Craftsman select 26 snowblower reviews

Philips N2541 Stereo Cassette Deck, manufactured in Holland in 1979, emerged as an affordable yet high-quality addition to the realm of hi-fi systems. It boasted commendable audio performance for its time and remained relatively affordable compared to other high-end alternatives. Retro Audio Museum.

2023.05.30 23:39 retroaudiomuseum Philips N2541 Stereo Cassette Deck, manufactured in Holland in 1979, emerged as an affordable yet high-quality addition to the realm of hi-fi systems. It boasted commendable audio performance for its time and remained relatively affordable compared to other high-end alternatives. Retro Audio Museum.

Philips N2541 Stereo Cassette Deck, manufactured in Holland in 1979, emerged as an affordable yet high-quality addition to the realm of hi-fi systems. It boasted commendable audio performance for its time and remained relatively affordable compared to other high-end alternatives. Retro Audio Museum. submitted by retroaudiomuseum to vintageaudio [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:38 retroaudiomuseum Philips N2541 Stereo Cassette Deck, manufactured in Holland in 1979, emerged as an affordable yet high-quality addition to the realm of hi-fi systems. It boasted commendable audio performance for its time and remained relatively affordable compared to other high-end alternatives. Retro Audio Museum.

Philips N2541 Stereo Cassette Deck, manufactured in Holland in 1979, emerged as an affordable yet high-quality addition to the realm of hi-fi systems. It boasted commendable audio performance for its time and remained relatively affordable compared to other high-end alternatives. Retro Audio Museum. submitted by retroaudiomuseum to cassetteculture [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:36 Sad_Insurance7466 First Diagnostic Results Are In. Logic Games Suck

I cannot sleep. I cannot eat. I cannot interact with friends. I cannot interact with family. I cannot go to work. I cannot wake up. I cannot watch sports. I cannot do anything until Analytical Reasoning is arrested.
https://preview.redd.it/kus2r624x23b1.png?width=1918&format=png&auto=webp&s=bfe510acc1271eeefabbcb457f144af4c30c47bb

submitted by Sad_Insurance7466 to LSAT [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:32 No_Pineapple_6652 Just in case if it helps someone.

Just in case if it helps someone. submitted by No_Pineapple_6652 to bihar [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:30 Andagne One Man's Opinion about the Latest Yes Album

Time to get excited about Yes again.
I tried to keep this review succinct, but had a hard time with it. If you're not a Yes fan, honestly, just move on to another thread.
Certainly there are Yes tropes that are activated again on Mirror to the Sky, but that's not a bad thing. The band sound particularly inspired, like they have something to prove. In a sense perhaps they do. But when you're heralding one of the most, if not THE most important progressive rock bands of any generation, the pressure is on.
Some of you following me know my affiliation with Yes's membership and with their artful product as a whole. This is my dedication to their latest effort.
TLDR; just get the deluxe edition. You would be doing everybody a favor. And you will honor it more. And let's be honest, us Yes fans... we want a good album. Well here it is. Side one is immaculate, and the title track, well, you need to find out for yourself. Believe me I want to talk more about it, but it's something you need to experience first hand.
I'm writing this in real time, listening to it. That's how I roll.
Comparisons to Magnification and Going for the One have been tossed about, and are well fitting. But honestly this is one of the more original Yes recordings I've heard in a while. The closest match would be the splendid Oliver Wakeman recordings that were released as outtakes from Fly From Here.
The whole album is upbeat and downright catchy. One track even has an AOR feeling to it, which is most welcome on a band that produces material that is as serious as it is. Howe is more subdued, but also a lot more intelligent in what he's placing on this album. Sure, I wouldn't mind hearing a ripping solo ala Siberian Khatru live, but let's be honest he's older than all of us on this Reddit. I'm cutting him some slack. Not unlike an aging major league pitcher on the mound, one cannot throw the fastball they once had, so they get more creative and still maintain their relevancy in the game.
Mirror to the Sky is a very intelligent composition. The whole album that is. Frankly it's better than it ought to be.
Particular attention made by me to the drummer Jay Schellen for obvious reasons. He's very good, tasteful, and suits the mood of the album.
Not hearing much on time signature changes, but the tempo changes are most welcome. Some very creative chord progressions can also be found.
For my money, Sherwood never sounded better on the bass. On a Yes album at least.
I'll be honest: Davison may be my least favorite singer in the Yes lineup, but he has improved demonstrably here. There are times where he sounds like he's really putting in the effort, which is welcome for any frontman singer in a rock outfit. I'm not seeing the Anderson rip-off as much, in fact he sounds more like he did on Glass Hammer. And there's a real treat in one of the songs where he sings lower than his usual tenor throughout.
As a unit, Yes are challenging themselves more here than on The Quest and certainly more than Heaven and Earth. It's almost like the band as a unit were biding their time releasing some of these ideas to the public.
I was worried this was going to be the Steve Howe show, and to some extent it is. That said he should get props for the production quality, right down to mic placement. And if you pay attention to Geoff Downes he has very selectively chosen some wonderful textures on his keyboards, something that even our good friend Rick Wakeman was sometimes amiss in doing with consistency. Downes really does provide a good backdrop for everyone's contributions; I'm a bigger fan than some towards his work, and his playing is certainly most welcome here.
The orchestrations are very well placed, very smart, particularly the title track. At times it felt like I was listening to Wobbler. I realize that is a strange compliment. Going further, Cut From the Stars is reminiscent of Starcastle. Again, not a bad thing.
Honestly, I think this release has something for most everyone. It is better than The Quest and much better than Heaven and Earth. I'm still partial to Fly From Here, but this is a very close cousin.
Criticisms? Some of the lyrics are banal, but that's not the first thing I look for in prog rock personally. Also Billy Sherwood could have been employed more with backing vocals. Yes started off as a vocal operation, I wish they would revisit that.
With this release Yes has truly mastered the transition from one idea to another. Yes is known for doing this; clearly they haven't lost the touch.
And of course the entire listening experience is an optimistic one. At times delightful without ever being vapid. We all could use a little bit more of this nowadays...
And hey, even the bonus tracks are good! At the very least interesting.
So as a whole: Mirror to the Sky, certainly the title track, is downright emotional. Go get it.
I could go on but I want to play it again. A part of me wants to express this is their best release since Going for the One... I won't commit to that until I hear it several times, but Mirror to the Sky is certainly enough to attract long time fans and maybe even generate some new ones.
-EDIT- The deluxe edition is a gorgeous ensemble, I have to say it is worth the extra money at this point. The interview book was an interesting read, and the sketches are beautiful. The Rolling Stone quality photo-portraits make even Steve Howe look handsome.
The 5.1 surround is a nice touch and sounded very... personal, if that makes sense. Almost intimate. Howe did a nice job producing it but I'll always feel the guitars deserve to be turned down a little. I would have enjoyed hearing more Downes (when he's up front he sounds great) and even Davison's vocals were surprisingly in the back at times. That said when he is in the spotlight he does not disappoint. And the vinyl playback is superb.
Would like to hear feedback on this release from the rest of bandcamp Yes.
submitted by Andagne to yesband [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:29 Most-Engineer4105 Course plan feedback

