Accelerate indoor speedway mokena

LPI (LP Information)' newest research report, the “Fiber Access Terminal Box Industry Forecast” looks at past sales and reviews total world Fiber Access Terminal Box sales in 2022, providing a comprehensive analysis by region and market sector of projected Fiber Access Terminal Box sales for 2023 through 2029. With Fiber Access Terminal Box sales broken down by region, market sector and sub-sector, this report provides a detailed analysis in US$ millions of the world Fiber Access Terminal Box industry.
This Insight Report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global Fiber Access Terminal Box landscape and highlights key trends related to product segmentation, company formation, revenue, and market share, latest development, and M&A activity. This report also analyzes the strategies of leading global companies with a focus on Fiber Access Terminal Box portfolios and capabilities, market entry strategies, market positions, and geographic footprints, to better understand these firms' unique position in an accelerating global Fiber Access Terminal Box market.
This Insight Report evaluates the key market trends, drivers, and affecting factors shaping the global outlook for Fiber Access Terminal Box and breaks down the forecast by type, by application, geography, and market size to highlight emerging pockets of opportunity. With a transparent methodology based on hundreds of bottom-up qualitative and quantitative market inputs, this study forecast offers a highly nuanced view of the current state and future trajectory in the global Fiber Access Terminal Box .
This report presents a comprehensive overview, market shares, and growth opportunities of Fiber Access Terminal Box market by product type, application, key manufacturers and key regions and countries.
https://www.lpinformationdata.com/reports/617245/fiber-access-terminal-box-2029
The main participants
Commscope
Huawei
Hexatronic
Melontel
Fiberlink
Veekay Group
FCST
Clearfield
Spring Optical Communication
Optico Communication
Linkwell Telecom
CCL Optoelectronics
Segmentation by type
Outdoor Device
Indoor Device
Segmentation by application
Commercial
Residential
Key Questions Addressed in this Report
What is the 10-year outlook for the global Fiber Access Terminal Box market?
What factors are driving Fiber Access Terminal Box market growth, globally and by region?
Which technologies are poised for the fastest growth by market and region?
How do Fiber Access Terminal Box market opportunities vary by end market size?
How does Fiber Access Terminal Box break out type, application?
What are the influences of COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine war?
LP INFORMATION (LPI) is a professional market report publisher based in America, providing high quality market research reports with competitive prices to help decision makers make informed decisions and take strategic actions to achieve excellent outcomes.We have an extensive library of reports on hundreds of technologies.Search for a specific term, or click on an industry to browse our reports by subject. Narrow down your results using our filters or sort by what’s important to you, such as publication date, price, or name.
LP INFORMATION
E-mail: [email protected]
Add: 17890 Castleton St. Suite 369 City of Industry, CA 91748 US
Website: https://www.lpinformationdata.com

LPI (LP Information)' newest research report, the “5G Digital Repeater Industry Forecast” looks at past sales and reviews total world5G Digital Repeater sales in 2022, providing a comprehensive analysis by region and market sector of projected5G Digital Repeater sales for 2023 through 2029. With5G Digital Repeater sales broken down by region, market sector and sub-sector, this report provides a detailed analysis in US$ millions of the world5G Digital Repeater industry.
This Insight Report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global 5G Digital Repeater landscape and highlights key trends related to product segmentation, company formation, revenue, and market share, latest development, and M&A activity. This report also analyzes the strategies of leading global companies with a focus on 5G Digital Repeater portfolios and capabilities, market entry strategies, market positions, and geographic footprints, to better understand these firms' unique position in an accelerating global 5G Digital Repeater market.
This Insight Report evaluates the key market trends, drivers, and affecting factors shaping the global outlook for5G Digital Repeater and breaks down the forecast by type, by application, geography, and market size to highlight emerging pockets of opportunity. With a transparent methodology based on hundreds of bottom-up qualitative and quantitative market inputs, this study forecast offers a highly nuanced view of the current state and future trajectory in the globa l5G Digital Repeater.
This report presents a comprehensive overview, market shares, and growth opportunities of5G Digital Repeater market by product type, application, key manufacturers and key regions and countries.
https://www.lpinformationdata.com/reports/617181/5g-digital-repeater-2029
The main participants
DYNE SYSTEM Co.
Action Technologies
Prevail Technology
RF MORECOM COREA
Wilson Electronics
Remotek Corporation
Sunwave Communications Co., Ltd.
Coiler Corporation
AMPLITEC
SK Telecom
CommScope
FRTek
Hytera
Comba Telecom Systems Holdings
Segmentation by type
Active
Passive
Segmentation by application
Indoor
Outdoor
Key Questions Addressed in this Report
What is the 10-year outlook for the global 5G Digital Repeater market?
What factors are driving 5G Digital Repeater market growth, globally and by region?
Which technologies are poised for the fastest growth by market and region?
How do 5G Digital Repeater market opportunities vary by end market size?
How does 5G Digital Repeater break out type, application?
What are the influences of COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine war?
LP INFORMATION (LPI) is a professional market report publisher based in America, providing high quality market research reports with competitive prices to help decision makers make informed decisions and take strategic actions to achieve excellent outcomes.We have an extensive library of reports on hundreds of technologies.Search for a specific term, or click on an industry to browse our reports by subject. Narrow down your results using our filters or sort by what’s important to you, such as publication date, price, or name.
LP INFORMATION
E-mail: [email protected]
Add: 17890 Castleton St. Suite 369 City of Industry, CA 91748 US
Website: https://www.lpinformationdata.com

