored kids in math and computer science a lot, especially this one kid in cs basically every week during my junior year
  10. Senior GOYA (Greek Orthodox Youth of America) community member – basically a member of my Greek Orthodox Church’s youth group and met for activities (liturgical/worship services and discussions/fun activities) a few times each month
Awards/Honors
  1. Mathematics department award (sophomore year) – given to one student per grade
  2. Principal’s list every semester (4.0 weighed or above) – a quarter of my grade was on this last year so doesn’t mean much imo lol
  3. School scholars program – about 10% of my grade is in this, requires certain courses to be taken and a certain GPA to be maintained for a scholarship
  4. Graduated summa cum laude – obtained by maintaining a 4.0 weighted and taking extra courses (such as Honors Focus Research)
  5. National STEM Honor Society – member since sophomore year and also school president
Letters of Recommendation
Counselor letter (8/10) – I don’t know much of about the letter to be honest, especially since my counselor and I didn’t really meet much, but I do know she liked me and thought of me as a very bright student, so imma guess above average
AP Lang teacher (9/10 or 10/10) – I first had her for Honors Argumentation & Rhetoric sophomore year; she and I clicked well and I did very well in her AP class junior year, despite only getting a 3 on the exam (not my greatest exam day, and I also rushed a lot on the final essay); she used my essay as a sample across all her AP classes once and called me one of the best writers she has ever taught, along with recommending several students from her 22-23 classes to me for writing help
AP Calc teacher (7/10) – calc was hands down my best subject, and I’ve had this teacher for AB junior year and for BC senior year; in BC, I got the highest score on her midterm (I’m pretty sure) and definitely on her final exam in the history of her teaching (which has been going on for about 10 years); I’ve heard though that this teacher typically writes similar letters for good students with just some extra info that pertains to each student specifically, so it might not have stood out compared to the letters written by her for other students
AP CSA teacher (7/10) – similar story to the calc letter; I did really well in the class as the only sophomore, and my teacher has been my robotics coach for all four years of high school, but I know he does a similar thing to calc, where he writes similar letters for each good student but some extra specific information to the student; this might’ve blended in with my friend’s letter, as he applied to similar schools and also requested a letter from this teacher
Interviews
Essays
Overall, I think my essays were pretty strong, and I think my Common App essay in particular must’ve been strong. It was a graded assignment for my AP Lit class, and I got an A on it after months of working on it (my AP Lit teacher was a strict grader). I wrote a story about a student I tutored in cs a lot and sprinkled coding metaphors throughout. As for supplementals, some of them I spent some more time on (a few weeks or even months), some of them I spent a few days on, and for like a few of them I wrote the day before they were due, but I don’t think they were that bad; I really tried to make them specific to me and engaging, although none of my supplements were reviewed by a teacher or advisor.
Decisions (indicate ED/EA/REA/SCEA/RD)
Acceptances:
Waitlists:
Rejections:
Additional Information (my thoughts and insights):
I’ll share some of my insights really quick. I definitely believe my test scores were a problem, along with my ECs: I didn’t do any summer programs, publish any papers, participate in any real competitions, etc. As for the test scores, I took the ACT three times and the second time was my best; in middle school, I developed a bad habit of spending hours on tests (a strange perfectionistic, double checking tendency) and although it thankfully mostly went away in high school (I do every school test now with no extra time), I still struggle not to get anxious during the ACT and SAT and seem to never finish on time for the reading comprehension portions. After my ACT tries, I had the chance to take the SAT once, which I did, and due to its more lenient timing, I did better than any ACT attempt, but worse on the math. Ultimately, I didn't do early action for any school except for my safety school's honors college (which is test blind) in the hopes of significantly raising my test score before regular decision, which didn't really happen.
Another issue was that my school doesn’t publish rank, so I couldn’t say where I was ranked in my application; additionally, it wasn’t until after applications were sent that I was confirmed to be ranked 1st/valedictorian.
Overall, life hasn’t been a breeze since covid hit in freshman year. I’ve went through much overthinking, a lack of motivation, and even major surgery last summer; in the end, however, I am not as distraught as you may think. I am actually quite happy to go to my state school’s honors college, especially since a lot of my friends are going to the same college. I mentally prepared myself to receive all rejections, so I wasn’t very demotivated upon getting the results, especially because I knew what a lottery these admissions could be.
Anyway, thanks to all of those who took the time to read this, and I hope y’all continue to share your insights and advice with others.
submitted by my_name_is_trash to collegeresults [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 23:19 eldestdaughtersunion How do fundie homeschoolers end up at Harvard? A case study of Baylor University.