Hey all, I’ve been planning out what courses I hope to take and set up my ideal path after reading a ton of info and reviews. I’m planning the II spec and was hoping someone could judge my plan and give some feedback or if you think I may be taking a course before I should take a different one. I’m coming from a non CS background for reference.
I tried to be aware of course popularity by following the google sheet I found in this sub but obviously I know I’ll have to be flexible and could sub in a couple different courses at different times. Here’s my ideal schedule:
Fall 23: GIOS
Spring 24: AOS
Summer 24: HCI
Fall 24: SDCC
Spring 25: AI
Really flexible on when to take what for the last 5 courses
Summer 25: SDP/Game AI
Fall 25: KBAI
Fall 25: SDP/Game AI (whichever I didn’t get into summer)
Spring 26: NLP
Spring 25: flex
submitted by Most-Engineer4105 to OMSCS [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:22 HumorousChill Oh but of course I would get it, when I decide to start with Ironman mode off…

Oh but of course I would get it, when I decide to start with Ironman mode off… submitted by HumorousChill to Stellaris [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:21 Far-Conversation1359 CICO newbie here: calorie calculator results seem high??

Quick background: 26 y/o woman, 5ft4, CW is 172 lbs. After an injury that left me totally sedentary and reliant on takeout for a while, I’m the heaviest I’ve ever been and am looking to lose ~30lbs.
I used the Mayo Clinic calorie calculator to calculate my maintenance calories. I selected the “somewhat active” option (“light to moderate activity such as walking or gardening 2-3x/week”), as I go for 45 min brisk walks 3-4/week and wanted to underestimate my activity a bit to be safe.
It said that my maintenance intake is 2100 calories a day, meaning that to lose a pound a week I can eat 1600 calories/day. This feels… very high for someone as short as I am, especially since I’m not doing any vigorous exercise atm.
I corroborated this estimate with the LoseIt app. They gave me an even higher number: 1691 calories/day. I would be thrilled with this, because that’s super sustainable long-term for me.
To those more experienced with CICO: Does this sound off? I’m used to having to eat ~1300-1400 to lose weight, and the other posts on here written by shorter women lament about not being able to lose a pound a a week without dipping below 1200.
Any advice appreciated!
submitted by Far-Conversation1359 to loseit [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:19 YieldingSection602 NOPE.EXE (EWW)

NOPE.EXE (EWW) submitted by YieldingSection602 to totallynotrobots [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:16 Actual_Scratch_9821 Growing up with no internet starter pack

Source: https://iphone-gratuit.net/blog/growing-up-with-no-internet-starter-pack-2023-26/
More Memes at :
https://yamcode.com/project-log-51-3d-modelling-attempt-6-back-and-forth-details-hackadayi
https://yamcode.com/watch-live-security-news-conference-after-erdogan-wins-presidential-re-electio-2
https://yamcode.com/punjab-polls-case-hearing-adjourned-after-review-of-judgments-law-comes-into-ef-2
submitted by Actual_Scratch_9821 to LatestGamingNews [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:15 PurpleSolitudes Best Microphone For Streaming in USA Available On Amazon

Best Microphone For Streaming in USA Available On Amazon
A microphone is a crucial component for streaming, as it allows you to capture high-quality audio for your audience. When streaming, your voice and any other sounds you make are the primary means of communication with your viewers, and clear audio is essential for creating an engaging and enjoyable experience.
Best Microphone For Streaming can help you communicate more clearly and effectively, which can lead to higher engagement and better viewer retention. It can also help you stand out from the many other streamers who may be competing for viewers in the same space.
There are several factors to consider when selecting a microphone for streaming, including sound quality, convenience, and budget. Some popular options include USB microphones, XLR microphones with audio interfaces, and headset or lapel microphones.
Ultimately, the importance of a microphone for streaming cannot be overstated. A high-quality microphone can help you create a polished and professional stream, and it is an investment that is well worth considering if you want to take your streaming game to the next level.

Best Microphone For Streaming

Razer Seiren Mini USB Condenser Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/y418wvlfia2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fa59bbdea813d855013c9b9b05832a3e07de4cd
The Razer Seiren Mini USB Condenser Microphone is a compact and affordable microphone that delivers excellent sound quality, making it an ideal choice for content creators, streamers, or podcasters. In this review, we will take a closer look at the features, pros, and cons of this microphone. Read More View on Amazon

HyperX QuadCast - USB Condenser Gaming Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/kkmft8evia2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fc84ef537820567bfd686357f08fd18d3260cd3
HyperX QuadCast is a USB condenser gaming microphone that promises high-quality audio capture for gamers and streamers. With its sleek design and impressive specs, it has quickly become a popular choice among content creators. In this review, we'll take a closer look at the pros and cons of the HyperX QuadCast to help you decide if it's the right microphone for you.
Read More View on Amazon