https://socialistchina.org/2022/07/15/hong-kong-the-truth-is-out/
On his first visit back to Hong Kong since 2019, long-term East Asian resident, and Friends of Socialist China Advisory Group member, Kenny Coyle writes that he found a city becalmed. “Rarely”, he observes, “has Western mainstream propaganda so successfully shrouded the truth about a city and society as open as Hong Kong.”
Kenny clarifies the meaning behind China’s insistence that Hong Kong was never a British colony, but rather a Chinese territory under illegal British occupation. His article, which also features an interview with Nixie Lam, a Legislative Council member from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), the territory’s largest and most influential patriotic political party, is full of useful information. It was originally published in the Morning Star and we are pleased to reprint it here.
Hong Kong marked the 25th anniversary of its return to Chinese sovereignty with Chinese president Xi Jinping appearing in the city to witness the inauguration of the Chinese territory’s new leadership headed by John Lee.
The largely indoor ceremony had been forecast to take place amid a mild tropical typhoon, but for the past three years Hong Kong has been battered by quite different kinds of storms.
Xi’s visit takes place after an unprecedented period of turmoil. The first stage beginning in 2019 was characterised by a wave of initially peaceful mass protests against extradition legislation, which rapidly spiralled into violent anti-China protests.
The second stage by the ongoing battle to control the Covid pandemic in the city.
In my first visit since 2019, Hong Kong certainly seems becalmed. The city’s MTR rail network is back to pristine perfection. The political arson that saw 138 of the city’s 161 stations vandalised (including the deliberate destruction of lifts for the disabled and essential safety equipment) during the 2019 protests has long been cleaned up.
Temperature and Covid checks are carried out routinely at restaurant and shopping areas, with minimal inconvenience, although the city continues to enforce a seven-day quarantine on incoming passengers from overseas.
The image in Western media of a city writhing under a police state is belied by the reality on the ground.
Bars and restaurants are busy, as any five-minute evening walk around my Tsim Sha Tsui neighbourhood in Kowloon shows, supermarket shelves are full and whatever the talking heads of the local CNN or BBC bureaus would have you believe about “threats to freedom” on screen, they still somehow manage to prop up the main bar in the Foreign Correspondents Club each evening after their shifts.
Rarely has Western mainstream propaganda so successfully shrouded the truth about a city and society as open as Hong Kong’s.
The 2019 peaceful protests degenerated into the ugliest side of the anti-China movement, with black-shirted groups attacking anything and anyone that failed to kow-tow to their agenda.
Trade union offices, political parties and even those whose only crime was speaking the standard putonghua (Mandarin) version of Chinese in public were targeted for mob attacks.
Living in the neighbouring Special Administrative Region of Macao during this time, I not only witnessed the extremist antics at first hand on visits to Hong Kong (for example during their brief blockade of the city’s immigration department) but could watch shocking broadcasts of the petrol-bombers and barricade builders live-streamed on Hong Kong TV channels.
Just as shocking was the absence of these easily available images on BBC or CNN broadcasts.
A more recent manufactured furore in the British media has been over Hong Kong textbooks being “rewritten” in relation to British rule in Hong Kong prior to China reassuming sovereignty in 1997.
The assumption, of course, is that Chinese history can only be accurately understood through a Western lens.
As if to illustrate the enormous diversity of the British press, the following headlines appeared on the issue: “China rewrites history of Hong Kong with textbooks that deny British rule” (Telegraph, June 14); “China rewrites Hong Kong textbooks to deny Britain ever ruled the city” (Independent, June 15); and slightly more accurately — “China rewrites textbooks to insist Hong Kong was never a colony” (Times, June 15); “New Hong Kong textbooks ‘will claim city never was a British colony’” (Guardian, June 15).
The average reader would be forgiven for viewing this another ridiculous example of CPC censorship, an Orwellian erasure of the well-known history of British administration in Hong Kong.
However, the proposed texts from the Hong Kong education department merely restate the longstanding positions of not only the People’s Republic of China (and that of the previous Republic of China, it should be said) but also that of the United Nations.
In 1972, one year after the PRC took China’s seat at the UN, the PRC successfully removed Hong Kong and Macao (then under Portuguese fascist administration) from the list of colonised territories.
Hong Kong was not to be considered a British colony, it was a Chinese territory under illegal British occupation, an extremely important distinction in China’s eyes.
People’s China never established a diplomatic or consular presence in British-ruled Hong Kong, believing that this would legitimise British rule.
Instead, the office of the New China News Agency (better known today as Xinhua) was the de facto centre of contacts between the British authorities and the PRC government within the territory.
The issue of Hong Kong’s pre-1997 status has become more urgent recently, after the British government and media falsely claimed that the Sino-British Declaration of 1984, signed by the Thatcher government and China, somehow gave Britain some special rights to intervene in Hong Kong affairs after 1997.
The text of the declaration clearly states the opposite: 1997 marked the return of undivided Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong.
Subsequent developments, including the much-belated extension of national security legislation in 2020 are entirely consistent with the principle of “One Country, Two Systems” first outlined by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s and are in any case covered by provisions in an annex to the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution.
But if Western eyes are on the past, China is looking forward. Plans are in place to create a Greater Bay Area, encompassing the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macao and nine major cities in Guangdong province.
The aim is to use the synergy of these southern Chinese cities to create a dynamic economic hub of around 70 million people that will eventually dwarf most national and regional economies.
Many people in Hong Kong believe the city’s future lies in closer co-operation not in conflict with the rest of China.
Nixie Lam, a member of Hong Kong’s legislative council (Legco) and a representative of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong (DAB), the largest and most influential party within the patriotic camp, holds to this perspective.
She believes the new administration led by Hong Kong chief executive John Lee has the opportunity to put the territory back on the right track.
Lee, who takes office on July 1, has already outlined a platform that the future government will set clear targets and key performance indicators (KPIs) for selected tasks within the first 100 days of his new administration.
Some of this is designed to streamline government functioning, but he has also pledged to accelerate land and housing development, shorten the waiting time for public housing and address the city’s vast wealth gap.
“Hong Kong has wasted a lot of time and opportunities over the past few years. I see very high expectations among Hong Kong citizens. We have missed out on a lot. Where are we going to develop and to excel is the key, but time is very limited,” stresses Lam, a former grassroots district councillor.
“Perhaps that’s why Lee came up with his 100 days KPI promise, to show he would make visible changes in different aspects of policies and strategies.
“The new administration is formed by various well seasoned politicians, administrators, together with some industry leaders. It shows the new administration wants to restart Hong Kong and work together as a team.
“I’ve joined working groups scrutinising the new government structure. If you look closely, it’s easy to see that they really want to tackle some of the unresolved issues we face by bringing outside experts into the administration.”
Lam, herself a graduate of the University of Queensland in Australia, is nonetheless tired of Western countries continually lecturing Hong Kong.
“It’s boring to hear that democracy or One Country, Two Systems is dead. For those who live in Hong Kong, we know clearly who killed our democracy in 2019.
“Rioters and mobs were everywhere destroying public facilities, paralysing railway systems and so on but they were called ‘Freedom Fighters’ by Western countries. These double standards are not new in Hong Kong,” she insists.
“Hong Kong citizens know what’s best for our city. It is not begging overseas countries to sanction our city, it is not calling for American troops to take over our city, and it is definitely not the violent ‘democracy’ that they embraced.
“The city has been stablised. Ordinary citizens do not need to worry about being targeted by extremists any more. Discussions are no longer highly polarised but focus more on which strategy is best for the city.
“I guess that some people in Western countries do not want to see that our life is getting back to normal. People in Hong Kong are more focused on our Covid strategy and want to find more targeted solutions, finding a way that will balance reopening the city with ensuring people’s lives and health are protected,” she says.
Despite the challenges, Lam is clear about the way forward: “It is for us, Hong Kong citizens to work jointly toward rebuilding our city.”