[This is adapted from a comment here, but I thought it would make a good post.]
The quality of a fundie homeschool education is typically terrible. We all saw the ATI booklets in the docuseries. Some of us are intimately familiar with the quality of ATI, ACE, Abeka, Bob Jones, etc. So how do these Joshua Generation kids end up at Harvard, clerking for Supreme Court justices - positions that are hard to get even for well-educated, upper-class people?
Because there's a system set up for them.
This was alluded to very briefly in the documentary, when the Christian Homeschool Speech and Debate League was brought up. But they didn't really explain what was going on. So I'm going to do my best to explain it. However, I wasn't actually raised in this community. I was raised adjacent to it. People who lived it, please correct me or elaborate.
Not all fundie homeschoolers totally neglect their children's educations. Many fundies are first-generation converts who have real educations and successful careers outside the home. They may not be well-equipped to educate children, but they do understand what children need to know to succeed in the real world. Part of the reason the Duggar kids are so uneducated is that JB and Meech are also not well-educated. But that's not always the case. Some homeschool kids end up getting pretty rigorous educations, at least by fundie homeschool standards. Especially earlier-born boys. The Jeub family is a good example of a family that is like this. They're highly involved in homeschooling and homeschool speech and debate circles. They produce curriculum and run summer camps. Or at least, they did. Most of this seems to have been scrubbed from the internet, and the Jeubs now run a "glamping" business and don't about Christian homeschooling or debate at all anymore.
Many homeschooling families don't stick strictly to one curriculum. They might use a primary one, but they'll supplement with others they feel are stronger in certain subjects or for certain age groups. One thing they often supplement with, and that is emphasized in some curriculums, is a "classical education." This is an education that emphasizes grammar, logic, and rhetoric. It usually uses classical literature, philosophy, and theology to support this education. Math and science are not emphasized. In a classical education, math focuses on arithmetic, algebra, and geometry. Science is usually limited to the history and philosophy of science, rather than scientific concepts themselves. You might learn about Isaac Newton, you might even read his writings, but you're not actually gonna learn physics or calculus the way you would in a typical education. History is often not explicitly taught, with the justification that the curriculum itself is a historical education.
This emphasis on rhetoric and logic - always contextualized within a Christian philosophy and theology - is where you get Christian homeschool speech and debate. It's very similar to public school speech and debate. Here is the NCFCA's resolutions for LD and Policy debate this year. At a glance, these seem like normal topics. The LD resolution seems pretty typical. You can see where that emphasis on a classical education comes in, but that's not unusual in LD. What sticks out to me are the recommended resources under the policy resolution. They're almost all right-wing think tanks. The other thing that sticks out to me is that they just hand you everything. Topicality, background, relevant sources, and arguments. Even when they're pretending to be promoting logic and reasoning, they're telling you how to think. Think critically - but only within these narrow confines.
The kids who participate in this kind of thing are college-bound. And there are colleges set up to receive them. One such college is Baylor University in Texas. Baylor University is a private Baptist university. It is a "real" college, an R1 research school, and a fairly prestigious one. It is very welcoming to Christian homeschoolers. They have pages on their website guiding homeschooling parents through the process of application, including providing a "transcript" template. (Their example of a completed transcript includes an "apologetics" credit.) They accept the Classical Learning Test in lieu of the SAT or ACT. The CLT is a standardized test based on a classical education, described above. Here's an example test. If you ever took the SAT or ACT, you might notice that this looks a lot easier.
Baylor University caters heavily to this demographic. Their core curriculum includes chapel requirements and courses on theology and scripture, but notably does not include math or hard sciences. They have a "formal reasoning" requirement that can be fulfilled with an Intro to Logic class. It can also be fulfilled with a broad-review "theory of math" class that focuses on mathematical concepts for politics and business, like "the mathematics of elections," population growth models, and compound interest. Their "scientific method" requirement does require science classes, but there's no requirement for hard sciences like physics, chemistry, or biology. You can fulfill it with classes like "Exploring Environmental Issues" or "Earthquakes and Other Natural Disasters." (By the way, that "earthquakes" class is also offered at most public universities in Texas, where it is famously a blow-off class. It's basically just a NatGeo documentary about earthquakes and volcanos stretched across a semester.)
Baylor is a legitimately good school. It is a top choice of school for students interested in going into law. They have a nationally competitive policy debate team, a huge and highly supportive pre-law program, and their own law school with a direct-feeder program. Baylor pre-law students often end up at prestigious law schools, including Harvard and Yale. They also have a large network of highly involved, highly successful alumni. Check out their list of notable alumni on Wikipedia and notice just how long the "politics" section is.
If you are a Christian homeschooler looking to move into the world of law and government, Baylor is gonna give you that opportunity. They will give you the prestigious education necessary to move into that world without ever challenging your religious beliefs or setting you up to fail because your Baptist homeschool education never actually taught you how to do fractions.
I'm using Baylor as an example here because I know it best. There are quite a few universities like this. Wheaton, mentioned in the documentary, is one of them. I'm also using Baylor as an example because it's one of the biggest and most mainstream. You can't throw a rock in Texas without hitting a Baylor graduate. Plenty of normal people, even people who aren't religious, attend Baylor for the quality of the education. Baylor can be a gateway from the insular world of fundie homeschool into the real world.
Baylor is not an option for a lot of fundie homeschoolers. You are probably not gonna survive at Baylor - or even get into Baylor - if your only education was ATI wisdom booklets. (It also has exorbitantly expensive tuition.) But this is a viable way to get slingshotted into the halls of power with nothing but a fundamentalist homeschool education and a Christofascist political agenda.
submitted by eldestdaughtersunion to DuggarsSnark [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 23:07 DamnImJustBored Superelevation Diagrams