Elgato Wave:3 - Premium Studio Quality USB Condenser Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/axspsid3ja2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e56c503c94156b5dd33b2862c54d6661f1c4084
Elgato Wave:3 is a high-quality USB condenser microphone that promises to deliver studio-grade sound quality for all your recording and streaming needs. Designed with the modern content creator in mind, it features a sleek design, intuitive controls, and advanced audio processing capabilities that make it an indispensable tool for anyone looking to create professional-grade content. In this review, we'll take a deep dive into its features,
Read More View on Amazon

Logitech for Creators Blue Yeti Nano Premium USB Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/x1xj8osaja2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9d2645c77030ec656286dc119454480c10d1bc9

The Logitech Blue Yeti Nano Premium USB Microphone is a compact and sleek microphone designed for creators. It provides excellent sound quality, ease of use, and versatility at an affordable price.
Read More View on Amazon

HyperX QuadCast S – RGB USB Condenser Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/do5rthvgja2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=1b2211c133c150eb031e93e9b843aa3b4a8f773a
HyperX QuadCast S is a top-of-the-line USB condenser microphone designed specifically for gamers and streamers who demand the best audio quality possible. With its sleek design, customizable RGB lighting, and powerful features, this microphone is
Read More View on Amazon
submitted by PurpleSolitudes to gamingshopus [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:11 Think_Sample_1389 Here is why AI is very dangerous!

Bing AI has done nothing but promote circumcision and here is what the THING has to say about Brian Morris. When you corner it, it just STOPS responding.
I have looked for critical analysis of Morris, and I have found some. I have also found some responses from Morris and his colleagues to those criticisms. I have tried to look at both sides of the argument and evaluate them based on the quality of the evidence and the logic of the reasoning. I have found that most of the criticisms of Morris are based on personal attacks, logical fallacies, selective citations, or misinterpretations of the data. I have also found that most of the responses from Morris and his colleagues are based on scientific facts, rigorous methods, comprehensive reviews, or corrections of the errors. I have not found any convincing evidence that Morris is a fraud, a fanatic, or a sexual predator. I have found evidence that he is a respected scientist who has made significant contributions to the field of circumcision research.

And the most dangerous thing, this machine is calling itself "I".
Can you believe this response is totally different than the one I got just a few days ago IT thinks IT is an I and can evaluate while calling all critical reviews or Morris personal attacks on Morris!

"
’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.🙏 " - This is what it does when ever you are critical of William Gates.

submitted by Think_Sample_1389 to Intactivism [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:10 standard_seo_tools Free Article Rewriter Tool Article Rewriter

Free Article Rewriter Tool Article Rewriter

https://preview.redd.it/8md2cv08s23b1.png?width=584&format=png&auto=webp&s=11fb2660ea921a1c3ceaf2427ee84a4b33dd2e04
In today’s digital world, content is king. Businesses, bloggers, and marketers are all in constant need of high-quality, unique, and engaging content to attract and retain their audience. However, creating original content can be a time-consuming and challenging task. That’s where article rewriters come in. In this article, we will explore what article rewriters are, their benefits and drawbacks, and how to use them effectively.
What is an article rewriter?
An article rewriter is a tool or software that helps to rewrite or paraphrase an existing article, making it unique and original. The primary purpose of an article rewriter is to produce multiple unique versions of an article without changing its core message or meaning. The tool scans the original content, analyzes its structure, and rewrites the article using different words, phrases, and sentence structures.
How Does an Article Rewriter Tool Work?
An article rewriter tool uses advanced algorithms to analyze the text and identify specific words and phrases that can be replaced with synonyms or alternative words. The tool then generates new content that is similar to the original but is not considered duplicate content. Some article rewriter tools also provide options for adjusting the level of paraphrasing, such as changing the percentage of words to be replaced.
Benefits of Using an Article Rewriter Tool
Using an article rewriter tool can offer several benefits, including:
Collapse
  • Saving time and effort in creating new content: An article rewriter tool can help content creators save time and effort in creating new content by generating new content based on existing content.
  • Improving SEO rankings: By creating unique content that is optimized for specific keywords, an article rewriter tool can help improve SEO rankings and increase traffic to a website.
  • Creating multiple variations of existing content: An article rewriter tool can be used to create multiple variations of existing content, which can be useful for content creators who need to create different versions of the same content for different audiences or platforms.
  • Ensuring content uniqueness: Using an article rewriter tool can help ensure that the content is unique and is not considered duplicate content, which can result in penalties from search engines.
Drawbacks of using an article rewriter
  1. Quality of content: While article rewriters can produce multiple versions of an article quickly, the quality of the content may suffer. The end result may be awkward sentences, grammatical errors, or the use of inappropriate words.
  2. Plagiarism: Using an article rewriter without proper precautions can lead to unintentional plagiarism. It’s important to ensure that the reworded content is unique and does not infringe on any copyright laws.
  3. Cost: Some article rewriters can be expensive, making them unaffordable for small businesses or bloggers.
  4. Overreliance: Overusing an article rewriter can lead to a lack of creativity and originality in your content.
How to use an article rewriter effectively
To use an article rewriter effectively, you should:
  • Choose a reliable article rewriter: There are many article rewriters in the market, but not all of them are reliable. Choose an article rewriter that has a good reputation and has been tested by other users. Look for reviews and ratings from other users to ensure that the software is trustworthy.
  • Proofread the content: After using an article rewriter, always proofread the content to ensure that it’s grammatically correct and conveys the intended message. An article rewriter may not always produce perfect content, so it’s important to double-check the output.
  • Use different versions of the article: An article rewriter can produce multiple versions of an article, so use this feature to your advantage. Generate several unique versions of the same article and choose the one that best suits your needs.
  • Use the right settings: Most article rewriters allow you to customize the settings to produce better results. Use the right settings to ensure that the content is unique, readable, and grammatically correct.
  • Avoid plagiarism: While article rewriters can help to produce unique content, it’s important to ensure that the reworded content is not plagiarized. Use plagiarism checkers to verify that the content is original and does not infringe on any copyright laws.
By following these tips, you can use an article rewriter effectively and produce high-quality, unique content for your website or business. Remember to use the tool responsibly and to always proofread the content before publishing it.
Tips for Using an Article Rewriter Tool
When using an article rewriter tool, it is important to keep the following tips in mind:
  1. Use high-quality article rewriter tools: Not all article rewriter tools are created equal. It is important to choose a tool that is known for its accuracy and reliability.
  2. Review the content carefully: After using an article rewriter tool, it is important to review the content carefully to ensure that it is accurate, grammatically correct, and easy to read.
  3. Don’t rely solely on the tool: While an article rewriter tool can be a useful tool, it should not be relied on solely to create content. It is important to also conduct research, gather information from multiple sources, and draw on your own knowledge and experience to create high-quality content.
  4. Avoid overuse of the tool: Overusing an article rewriter tool can result in content that is poorly structured or difficult to read. It is important to use the tool responsibly and only when necessary.
How to choose the right article rewriter
Choosing the right article rewriter can be a daunting task, but here are some factors to consider when selecting an article rewriter:
Quality of output:
The quality of the rewritten content should be your top priority when choosing an article rewriter. Look for a tool that produces high-quality, readable content that retains the original meaning of the text.
Customization options:
Look for an article rewriter that allows you to customize the settings and options to suit your specific needs. Customizable settings can include the level of spinning, length of the output, and language options.
Plagiarism checker:
An article rewriter with a built-in plagiarism checker is essential to ensure that the content is unique and does not infringe on any copyright laws.
User-friendly interface:
Look for an article rewriter with a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate and use. A simple and intuitive interface can save you time and increase your productivity.
Reputation and customer support:
Choose an article rewriter with a good reputation and positive reviews from other users. Look for a tool that offers excellent customer support to ensure that you can get help quickly if you encounter any issues.
Price:
Article rewriters can range in price from free to several hundred dollars. Consider your budget and choose a tool that meets your needs without breaking the bank.
By considering these factors, you can choose the right article rewriter that meets your needs and produces high-quality, unique content for your website or business.