https://socialistchina.org/2022/07/15/hong-kong-the-truth-is-out/
On his first visit back to Hong Kong since 2019, long-term East Asian resident, and Friends of Socialist China Advisory Group member, Kenny Coyle writes that he found a city becalmed. “Rarely”, he observes, “has Western mainstream propaganda so successfully shrouded the truth about a city and society as open as Hong Kong.”
Kenny clarifies the meaning behind China’s insistence that Hong Kong was never a British colony, but rather a Chinese territory under illegal British occupation. His article, which also features an interview with Nixie Lam, a Legislative Council member from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), the territory’s largest and most influential patriotic political party, is full of useful information. It was originally published in the Morning Star and we are pleased to reprint it here.
Hong Kong marked the 25th anniversary of its return to Chinese sovereignty with Chinese president Xi Jinping appearing in the city to witness the inauguration of the Chinese territory’s new leadership headed by John Lee.
The largely indoor ceremony had been forecast to take place amid a mild tropical typhoon, but for the past three years Hong Kong has been battered by quite different kinds of storms.
Xi’s visit takes place after an unprecedented period of turmoil. The first stage beginning in 2019 was characterised by a wave of initially peaceful mass protests against extradition legislation, which rapidly spiralled into violent anti-China protests.
The second stage by the ongoing battle to control the Covid pandemic in the city.
In my first visit since 2019, Hong Kong certainly seems becalmed. The city’s MTR rail network is back to pristine perfection. The political arson that saw 138 of the city’s 161 stations vandalised (including the deliberate destruction of lifts for the disabled and essential safety equipment) during the 2019 protests has long been cleaned up.
Temperature and Covid checks are carried out routinely at restaurant and shopping areas, with minimal inconvenience, although the city continues to enforce a seven-day quarantine on incoming passengers from overseas.
The image in Western media of a city writhing under a police state is belied by the reality on the ground.
Bars and restaurants are busy, as any five-minute evening walk around my Tsim Sha Tsui neighbourhood in Kowloon shows, supermarket shelves are full and whatever the talking heads of the local CNN or BBC bureaus would have you believe about “threats to freedom” on screen, they still somehow manage to prop up the main bar in the Foreign Correspondents Club each evening after their shifts.
Rarely has Western mainstream propaganda so successfully shrouded the truth about a city and society as open as Hong Kong’s.
The 2019 peaceful protests degenerated into the ugliest side of the anti-China movement, with black-shirted groups attacking anything and anyone that failed to kow-tow to their agenda.
Trade union offices, political parties and even those whose only crime was speaking the standard putonghua (Mandarin) version of Chinese in public were targeted for mob attacks.
Living in the neighbouring Special Administrative Region of Macao during this time, I not only witnessed the extremist antics at first hand on visits to Hong Kong (for example during their brief blockade of the city’s immigration department) but could watch shocking broadcasts of the petrol-bombers and barricade builders live-streamed on Hong Kong TV channels.
Just as shocking was the absence of these easily available images on BBC or CNN broadcasts.
A more recent manufactured furore in the British media has been over Hong Kong textbooks being “rewritten” in relation to British rule in Hong Kong prior to China reassuming sovereignty in 1997.
The assumption, of course, is that Chinese history can only be accurately understood through a Western lens.
As if to illustrate the enormous diversity of the British press, the following headlines appeared on the issue: “China rewrites history of Hong Kong with textbooks that deny British rule” (Telegraph, June 14); “China rewrites Hong Kong textbooks to deny Britain ever ruled the city” (Independent, June 15); and slightly more accurately — “China rewrites textbooks to insist Hong Kong was never a colony” (Times, June 15); “New Hong Kong textbooks ‘will claim city never was a British colony’” (Guardian, June 15).
The average reader would be forgiven for viewing this another ridiculous example of CPC censorship, an Orwellian erasure of the well-known history of British administration in Hong Kong.
However, the proposed texts from the Hong Kong education department merely restate the longstanding positions of not only the People’s Republic of China (and that of the previous Republic of China, it should be said) but also that of the United Nations.
In 1972, one year after the PRC took China’s seat at the UN, the PRC successfully removed Hong Kong and Macao (then under Portuguese fascist administration) from the list of colonised territories.
Hong Kong was not to be considered a British colony, it was a Chinese territory under illegal British occupation, an extremely important distinction in China’s eyes.
People’s China never established a diplomatic or consular presence in British-ruled Hong Kong, believing that this would legitimise British rule.
Instead, the office of the New China News Agency (better known today as Xinhua) was the de facto centre of contacts between the British authorities and the PRC government within the territory.
The issue of Hong Kong’s pre-1997 status has become more urgent recently, after the British government and media falsely claimed that the Sino-British Declaration of 1984, signed by the Thatcher government and China, somehow gave Britain some special rights to intervene in Hong Kong affairs after 1997.
The text of the declaration clearly states the opposite: 1997 marked the return of undivided Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong.
Subsequent developments, including the much-belated extension of national security legislation in 2020 are entirely consistent with the principle of “One Country, Two Systems” first outlined by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s and are in any case covered by provisions in an annex to the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution.
But if Western eyes are on the past, China is looking forward. Plans are in place to create a Greater Bay Area, encompassing the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macao and nine major cities in Guangdong province.
The aim is to use the synergy of these southern Chinese cities to create a dynamic economic hub of around 70 million people that will eventually dwarf most national and regional economies.
Many people in Hong Kong believe the city’s future lies in closer co-operation not in conflict with the rest of China.
Nixie Lam, a member of Hong Kong’s legislative council (Legco) and a representative of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong (DAB), the largest and most influential party within the patriotic camp, holds to this perspective.
She believes the new administration led by Hong Kong chief executive John Lee has the opportunity to put the territory back on the right track.
Lee, who takes office on July 1, has already outlined a platform that the future government will set clear targets and key performance indicators (KPIs) for selected tasks within the first 100 days of his new administration.
Some of this is designed to streamline government functioning, but he has also pledged to accelerate land and housing development, shorten the waiting time for public housing and address the city’s vast wealth gap.
“Hong Kong has wasted a lot of time and opportunities over the past few years. I see very high expectations among Hong Kong citizens. We have missed out on a lot. Where are we going to develop and to excel is the key, but time is very limited,” stresses Lam, a former grassroots district councillor.
“Perhaps that’s why Lee came up with his 100 days KPI promise, to show he would make visible changes in different aspects of policies and strategies.
“The new administration is formed by various well seasoned politicians, administrators, together with some industry leaders. It shows the new administration wants to restart Hong Kong and work together as a team.
“I’ve joined working groups scrutinising the new government structure. If you look closely, it’s easy to see that they really want to tackle some of the unresolved issues we face by bringing outside experts into the administration.”
Lam, herself a graduate of the University of Queensland in Australia, is nonetheless tired of Western countries continually lecturing Hong Kong.
“It’s boring to hear that democracy or One Country, Two Systems is dead. For those who live in Hong Kong, we know clearly who killed our democracy in 2019.
“Rioters and mobs were everywhere destroying public facilities, paralysing railway systems and so on but they were called ‘Freedom Fighters’ by Western countries. These double standards are not new in Hong Kong,” she insists.
“Hong Kong citizens know what’s best for our city. It is not begging overseas countries to sanction our city, it is not calling for American troops to take over our city, and it is definitely not the violent ‘democracy’ that they embraced.
“The city has been stablised. Ordinary citizens do not need to worry about being targeted by extremists any more. Discussions are no longer highly polarised but focus more on which strategy is best for the city.
“I guess that some people in Western countries do not want to see that our life is getting back to normal. People in Hong Kong are more focused on our Covid strategy and want to find more targeted solutions, finding a way that will balance reopening the city with ensuring people’s lives and health are protected,” she says.
Despite the challenges, Lam is clear about the way forward: “It is for us, Hong Kong citizens to work jointly toward rebuilding our city.”