Superelevation Diagrams
Is ORD capable of creating super diagrams on P&P sheets like Geopak used to? Figure taken from CFL 4R example plans.
https://preview.redd.it/1t6c940kqg4b1.jpg?width=1502&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b9b10522bf3ed6ddef6bb6b0292451ab648edffd
submitted by DamnImJustBored to OpenRoads [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 19:30 NewAccountMcGee SB228 Individual Curriculae (Scotland) Bill Stage 2 Vote

Order, Order!
We turn now to a vote on SB228, in the name of the Scottish Government. The question is that this Parliament approves the amendments of the Individual Curriculae (Scotland) Bill.
Members are reminded to vote FoAgainst/Abstain. Attempts to stylise a vote may result in it not being counted. Where there is mix-up with an alternative voting style, this shall also be accepted.

Individual Curriculae (Scotland) Bill

An Act of the Scottish Parliament to allow for the creation of individual curriculae for schools, and for connected purposes.
BE IT ENACTED by being passed by this Parliament and assented to by His Majesty as follows--
Section 1: Definitions
(1) In this Act, unless specified otherwise;
(2) The ‘Authority’ refers to the Scottish Qualifications Authority
(3) ‘School’ refers to a state-maintained school dealing with secondary level education as funded by a local authority or directly by the Scottish Government.
(a) ‘Secondary level education’ refers to any school dealing with pupils in S1 to S6, inclusive.
Section 2: Individual Curriculae
(1) Schools may apply to the Authority with a plan for a dedicated curriculum to teach in individual subjects.
(2) The Authority has permission to accept or reject the curriculum if they feel it does not:
(a) Comply sufficiently with instructions from the Scottish Ministers
(b) Deliver a balanced education in that particular subject
(3) When submitting a plan, a school must include:
(a) Details of the content to be taught
(b) Details of how it is to be assessed
(4) The Authority has responsibility for organising the assessed portion of the curriculum and delivering the grade to students on the curriculum.
Section 3: Short Title and Commencement
(1) This Act may be cited as the Individual Curriculae (Scotland) Bill
(2) This Act shall come into force upon the commencement of the 2024/2025 academic year.
(a) Schools may begin preparatory work for individual curriculae prior to the commencement of this Act
This Act was written by the Rt. Hon. Sir Frost_Walker2017, Duke of the Suffolk Coasts, Cabinet Secretary for Education on behalf of the Scottish Government. It is inspired by Section 6 of the Exam Board Reorganisation Act 2022.
Opening Speech:
Presiding Officer,
I rise in support of this bill. In our Programme for Government we pledged to introduce a mechanism to allow for schools to create exam curriculae on a subject by subject basis, and this is the bill to allow that.
It is important that schools have the freedom to teach their specialties. While there may be benefits to a more centralised system in ensuring uniformity and that proper comparisons can be made between students and schools, an overly centralised system risks punishing schools for innovation and using their specialty knowledge to help students learn.
The administering of the system by SQA ensures that broadly standards can remain the same across individual curriculae. If schools were able to set their own assessment procedures and were unmoderated, a school could theoretically inflate their grades by making an assessed portion easy. While I of course have confidence that 95% of schools would be honest and not do this, I believe it is important to nevertheless have this safeguard in place.
I hope to see this bill pass swiftly.
Link to Stage 1 Debate

Amendments

A01 (in the name of NewAccountMcGee)