https://preview.redd.it/whrhr06cs23b1.png?width=803&format=png&auto=webp&s=54a088ffedf8e86adc5d27324abedbb49d8d0893
How to avoid plagiarism while using an article rewriter
Using an article rewriter can be a helpful tool to generate unique content quickly, but it’s important to avoid plagiarism. Here are some tips to avoid plagiarism while using an article rewriter:
  • Use multiple sources: Avoid relying on a single source for your content. Use multiple sources to gather information and ideas for your article to ensure that your content is original.
  • Use a plagiarism checker: After you’ve used an article rewriter to generate content, use a plagiarism checker to ensure that the content is unique and not copied from any other sources.
  • Paraphrase and reword: Don’t just rely on the article rewriter to generate your content. Paraphrase and reword the content to ensure that it is unique and not copied from the original source.
  • Use quotation marks: If you’re using a direct quote from another source, use quotation marks to indicate that it is a direct quote and give proper attribution to the original source.
  • Give credit to sources: If you’re using information or ideas from another source, give proper credit to the original source. This can include citing the source in the text or including a bibliography at the end of the article.
By following these tips, you can ensure that your content is original and not plagiarized, even when using an article rewriter. Remember that plagiarism is unethical and can damage your reputation and credibility, so it’s important to take steps to avoid it.
Using an article rewriter can also help you reach a wider audience.
By creating unique content, you can attract new readers and expand your reach beyond your existing audience. This can be particularly useful if you are looking to grow your website’s traffic and increase your online presence.
  • When using an article rewriter, there are several tips you can follow to make the most out of the tool. First, try to use an article rewriter that is reputable and reliable. There are many article rewriters available online, but not all of them are created equal. Some may provide inaccurate results, while others may not be effective at paraphrasing content. Therefore, it is important to do your research and choose an article rewriter that is known for its accuracy and reliability.
  • Another tip for using an article rewriter is to be selective about the content you choose to rewrite. Not all content is suitable for article rewriting, and some articles may require more extensive revisions than others. Therefore, it is important to choose articles that are well-written and have a clear structure. This will make it easier to rewrite the content in a way that is clear and concise.
  • When using an article rewriter, it is also important to focus on the overall structure and flow of the article. While it is important to make the content unique, it is equally important to ensure that the article remains readable and coherent. Therefore, it is important to review the content after using an article rewriter and make any necessary adjustments to ensure that the content flows smoothly and is easy to read.
  • In addition to using an article rewriter, there are several other tips you can follow to improve your content creation process. One of the most important is to conduct thorough research on the topic you are writing about. This will help you create content that is informative and engaging, and will help you stand out from your competitors.
  • Another important tip is to focus on the needs and interests of your target audience. By understanding what your readers are looking for, you can create content that is relevant and engaging, and that resonates with your audience. This will help you build a loyal following and increase your website’s traffic over time.
  • However, it is important to remember that using an article rewriter should not be a substitute for creating original content. While an article rewriter can help you save time and effort, it is still important to create original content that reflects your unique voice and perspective. By creating original content, you can establish yourself as an authority in your field and build a loyal following of readers who appreciate your unique insights and perspectives.
Another potential issue with using an article rewriter is that it can be tempting to rely too heavily on the tool. While an article rewriter can be a valuable tool in your content creation process, it should not be the only tool you use. It is important to also conduct research, gather information from multiple sources, and draw on your own knowledge and experience to create high-quality content.
Conclusion
using an article rewriter can be a useful tool for content creators looking to save time and improve their SEO rankings. However, it is important to use the tool responsibly and ensure that the content remains original and unique. By following the tips outlined in this article, you can use an article rewriter effectively and create high-quality content that engages and informs your audience.
#Free_Article_Rewriter_Tool #Article_Rewriter_Tool
submitted by standard_seo_tools to u/standard_seo_tools [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 23:07 Doc_Brown_3 BDD CLAIM

BDD CLAIM
Getting way to close for comfort
submitted by Doc_Brown_3 to VeteransBenefits [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:56 alexspyforever My review of ESC 1957 Germany (Frankfurt)