While the rhetoric has been quite adamant for years that 1.5C "future warming" will be "safe", how can that possibly be accurate when according to the very "experts" making that claim, we are only at something like 1.2C today, yet shit is already fucked? More importantly, why are we still hearing it and why has there been no critical analysis of the most harmful piece of misinformation we have heard on the climate, that there has been a safe amount of anything (warming, emissions, other pollutants, species loss, environmental degradation, etc.) remaining these last few decades? Oh, there has been plenty written about the viability of that meaningless target, but little about what a terrible guess it was for safe or the groupthink of the so-called experts who have systematically downplayed both the severity and imminence of our present-day, full-blown, climate crisis and in doing so, prevented any meaningful climate action from occurring.
I fundamentally disagree with the idea that there is such a thing as an expert at predicting the future. That desire has been present throughout human history and while their precious models can get some things right, some of the time, so could the Oracle of Delphi. Central to the concept of science is experimentation, the testing of hypotheses, and that cannot be done for a prediction about the future--all you can do is wait and see if it comes true. Lacking the ability to test their predictions climate modellers, like many in academia, turn to the statistical practice of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) in order to be able to perform a simulacrum of the scientific method. While criticisms have dogged NHST since its inception and in recent years many have come to blame it as the cause of their field's "replication crisis", the practice persists despite growing calls to end it because it is the only link fields like economics, psychology, and all forms of computer modelling have to their claim that they are a science and the stronger authority that designation carries. The worst part is that NHST is typically taught so poorly to non-statisticians that it is often not done correctly. In his 2010 study Maarten Ambaum found:

We tested a recent, randomly selected issue of the Journal of Climate for at least one instance in each article of misusing a significance test to quantify the validity of some physical hypothesis. The Journal of Climate was not selected because it is prone to include such errors, but because it can safely be considered one of the top journals in climate science. In that particular issue, we observed misuse of significance tests in about three-quarters of the articles; a randomly selected issue published 10 years prior showed such misuses of significance tests in about half of the articles.

Which is common wherever NHST is (ab)used. In his 2021 paper, Theodore Shepherd drew upon a psychologist's observation that that field treats NHST as a 'statistical ritual' to ask if it is any different in the climate "sciences", writing:

Nicholls (2000) and Ambaum (2010) both provide detailed assessments showing widespread use of NHST in climate publications. This practice does not appear to have declined since the publication of those papers; indeed, my impression is that it has only increased, exacerbated by the growing dominance of the so-called 'high-impact' journals which enforce the statistical rituals with particular vigour, supposedly in an effort to achieve a high level of scientific rigour.
...
I would add that Gigerenzer's insightful comment about "identification with social groups" may also apply to climate scientists, in that statistical rituals become a working paradigm for certain journals and reviewers. I suspect that I am not alone in admitting that most of the statistical tests in my own papers are performed in order to satisfy these rituals, rather than as part of the scientific discovery process itself.
...
Gigerenzer shows that NHST as described above, is a bastardized hybrid of Fisher's null hypothesis testing and Neyman-Pearson decision theory and has no basis even in orthodox frequentist statistics. According to Fisher, a null hypothesis test should only be performed in the absence of any prior knowledge, and before one has even looked at the data, neither of which applies to the typical applications in climate science.