Append to Section 1 the following:
(n) An "approved qualifications provider" refers to a provider of qualifications that has been approved by the Scottish Qualifications Authority.
Replace Section 2, paragraph 4 with the following:
(4) The Authority has responsibility for organising the assessed portion of the curriculum and delivering the grade to students on the curriculum, except when such activities would be provided by an approved qualifications provider.
EN: Allows schools to use curricula, such as the IB or EEA qualifications, that wouldn't be marked by the SQA.
Voting on this bill will end at the close of business on 9th of June at 10pm BST
submitted by NewAccountMcGee to MHOCHolyroodCommittee [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 18:11 Merrovech Calculating your own personal EPA

Hey folks, I just wanted to share a gambler's/statisticians trick for calculating your expected payout for any given sequence of actions.The wiki's EPA is (as far as I'm aware) EPA if you have a 100% success rate which is not extremely helpful unless you're able to 100% all the checks.
Note that the expected payouts here are only fully accurate if you've taken an infinite number of actions. When starting out, your earnings will be all over the place and will regress to the mean over time.
The most basic way to calculate your actual EPA is for a single action payout. Your expected earnings are just the decimal percent chance of success multiplied by the earnings on success. Example: 60% chance of 100 echo payout is an expected 60 echo payout.
If you're penalized on failure, you just add the two products together. Example: 60% chance of 100 echo payout and 40% chance of 100 echo loss is an expected payout of 60 echos + -40 echos, or 20 echos.
You can determine the expected payouts for any sequence of actions by adding the expected payout for each action in the sequence. If it's a carousel, where you don't get paid out till the end, you just need to multiply the number of actions needed for the carousel if you've got a 100% chance by 1+decimal percentage failure rate. Example: perfectly completing a carousel takes 10 actions and you have a 60% chance of success. You will need 10*1.4 or 14 actions.
If you're planning to sit down for a long grind and expect your skill to increase along the way, I've unfortunately got nothing. You'd have to create a logistic growth model for your skill level and then derive a formula to unify your skill growth and expected payout to come up with an "expected payout after n actions" model which is more math than I'm willing to do at the moment
Hope this helps some folks with determining whether it's better to take a 100% chance low payout or <100% chance high payout action
submitted by Merrovech to fallenlondon [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 17:31 Kadkata_the_Great Tips on climbing with Gwen and her role in the team.

https://u.gg/lol/profile/eun1/lmperatooverview
Hello, I am a Gwen main that recently hit Masters for first time playing on a 10 years old forgotten by the MMR gods account with abysmal LP win-lose ratio bringing it up from Bronze to Masters in 457 games with 57% WR overall and 62% WR on Gwen from 301 games. This post has few purposes:

BAD takes that you should not follow

Key concepts that you have to understand to make this playstyle work for you

Tricks that you might or might not be aware of:

Build

CORE ITEMS:

Riftmaker

Nashor's Tooth

Rabadon's Deathcap

I build in this order in >90% of my games. Go Nashor first if splitpushing is going to be completely uncontested. Start Doran's Ring unless its against a lot of poke in which case go Doran's Shield. Do not buy HP Pots, only buy refillable.

FOLLOW UP OPTIONS:

Cosmic Drive Good AP, CDR, speed. Frequent build after Rabadon.
Void Staff When more than a few enemies have MR items. Overall increses damage. %pen is strong. Frequent build after Rabadon.
Lich Bane Good for faster splitpushing or nuking their squishies with E->AUTO. I recommend as last buy or sell boots to buy this when you have enough gold at full build.
Shadowflame vs frequent shielding and squishier teams. Good AP ammount and pen. I would buy this against a fed ADC with enchanter support.
Zhonya's Hourglass vs fed AD assassins or generally AD heavy teams.
Morellonomicon vs teams with a lot of healing. I never build this.
Thornmail vs AD heavy teams that also have a lot of healing. Occassional purchase.
Randuin's Omen vs teams that have a lot of damage from critical strikes. Example: Yone top, Yasuo mid and Draven ADC.
Spirit Visage vs teams with a lot of AP damage and prolonged fights. I do not build.
Force of Nature vs teams with a lot of AP damage. Generally better than Spirit Visage.
Abyssal Mask Great cheap item vs a lot of AP damage and when you have 2-3 AP on yours.
There are other items that could work like Wit's End or Death's Dance but it is extremely rare that it would be a better choice than any of the items above.

BOOTS:

I have bought all boots on Gwen except mobility boots. It is very dependant on enemy champions and how ahead I am. Usually I buy Mercs into a lot of CC, Steelcaps into AD heavy teams and Lucidity boots if I am very ahead.