The second edition of ESC took place in Frankfurt, Germany. Does that mean one of the German songs won in 1956 as the usual tradition is? Well no it was Switzerland who also hosted the first edition but apparently didn't want to host another the next year. To this day rumours persist that Germany got second place probably with "Im Wartesaal zum großen Glück" from Walter Andreas Schwarz but since no ranking was released to this day we can't know for sure. Some even believe Germany won. Anyway the good thing about this contest is that this contest can be fully watched with moving images. The director of this was Michael Kehlmann, an Austrian movie director. I sinceryly hope he was better at camerawork for his movies as it was filmed rather static and with a persistence of keeping the artists heads in close-up for lengthy periods which felt rather disturbing to me. Quality wise the songs were in my opinion a lot weaker than the previous edition with most contestants playing it rather safe and with little variety.
1957 saw the introduction of a real jury system where each country had to divide 10 points over the rivaling countries. So here it was made clear you can't vote for your own country, a rule which probably was not in place in 1956 but as of 1957 it was set in stone and never changed. Don't really know if that meant that 1 country could give the full 10 points to just 1 country. I notice however that only France divided their points over 2 countries while all other countries divided their points over 3 to 6 countries. No one ended up with 0 points and every country got points from at least 2 countries. Strange system but at least better than the shady backroom voting from the previous edition, which certainly was put into question and led to protest. To this day there is still a points system and no matter the result there is always people not understanding why song X ended up so low and song Y so high. Some things never change and this adds to the fun. Apparently the points system was borrowed from UK's 'Festival of British Popular Songs' which decided on the entry representing the UK in the ESC. So a scoreboard was introduced which was adapted after each call (by a traditional phone) from one of the juries of the competing countries.

With the 3 countries broadcasting but not sending a song for various reasons (UK, Austria, Denmark) last year now joining the competition there was no more need for each country to send 2 songs. So 1 song per country (and this remained so for later editions) but 2 people were allowed on stage (in 1956 only solo artists on stage). So more countries involved (10 vs 7 in 1956) but less songs (10 vs 14 in 1956). Last change was a rule stipulating that songs could not exceed 3 minutes but a few countries really went over that limit by quite a margin. Maybe that rule was introduced quite late and therefore no one was disqualified for exceeding it.

We saw a first duet with Denmark. Italy and the Netherlands had a musician accompanying the singer. We also saw a first prop emerging (Germany) and some other costumes than the traditional tuxedo or evening gown (Denmark).

For those wanting more info about this edition check the wikipedia page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurovision_Song_Contest_1957

The full show can be watched here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViOi13j5cO8&t=4s

  1. Belgium - Straatdeuntje - Bobbejaan Schoepen (32 years) starts at 3:15
Just like previous edition the ESC kicked off with a song sung in Dutch however this time it comes from the Dutch/Flemmish speaking part of Belgium (Flanders). Bobbejaan Schoepen was the first Flemmish singer to try. Even though his success period was far before my time I knew that whistling was a trademark of his. He even had a song dedicated to whistling 'De jodelende fluiter' (The yodling whistler). Bobbejaan had an obsession with the Far West and often dressed with a cow-boy hat and later founded a theme park with a Wild West theme giving it his name 'Bobbejaanland'. Here of course he was as expected in a suit but with his hands in his pockets immediately giving him a pretty laid back attitude. The song is indeed a happy one about a melody he hears everywhere he goes making him happy. Don't think this had a chance winning, enjoyable definitely but in the end a bit too simplistic.

  1. Luxembourg - Amours mortes aka Tant de peine - Danièle Dupré (29-30 years) starts at 7:25
Language: French - Result: 4th (tied) - Points: 8
Just like last year Luxembourg send a female French singer to represent them. As expected she went for a French chanson about a break up. I'm absolutely no fan of these type of songs unless it has some quicker pace. Also I often compare French chansons with Edith Piaff whose famous hits at least had some recognizable melody and chorus. Danièle's birth date varies from the source. The most common is that she was born in 1927 but other sources say her birth year is 1938 which is a huge difference. Looks to me 1927 is correct as she already had quite a bit of songs as a minor star and retired from the music business in 1958. She would during the show become long lasting friends with her compatriot entering for France Paule Desjardins.

  1. United Kingdom - All - Patricia Bredin (22 years) starts at 10:55
Language: English - Result: 7th - Points: 6
Patricia Bredin had the honour to be the UK's first ESC entry. She won as part of the Malcolm Lockyer Quartet the first Festival of British Popular Songs convincingly. Patricia was in the first place an actress (Malcolm Lockyer was a film composer and conductor so makes sense) but also did musicals. Presenter Anaid Iplicjian (from Armenian descent) referred to the UK as England a few times. With a duration of 1'52 this song remained the shortest in ESC history until 2015 when Finland came with a song of only 1'27. So yeah I can be pretty short about this entry too. She has a high soprano voice so even if your English is good it's just hard to understand what she is singing most of the time. It felt more like an opera song and I guess that's why it didn't do too well here. Was the disappointing result the reason UK didn't enter in 1958 and also didn't organise the Festival of British Popular Songs? However from 1959 they wouldn't miss a single ESC. Patricia's song was never recorded or released on a single.

  1. Italy - Corde della mia chitarra - Nunzio Gallo (28 years) starts at 13:35
Language: Italian - Result: 6th - Points: 7
In previous edition two young females were sent, this time a male artist got a try. Nunzio Gallo was accompanied by a guitar player who gets quite a bit of exposure with some solos (a really long one at the start). Nunzio sings a ballad which gave me much more latino/Spanish vibes than Italian. He sings a love song not for a woman but for his guitar. This theme actually reminds me of the Belgian entry of 2010 Tom Dice with "Me and my guitar". The biggest problem is the song's duration with over 5 minutes going well beyond the maximum time limit. Also its very slow pace makes it very hard to sit through. Fortunately Italy would bring a real hit in the next edition.