The more things change the more they stay the same and today's pseudoscientific predictive computer modelling is merely the latest in a long line of attempts to do the impossible. Guessing at the future is not a science regardless of the confirmatory rituals performed! That the journals enforce the ritual so vigorously while in at least one randomly chosen instance a large majority of the articles didn't even do it properly, would be absurd if it weren't so expected.
Ultimately, the debate over what is and isn't a science is, like the field of climatology itself, purely academic. So long as the entirely fraudulent field of "climate-economics" is allowed to exist, let alone continue to dominate the top, policy "informing", level of the discussion, nothing the climatologists do matters, although it's arguable the modelling never mattered since even perfectly accurate models would confer no actual ability to affect the course of the climate crisis we have inflicted on this planet and it was never necessary to guess at the future to know what we need to be doing today.
Founded by the charlatan William Nordhaus, "climate-economics" is bad, even by the wretched standards of the intellectually, academically, ethically, and morally bankrupt religion of economics. In researching his work, Steve Keen concluded that it, "can be characterized as 'making up numbers to support a pre-existing belief': specifically, that climate change could have only a trivial impact upon the economy." In my opinion, the only thing that needs to happen at any future COPout is for all attendees to be forced to sit down and read Keen's paper, The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change, since they seem to be unfamiliar with it even though it is one of the most important ever written on the climate. It's neither very long nor technical because it doesn't need to be, which is something Keen mentions: He thought he was going to be writing a dry paper about discount rates and the suitability of modelling techniques, instead he discovered that Nordhaus' work is so appallingly bad that it doesn't pass any sort of smell test and yet it has served as the basis for the field that has "informed" everything we have done, or more accurately not done, on the climate.
The fact that the most pointed criticisms of the farce that is "climate-economics" came from one of the very few economists out there with a clue, rather than a climatologist, is alarming because Nordhaus' "research" is founded on assumptions like 87% of the economy will be unaffected because it occurs indoors (something that made it into the IPCC's AR5!) and that the weak, but "statistically significant", correlation between average temperature and gross state product across the USA today can be used to predict the impact of global warming on the economy of the future. Did not a single climatologist look into his work before accepting it as valid? Hell, with him declaring that 4C warming is what would be optimal for the con-on-you-and-me in his acceptance lecture for the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in the Economic Arts, you don't even need to dig into his "research" to know that he is clueless of both topics.
Which is a major problem because Nordhaus is the originator of today's belief in one-point-five thanks to his "first intuition" in the '70s that 2C warming would be "safe"... for the economy. That remained the target for years, even being codified in 2010, and was only dialed back in Paris when a group of Exploited Nations that the predictions for sea-level rise said would be largely underwater at 2C warming objected and refused to sign anything that would see them cease to exist, even if we were successful. One-point-five basically didn't exist in the literature before it was added to the political system in Paris (for example it is not even mentioned in the previously linked 2014 article on climate change's "speed limit" of 2C) because no honest climatologist viewed it as even possible and while the studies performed subsequently would confirm that 1.5 is indeed a lower number than 2, both are terrible, unfounded, guesses at safe. That's it though, the opinions of a charlatan and the belief that global warming = sea-level rise... our "expert" risk assessment has all the depth and breadth as the one provided by that banker who went viral last year. No wonder they have failed so miserably to bend the Keeling curve.
One-point-five isn't even the first estimation of what would be safe. That was an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 350 ppm which was an increase of 70 over the pre-industrial figure of 280. With hindsight, that was a much better guess at safe but we passed that threshold for the final time over three decades ago. That we frequently hear the "experts" babbling that there is a "carbon budget" remaining to us today, in the era of Faster Than Expected and the yearly "thousand-year" storm, is unforgivable. That wasn't true thirty years ago, let alone when they invented the term after we had nearly succeeded in doubling-down on the emissions. They may be able to rationalize away their goalpost moving by saying "The Science" has changed since then, that just means that "The Science" and reality are going in opposite directions as the climate crisis is already worse today than any "serious" prediction for 2100.
There is an interesting quote in the Keen paper from a scientist responding to a Nordhaus survey question back in 1994, before the economists succeeded in hijacking the climate conversation and when Nordhaus was still including actual scientists in his surveys, rather than just other e-conmen as he did later on:

I must tell you that I marvel that economists are willing to make quantitative estimates of economic consequences of climate change where the only measures available are estimates of global surface average increases in temperature. As [one] who has spent his career worrying about the vagaries of the dynamics of the atmosphere, I marvel that they can translate a single global number, an extremely poor surrogate for a description of the climatic conditions, into quantitative impacts of global economic conditions.

Despite being considered the most important metric in modern, economics dominated, climate "science", average surface temperature is, in fact, "an extremely poor surrogate for a description of the climatic conditions," as confirmed by the best piece of actual climate science we have seen in ages, Song et al. (2022). The authors of that study examined the trends in surface equivalent potential temperature (Thetae_sfc) which is a more comprehensive metric than just temperature alone because it also incorporates humidity. Their most interesting finding is that rather than the Arctic warming x-times faster than the rest of the planet as is commonly claimed (what's it up to now? 4x?), "In other words, the Earth is heated more uniformly when measured by Thetae_sfc." That we could expect higher humidity which in turn would cause more extreme weather is, "one of the most robust findings of most if not all climate model studies," and something the models actually got right, yet it is only at this late stage that someone finally got around to examining this and despite the paper being published in the prestigious journal PNAS & receiving decent media coverage at the time, it appears to have had no impact and already been forgotten as it does not conform to the field's groupthink. Rather it calls into question what it is they've wasted their time on these past few decades since they aren't even using the best available metric.
While the history of science is one of remarkable intellects making amazing discoveries, it is also a history of egomaniacs, charlatans, and pigheadedness which is why physicist Max Planck famously quipped "science advances one funeral at a time." The bad actors only get weeded out with time and through free and open debate. Unfortunately, when it comes to the climate not only are we out of time, but the debate has been anything but free, open, or, frankly, reality-based. Censorship permeates everything they do, from our "gold standard" in climate "science", the IPCC, which for years has censored all of the alarming parts from it's own reports, down to the individual level where, outside of a few notable exceptions, the ones that have not repeated the lies often enough to believe in them self-censor to avoid the dreaded "alarmist" label.
There were 50,000 people in Paris and despite numerous reports of discontent, there was only one, Kevin Anderson, with the courage to speak out publicly against that failure. It will forever be to their shame that that death sentence for most complex life on this planet did not cause a schism in the field, so it is always worth listening to one of the few who has been honest with us, especially when he says things like:

I've only really become aware of the misleading and dangerous influence of some senior academics on their earlier career colleagues over the past two years. It was brought to my attention at one of the big climate negotiations (COPs) I was attending. Chatting to those without grey hair, it became increasingly clear many of them were being reprimanded for asking difficult questions by their senior colleagues and supervisors. I really found this hard to believe. But the more I asked about this the more I realized I'd been living in a naive bubble unaware of how vibrant academic debate driven by younger academic candidates is being deliberately stifled.