RUNES AND SUMMONER SPELLS:

These runes will be most useful to you in majority of games. Swap armor and MR runes depending on your matchup. Go Second Wind instead of Conditioning vs poke matchups like Teemo or Gangplank. I like to pick Bone Plating against burst champions like Pantheon or Renekton. I climbed from Bronze to Diamond without Demolish, but my climb would have been way easier if I went Demolish instead of Unflinching due to the extra plates it can secure. I take it every game now. Presence of Mind is unnecessary and Triumph enables you to fight multiple enemies easier. It also gives you 20g per takedown extra which at the end of the game if you had 15 takedowns ends up being 300g. In my many games playing Gwen I can recall only a few times I wished I got Presence of Mind over Triumph. If you are nearing 0 mana then shove wave and walk up in river to get green slime plant.
Teleport is too useful not to take every game. For second spell I go Ignite for most games. Take Ghost if the kill pressure on lane is small AND the rest of their team is very mobile/ranged, for example a Malphite top lane with Kalista Rakan botlane, Azir mid and Hecarim jungle. That is a comp that you pick Ghost against. If the enemy team doesn't have a lot of mobility or you have easy lane on top then you should take Ignite. Makes tower dives much easier.

NOTES:

I cheese my games. I play around my enemy's mental and abuse Gwen's strengths. The account I played on was hardstuck Gold for many seasons, sometimes ending in Silver. My mental is not strong, I ran it down many times out of spite towards a teammate. My average vision score is 2x lower than that of an average Iron player. Despite all this my climb was steady with the exception of spending a decent ammount of time and games in D1, because I relaxed too much in my games. My point is that if I manage to climb like this, so can you. Just follow the template each game:
If I think of something else I will add it in an edit.
submitted by Kadkata_the_Great to GwenMains [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 17:25 girlbossmandarin Chance me: INTL for Cornell(CAS) ED

Demographics: Black female, living in Sub-Saharan Africa, low income I think. Eriterian
Intended Major(s): Gender Studies or CS
SAT: 1470 ..planning to improve to 1500 +
TOEFL:117
parents contribution:10-15k per year
Grades: Three B's esp in senior year,rank 8th of 194 ppl(did not submit),96%,94%, 95% and 94% average,no aps or ib classes(school doesn't offer them)
Awards: Regional Award for Girls ranking top 5 of their class,Acdemic honor roll,Academic Ranking Award....a bunch of school level math competition awards,..oh and like an innovative person Award for a club i launched senior year
ecs:
- Published Ebook (Guide to Game Design/teaching kids basic CS w gender neutral imagery ),presented this ebook by leading a workshop with elementary school kids teaching them how to code,all profits from this book are directed towards a women's charity in our community
- Runs a scientific dissemination blog, (CS research related),own the blog,mobilized 6 writers and 6 editors all of which are women interested in STEM,daily uploads,5000+monthly viewership
- Launched a free voluntary tutoring program in my senior year for middle and high school girls in STEM*,gained school wide recognition for this ig
- Gender club President for two years,had fundraisers for a nearby women's charity,organized debates...standard stuff
- CS club president for 3 years,increased the number of girls in the club by like 15 and club was lacking attendance,heavily advertised and brought in members,we have done a bunch of projects -two month summer internship at a renown women's ngo...don't really know too much ab this - summer volunteer for ab two years at the same women's charity we donate to w the club -i've taken a bunch of online coding courses and developed a bunch of games...seems tiny but i really enjoyed it -and I write for genzher magazine about once a month,and have gotten a reasonable amt of recognition from that as well
Letters of Rec:
so there's the counselor one and shesaid i had a great application but Idk
1st teacher: 8/10,2nd teacher:10/10 lowkey,3rd : head of charity org 10/10,maybe another one from my internship not sure yet
CA essay about how my mom and grandma didn't get a change to learn and like my move of learning
(KIND OF IMPT SIDENOTE:I applied here this year RD and got waitlisted)
submitted by girlbossmandarin to chanceme [link] [comments]

2023.06.06 17:21 Stonethacrow AP per sphere level graph/chart?

I would like to know the exact amount of AP per sphere level to determine how much time is worth farming the liki. I got 19 total for kimari after @5 hours with no haste and 5 cheers on the boys(with a pretty consistent pace of staring and mashing x when appropriate). He started the battle with zero so I measure off of him. I don't want to farm another hour if I'm only going to get one or two more sphere levels. I would like to try to calculate the point at which it takes more than 15 minutes to get one sphere level and stop my grind there. All I can find is this formula and 'I no good math 😞' Does anyone know of a chart that exists or is it possible to make one easily in Excel?
submitted by Stonethacrow to finalfantasyx [link] [comments]