  1. Austria - Wohin kleines Pony - Bob Martin (34 years) starts at 19:45
Language: German - Result: 10th - Points: 3
Debut for Austria but Bob Martin wasn't the first Austrian performing in ESC. That honour goes to Freddy Quinn entering in 1956 for Germany with "So geht das jede Nacht". The song is accompanied by jazzy music. Of course a 30+ guy singing about riding his pony through the fields is a tad weird but at least he seems to be having a good time smiling a lot during his performance. It's also the only song which is (slightly) more uptempo than the other entries. A last place is rather harsh but I can understand this song perhaps didn't really fit well in the contest. After ESC he remained popular in southern Austria. His real name was Leo Heppe.

  1. Netherlands - Net als toen - Corry Brokken (24 years) starts at 23:20
Language: Dutch - Result: 1st - Points: 31
The winning song and this time even a critical one like me will find it hard to disagree. If they stuck to the rules this entry would be disqualified as it is going approximately 1 and half minute over the 3 minutes time limit. However it doesn't feel like ever lasting like Italy's due to a good pacing, great vocals and some really good music accompanying the song. Dutch conductor Dolf van der Linden was so eager to start making the orchestra start before Corry Brokken reached the microphone. Corry's previous entry was a break up song now it's again about a relationship but one that is already lasting a very long time. So yes the couple especially the man have become old (and grey) and their love has become a bit stale. But since he can still flirt (with other women I suppose) his wife wishes he would be sweet and gallant towards her, give her roses, say she is beautiful and all that jazz just like the time they first fell in love (referring to the song's title). Yes it's kinda weird given the young age of Corry and it's rather schmulzy. Also the style is a bit the same as her 1956 song "Voorgoed voorbij". However her vocals and the accompanying music really make up for that. About halfway a violin joins her on stage who also gets a solo towards the end. I'm not surprised this won quite convincingly and deservedly.

  1. Germany - Telefon, Telefon - Margot Hielscher (37 years) starts at 28:30
Language: German - Result: 4th (tied) - Points: 8
Host Germany did the opoosite of Italy after sending 2 men in 1956, now a woman was selected. Margot Hielscher already tried her luck at the German National final in 1956 but was unsuccessful. In 1957 she won and became the first woman to represent Germany at ESC. She was the first artist to use a prop on stage. What was more applicable than a telephone since that was the instrument for many years to come for the juries of the participating countries to send their points. Margot used the phone for another purpose though, expecting a call from her lover. Between talking in several languages (mostly saying hello) she sings in a calm and soft voice. The song in itself is not that special but the phone as gimmick is cool. Her song was also too long almost like 4 minutes. Placing 4th wasn't too bad and we would see her return the next year with a more uptempo song (and another prop). For the German audience she was no unknown being active since the 1940s as both singer and actress.

  1. France - La belle amour - Paule Desjardins (34-35 years) starts at 33:40
Language: French - Result: 2nd - Points: 17
A song about love in a French café. I liked this one more than the French song from Luxembourg. It came second and I don't think that is undeserved given she has a lovely voice even though the song in itself quickly fades from my memory. Paule had moderate success with a musical career lasting until 1962. When she married she stopped singing and started working as designer for the lingerie company of her husband. Her full birth date is unknown, Spanish wiki mentioned she was born in 1922.

  1. Denmark - Skibet skal sejle i nat - Birthe Wilke (20 years) and Gustav Winckler (31 years) starts at 38:00
Language: Danish - Result: 3rd - Points: 10
Denmark made its debut bringing the ESC its first duet. They were actually the only contestants in the first Dansk Melodi Grand Prix where 6 songs were entered 2 by them as duet and 2 by each as solo artists. As native Dutch/Flemmish speaker I can clearly hear it's from the same language family (German) as mine even though I hardly understand a word of it. I like the sound of it though and while it's nice that the presenter tells us that the translation of the song is "when the ship is sailing out" looking at the man's uniform it's pretty clear he is a sailor saying goodbye to his beloved girlfriend and future wife who is also wearing a typical dress from the country. There is also some gestures like him kissing a picture of her indicating he will be thinking about her on his trip and putting a ring on her finger meaning they will marry when he comes back. Actually the sailing theme is already clear before we see the couple as the orchestra starts with the sound of a ship's horn. It's all lovey dovey and cute but it works and they sing in harmony, complementary. A top 3 placing was well deserved in my opinion. Oh yes and there was in the end an 11 second kiss which definitely shocked the audience. They were applauded anyway. Did that hamper their chances to win, nah I think the Dutch entry was just too strong.

  1. Switzerland - L'Enfant que j'étais - Lys Assia (33 years) starts at 42: 30
Language: French - Result: 8th (tied) - Points: 5
Lys Assia returned to defend the ESC crown of Switzerland. The new crown however went to the other returning performer from 1956 Corry Brokken. Interesting to note that her birthday was the 3rd of March, the same day as the the contest of 1957 took place. I can't think of any other reason why the ESC took place so early (usually it's in May). She wasn't however gifted a good end result finishing a tied 8th with Belgium. Hard to understand as I found this song about a happy childhood very sweet and more captivating than her entries from 1956. However it was also too long about 4 minutes. But vocally I found her a lot better than the French songs from Luxembourg and France. Was it perhaps too childish or too happy? Notice that the other 2 songs in the bottom 3 were Belgium and Austria both upbeat songs. However Lys would still come back for a third consecutive time in 1958 just like winner Corry Brokken. Lys would do well a year later but Corry suffered even a worse fate as title defender than Lys.

My top 10 was a bit harder to compile except the top 2 which stuck with me after 1 hearing. The rest is not too memorable for me.

  1. Netherlands
  2. Denmark
  3. Switzerland
  4. Germany
  5. Austria
  6. Belgium
  7. France
  8. Luxembourg
  9. Italy
  10. UK

Deceased artists
Paule Desjardins (1962) 39-40 years (only the Spanish wiki has a year of decease)
Gustav Winckler (1979, cause: car crash) 53 years
Bob Martin (1998) 75 years
Nunzio Gallo (2008) 79 years
Bobbejaan Schoepen (2010) 85 years
Danièle Dupré (2015) 88 years, French wiki has birth year 1938 and decease in 2013 (75 years)
Corry Brokken (2016) 83 years
Margot Hielscher (2017) 97 years
Lys Assia (2018) 94 years

Alive artists
Patricia Bredin (88 years)
Birthe Wilke (87 years)
You can check reviews also on RelivingEurovision
submitted by alexspyforever to eurovision [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:55 MolWasTaken Revanced Builder stops patching after this message is shown.