In a sane world, that interview would have spawned at least one government inquiry but when the field possesses, "a deep institutional systemic bias towards aligning [their] conclusions within the boundaries of the status quo," why would it? They are already telling our governments what they want to hear and any real investigation would just reveal that the emperor has no clothes. Besides, that, "[they’ve] chosen to forgo [their] academic independence for the appeal of being relevant within a debate [their] own analysis tells [them] is irrelevant," falls squarely on the so-called scientists.
Anderson also talks at length about something us outsiders have heard quite a bit, especially in recent years: That many of his colleagues are as alarmed as he is but the culture of censorship, intimidation, and ridicule has them too afraid to speak out, concluding that, "Typically it is more senior academics and others who hold these conflicting public and private positions." For another example of this, Bill McGuire said in an interview last year:

I know a lot of people working in climate science who say one thing in public but a very different thing in private. In confidence, they are all much more scared about the future we face, but they won't admit that in public. I call this climate appeasement and I believe it only makes things worse. The world needs to know how bad things are going to get before we can hope to start [!!!] to tackle the crisis.

I call it cowardice and wish the honest ones would start naming names. For one more example, it also made an appearance in this rare display of contrition from three climate scientists apologizing for their roles in promulgating the "net carbon zero" myth:

In private, scientists express significant scepticism about the Paris Agreement, BECCS, offsetting, geoengineering and net zero. Apart from some notable exceptions, in public we quietly go about our work, apply for funding, publish papers and teach. The path to disastrous climate change is paved with feasibility studies and impact assessments.
Rather than acknowledge the seriousness of our situation, we instead continue to participate in the fantasy of net zero. What will we do when reality bites? What will we say to our friends and loved ones about our failure to speak out now?

That article also has this passage about the central role "climate-economics" has played:

It was around that time [1997] that the first computer models linking greenhouse gas emissions to impacts on different sectors of the economy were developed. These hybrid climate-economic models are known as Integrated Assessment Models. They allowed modellers to link economic activity to the climate by, for example, exploring how changes in investments and technology could lead to changes in greenhouse gas emissions.
They seemed like a miracle: you could try out policies on a computer screen before implementing them, saving humanity costly experimentation [WHAT DID THEY SAVE US?!?]. They rapidly emerged to become key guidance for climate policy. A primacy they maintain to this day.
Unfortunately, they also removed the need for deep critical thinking. Such models represent society as a web of idealised, emotionless buyers and sellers and thus ignore complex social and political realities, or even the impacts of climate change itself. Their implicit promise is that market-based approaches will always work. This meant that discussions about policies were limited to those most convenient to politicians: incremental changes to legislation and taxes.

Which is why, on the balance, I think it is a good article even if it contains blatant misinformation like: "Relying on untested carbon dioxide removal mechanisms to achieve the Paris targets when we have the technologies to transition away from fossil fuels today..." That is what Kevin Anderson was referring to when he said, "Worse still, [his colleagues] frequently point to idealised technical solutions, yet often with little understanding of either the technologies or their practical deliveries..." because there simply is no replacement for the fossil fuels and the belief that Green BAU is desirable, let alone even possible, is another of the harmful lies we have been fed by our so-called experts for the sole purpose of delaying real action.
That article also brings me back to a question I have wondered occasionally over the years: What even goes into the typical 'climatology' education? Do they have to spend so much time bringing students up to speed on the esoteric technobabble of climate modelling that they never get around to teaching them any real science? Because I would think you need a strong grounding in the three physical sciences yet they so often evince views that run afoul of them, most notably in their embracing of the "net carbon zero" myth. While it's great that the authors of the article have come to the realization that it is a 'dangerous trap', what took them so long? I have never been more demoralized in my life than the first time I came across the words "net carbon zero" as that is dependent on either impossible technology being invented or an impossible energy source being discovered that can power the existing technology. Otherwise, we do not have access to enough energy to make even a measurable difference in atmospheric CO2 content. While, like in virtually every other aspect, the conversation around carbon capture may be focused solely on the dollar amount per ton, removing CO2 from the atmosphere is an energetic process, not a financial one and while money, as a figment of the human imagination, is effectively infinite, energy is, and always will be, the constraining resource on all of humanity's ambitions. Unless the emissions are essentially zero, "net carbon zero" will never happen which is why present 'direct air capture' efforts don't even remove 10 seconds worth of our annual emissions (0.01MT in 2022 so 0.01E6/36.8E9*365.25*24*60*60=8.57s). That's not a "good first step", that's fucking hubris.
This flagrant disregard for the physical sciences can be seen quite clearly in the newest bullshit we are hearing from the people who have been wrong all along. I find it incredible that in an article titled "The Best Climate Science You've Never Heard Of" posted to his own website, climate crisis denier Michael E. Mann doesn't even make an attempt at explaining this "science". Just an appeal to the authority of "the experts" to claim there is no longer going to be a "warming lag" and a bunch of "blah blah blah". I call it incredible because the Washington Post, apparently having higher standards, did require such an explanation, wanting though it may be, in the version they published meaning, left to his own devices our chief celebrity climate "scientist" and the media's 'go-to guy' when they need to downplay doesn't feel he has to explain himself, at all. I always try to give credit where credit is due though and that article isn't a total loss as it does contain a claim that this "science", "... underlies the widely-now used concept of a 'carbon budget'," which is good to know.
It doesn't even require a scientific background to question this "science" when the explanations don't go any deeper than what was in the WaPo:

Yes, CO2 pushes temperatures higher, but carbon 'sinks', including forests and in particular the oceans, absorb almost half of the CO2 that is emitted, causing atmospheric CO2 levels to drop, offsetting the delayed warming effect.