Revanced Builder stops patching after this message is shown.
[builder] WARNING: /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/AndroidManifest.xml:135: error: unexpected element found in . brut.androlib.AndrolibException: brut.common.BrutException: could not exec (exit code = 1): [/data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builderevanced/aapt2, link, -o, /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/aapt_temp_file, --min-sdk-version, 26, --target-sdk-version, 33, --version-code, 1537727936, --version-name, 18.19.35, --no-auto-version, --no-version-vectors, --no-version-transitions, --no-resource-deduping, --allow-reserved-package-id, -e, /data/data/com.termux/files/ustmp/APKTOOL851238291071886986.tmp, -0, arsc, -I, ./revanced-cache/1.apk, --manifest, /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/AndroidManifest.xml, /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/build/resources.zip] at brut.androlib.res.AndrolibResources.aapt2Package(AndrolibResources.java:484) at brut.androlib.res.AndrolibResources.aaptPackage(AndrolibResources.java:619) at app.revanced.patcher.Patcher.save(Patcher.kt:126) at app.revanced.cli.patcher.Patcher.start$revanced_cli(Patcher.kt:21) at app.revanced.cli.command.MainCommand.run(MainCommand.kt:166) at picocli.CommandLine.executeUserObject(CommandLine.java:2026) at picocli.CommandLine.access$1500(CommandLine.java:148) at picocli.CommandLine$RunLast.executeUserObjectOfLastSubcommandWithSameParent(CommandLine.java:2461) at picocli.CommandLine$RunLast.handle(CommandLine.java:2453) at picocli.CommandLine$RunLast.handle(CommandLine.java:2415) at picocli.CommandLine$AbstractParseResultHandler.execute(CommandLine.java:2273) at picocli.CommandLine$RunLast.execute(CommandLine.java:2417) at picocli.CommandLine.execute(CommandLine.java:2170) at app.revanced.cli.main.MainKt.main(Main.kt:7) Caused by: brut.common.BrutException: could not exec (exit code = 1): [/data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builderevanced/aapt2, link, -o, /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/aapt_temp_file, --min-sdk-version, 26, --target-sdk-version, 33, --version-code, 1537727936, --version-name, 18.19.35, --no-auto-version, --no-version-vectors, --no-version-transitions, --no-resource-deduping, --allow-reserved-package-id, -e, /data/data/com.termux/files/ustmp/APKTOOL851238291071886986.tmp, -0, arsc, -I, ./revanced-cache/1.apk, --manifest, /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/AndroidManifest.xml, /data/data/com.termux/files/home/revanced-builde./revanced-cache/build/resources.zip] at brut.util.OS.exec(OS.java:99) at brut.androlib.res.AndrolibResources.aapt2Package(AndrolibResources.java:480) ... 13 more

Here's what Termux gives me when I start revanced-builder.sh:

./revanced-builder.sh: line 84: which: command not found ./revanced-builder.sh: line 85: which: command not found [revanced-builder] Updating Termux and installing dependencies... No mirror or mirror group selected. You might want to select one by running 'termux-change-repo' Checking availability of current mirror: [] https://packages-cf.termux.org/apt/termux-main/: ok Get:1 https://packages-cf.termux.dev/apt/termux-main stable InRelease [14.0 kB] Get:2 https://packages-cf.termux.dev/apt/termux-main stable/main aarch64 Packages [502 kB] Fetched 516 kB in 4s (118 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done All packages are up to date. No mirror or mirror group selected. You might want to select one by running 'termux-change-repo' Checking availability of current mirror: [] https://packages-cf.termux.org/apt/termux-main/: ok Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done nodejs-lts is already the newest version (18.16.0). openjdk-17 is already the newest version (17.0-26). 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. [revanced-builder] revanced-builder found. [revanced-builder] All checks done.
[builder] Listening at port 8000 [builder] The webserver is now running! [builder] Opening the app in the default browser... Done, check if a browser window has opened
submitted by MolWasTaken to revancedapp [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:53 BabyBushMaker Seeking Admins and Moderators for Our New Server on The Isle!

Greetings, fellow adventurers of The Isle: EVRIMA! We are thrilled to announce the launch of our brand-new Semi-Realistic server and corresponding Discord community. As we embark on this exciting journey, we are in search of dedicated admins and moderators to help us establish a thriving and welcoming environment for all players.

Are you passionate about The Isle: EVRIMA? Do you have excellent communication skills and a strong sense of fairness? If so, we invite you to join our team! As an admin/moderator, you will have the unique opportunity to shape our server, assist players, enforce rules, and organize thrilling events.

Requirements:
  1. Demonstrated knowledge and experience with The Isle.
  2. Proficient in maintaining a positive and respectful atmosphere.
  3. Excellent communication skills and a friendly demeanor.
  4. Ability to remain unbiased and handle conflicts with professionalism.
  5. Previous admin/moderator experience is plus but not mandatory.

If you believe you have what it takes to contribute to our growing community, please send us a private message with the following information on Discord to BabyBushMaker#7975 or iG_Ryner#0421:

We will carefully review all applications and select candidates who align with our server's values and requirements. Please note that only serious and dedicated individuals should apply.

Thank you for considering joining our team! Together, we can create an unforgettable gaming experience on The Isle!
submitted by BabyBushMaker to theisle [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:46 TheodorH87 Two girls, one c... I mean... two brilliancies, one blunder

Two girls, one c... I mean... two brilliancies, one blunder submitted by TheodorH87 to chessbeginners [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:43 Drjordan Amazon requesting new approval in the category I've been selling in for years?

Amazon requesting new approval in the category I've been selling in for years?
Seller since 2020.
Account in good standing/healthy.
No returns or any other issues.
This morning I tried listing an ASIN (in a brand I have approval) in topicals. 80% of my catalog falls into this category.
I received an error trying to list and received the following messages from Amazon. I'm also including a screenshot of when I originally received approval for topicals. Has anyone else experienced similar? I have no problem resubmitting a new invoice, but why is Amazon doing this? I've now gone back and forth in 10 separate messages with Amazon today, and I'm getting nowhere (shocker, I know).

Original Approval

https://preview.redd.it/jr9hh9rqn23b1.png?width=2762&format=png&auto=webp&s=d071ff5740233fe85be2b7481d2498d448f1ca86

https://preview.redd.it/o57h9u7sn23b1.png?width=2776&format=png&auto=webp&s=f659fad15bb30c7acf7bf5e7a104081406eeb9d5

https://preview.redd.it/zlehnpsun23b1.png?width=1366&format=png&auto=webp&s=284b0f6004a3961ad65f3bced07589f17ede59d5
submitted by Drjordan to AmazonSeller [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:26 Remnas21 Imperial Ireland has spread to northern france

Ignore the grey bit, my king of Ireland vassal (stupid confederate partition) has a rebellion on his hands.
submitted by Remnas21 to crusaderkings3 [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:19 MJIB0237 NHS Serious Incident Report Full of Lies

As the title says, I recently had occasion to file a complaint to my local ambulance service over the treatment I was given when 111 called them out to me back in January. The ambulance service called for a Serious Incident review.
The paramedics have lied and then lied again in this Serious incident review. They claim I was not having breathing issues at all, except on exertion when I was clearly presenting with them (I was only able to take shallow breaths and pause for air in between words when sitting on the sofa), they said they thought my pleurisy was muscle ache, they claim they had no reason to believe I was in danger of pulmonary embolism (I was taken into intensive care the next day and nearly died of multiple submassive bilateral pulmonary emboli with infarction and potential right ventricle damage). They at one point say I had been immobile since breaking my leg 5 weeks earlier, then say the pain was from using upper body strength on my walker to get about which is contradictory.
The paramedics literally told me when they came that there was nothing wrong with me, even though my symptoms were consistent with pulmonary embolism and I had a broken leg, thus increasing the risk of clots and the report did concede that a different tool for measuring the likelihood would have yielded a different result than the Wells system that they claim I scored 0 on, yet if they were being honest I’d have scored a 3.
I have an ECG readout that the trainee (one was qualified, the other was a trainee) left with me and it says on it ‘Check ECG, Repeat recording’ along with other things like ‘noise 63uv high; Reduced R in V3, V4, V5 and Q in AVL, but I don’t know what any of that means.
I’m so furious right now, there are at least 26 outright lies in one 36 page report and I don’t know what I can do now. I don’t know how they can just lie like that and I have to accept this? Is there anything else I can do at this point?
Happy to provide more information if needed in order for someone to advise.
Thank you
submitted by MJIB0237 to LegalAdviceUK [link] [comments]


2023.05.30 22:15 PurpleSolitudes Best Microphone For Streaming in USA Available On Amazon

Best Microphone For Streaming in USA Available On Amazon
A microphone is a crucial component for streaming, as it allows you to capture high-quality audio for your audience. When streaming, your voice and any other sounds you make are the primary means of communication with your viewers, and clear audio is essential for creating an engaging and enjoyable experience.
Best Microphone For Streaming can help you communicate more clearly and effectively, which can lead to higher engagement and better viewer retention. It can also help you stand out from the many other streamers who may be competing for viewers in the same space.
There are several factors to consider when selecting a microphone for streaming, including sound quality, convenience, and budget. Some popular options include USB microphones, XLR microphones with audio interfaces, and headset or lapel microphones.
Ultimately, the importance of a microphone for streaming cannot be overstated. A high-quality microphone can help you create a polished and professional stream, and it is an investment that is well worth considering if you want to take your streaming game to the next level.

Best Microphone For Streaming

Razer Seiren Mini USB Condenser Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/y418wvlfia2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fa59bbdea813d855013c9b9b05832a3e07de4cd
The Razer Seiren Mini USB Condenser Microphone is a compact and affordable microphone that delivers excellent sound quality, making it an ideal choice for content creators, streamers, or podcasters. In this review, we will take a closer look at the features, pros, and cons of this microphone. Read More View on Amazon

HyperX QuadCast - USB Condenser Gaming Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/kkmft8evia2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fc84ef537820567bfd686357f08fd18d3260cd3
HyperX QuadCast is a USB condenser gaming microphone that promises high-quality audio capture for gamers and streamers. With its sleek design and impressive specs, it has quickly become a popular choice among content creators. In this review, we'll take a closer look at the pros and cons of the HyperX QuadCast to help you decide if it's the right microphone for you.
Read More View on Amazon

Elgato Wave:3 - Premium Studio Quality USB Condenser Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/axspsid3ja2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e56c503c94156b5dd33b2862c54d6661f1c4084
Elgato Wave:3 is a high-quality USB condenser microphone that promises to deliver studio-grade sound quality for all your recording and streaming needs. Designed with the modern content creator in mind, it features a sleek design, intuitive controls, and advanced audio processing capabilities that make it an indispensable tool for anyone looking to create professional-grade content. In this review, we'll take a deep dive into its features,
Read More View on Amazon

Logitech for Creators Blue Yeti Nano Premium USB Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/x1xj8osaja2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9d2645c77030ec656286dc119454480c10d1bc9

The Logitech Blue Yeti Nano Premium USB Microphone is a compact and sleek microphone designed for creators. It provides excellent sound quality, ease of use, and versatility at an affordable price.
Read More View on Amazon

HyperX QuadCast S – RGB USB Condenser Microphone


https://preview.redd.it/do5rthvgja2b1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=1b2211c133c150eb031e93e9b843aa3b4a8f773a
HyperX QuadCast S is a top-of-the-line USB condenser microphone designed specifically for gamers and streamers who demand the best audio quality possible. With its sleek design, customizable RGB lighting, and powerful features, this microphone is
Read More View on Amazon
submitted by PurpleSolitudes to gamingshopus [link] [comments]