Because anybody who has been paying attention should question how much of a role forests are going to play in sequestering carbon in the future when all of the largest ones have been net emitters for years. While human deforestation efforts are undoubtedly a major contributor to that, where is the evidence that is going to slow down, let alone stop? Not only will few accept going 'cold and hungry' while there is still material around to burn, wood chips are a necessary ingredient in the smelting of metallurgical silicon, so the Bright Green Dream requires not only on a massive expansion of mining, but deforestation as well.
But it is the idea that "in particular the oceans" will continue to be a significant carbon sink that is truly troubling because that is not what the physical chemistry says. While the oceans do take in a good portion of our emissions that's all they do, take in a portion of our emissions. The amount of CO2 that remains dissolved in the surface ocean is directly proportional to its partial pressure in the atmosphere in accordance with Henry's Law.
While the oceans are undeniably complex & not well understood even today, and the real-world doesn't play out exactly as the ideal gas laws would indicate, there is no reason to believe the oceans would continue to take in a significant amount of CO2 in a "net carbon zero" scenario, let alone one where the atmospheric concentration is decreasing. In the unlikely event that aliens show up to save us from ourselves using technology that is indistinguishable from magic, the oceans should be expected to emit CO2. The thermohaline circulation sees carbon-rich surface water replaced with deep water that is comparatively unsaturated, but that process takes hundreds-to-thousands of years to complete while the air-sea gas exchange is believed to equilibrate in under one. It also appears to be so trivial an effect that I have never even been able to find an estimation of how much CO2 is believed to be "sequestered" in this fashion. It certainly doesn't appear anywhere in this "science" and, unfortunately, nowadays the search results are flooded with hare-brained schemes to dump shit into the oceans to try to utilize the effect because, as it occurs naturally, it is inconsequential. It's worth noting that with satire being dead and all, Mann's own research indicates the thermohaline circulation is slowing down as the oceans warm, further weakening that sink.
Additionally, Henry's Law is temperature dependent and warmer liquids are less capable of holding dissolved gases which is why the full old "warming lag" theory went:

As both land and oceans start to warm up, they both release large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, from melting permafrost and from warming ocean water, since CO2 solubility in water is greater in cold conditions. That release enhances the greenhouse effect, amplifying the warming trend and leading to yet more CO2 being degassed. In other words, increasing CO2 levels become both the cause and effect of further warming. Once started, it's a vicious, self-reinforcing cycle - an excellent example of what science refers to as a positive climate feedback.

Meaning this "science" directly contradicts the old theory with no explanation given for why that should be the case. Now, obviously it is a bad idea to base your scientific understanding off of an MSM article, but even going up one level, the most frequently referenced pop-sci article on the topic is this "explainer" from climate crisis denier Zeke Hausfather at Carbon Brief. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly coming from the climate user who brought us such nonsense as, 'ackshually, the models have been quite accurate,' and, 'ackshually, the models are running too hot,' it doesn't provide any better explanation, which is too bad because the comment section offered a great opportunity to clear up many of the valid concerns people have about this "science" but, even with a comment directly calling out the lack of response, no answers were provided.
Going up to the final level, the paper that seems to be referenced the most is MacDougall et al (2020), which, despite being the source for Hausfather's claim that, "By chance, these two factors cancel each other out," is a meta study that found "Models exhibit a wide variety of behaviours after emissions cease..." I am not sure how it is they determined given, "a wide variety of behaviours," that the "zero emission commitment" would therefore be zero--I guess it could be buried somewhere in the technobabble--but I feel there is enough plain English to make a determination about the validity of this "science":

In CANESM5 and CNRM the terrestrial carbon sink dominates the reduction in radiative forcing, while in ACCESS, IAPRAS, MESM, P. GENIE, and UVic, the ocean carbon uptake dominates the reduction in radiative forcing.
...
Given that the behaviour of the terrestrial carbon cycle varies strongly between models and that many models lack feedbacks related to nutrient limitation and permafrost carbon pools, the strong dependence of ZEC50 on terrestrial carbon uptake is concerning for the robustness of ZEC50 estimates. Notably the three ESMs with the weakest terrestrial carbon sink response include terrestrial nutrient limitation.
...
The analysis here has shown that across models decadal-scale ZEC is poorly correlated to other metrics of climate warming, such as TCR and ECS, though relationships may exist in model frameworks. However, the three factors that drive ZEC, ocean heat uptake, ocean carbon uptake, and net land carbon flux correlate relatively well to their states before emissions cease.

With the final passage seeming to confirm that this "science" does indeed violate the physical chemistry of the situation and that this will happen is nothing more than an assumption necessary for this, particularly GIGO brand of, modelling to work. It really feels like it is not a matter of, "by chance," but rather, "by design". Why even consider the models that lack basic elements like 'terrestrial nutrient limitations'?
Finally, this "science" just fails conceptually being entirely predicated on humanity reaching a more extreme version of the physically impossible state of "net carbon zero" than exists in any of our "plans" which already account for the natural carbon sinks. It also requires the aerosol masking effect and the positive feedbacks to not exist as well as for the ongoing Mass Extinction to reverse course even though our Bright Green Dreams call for an intensification of our all-out assault on the rest of our biosphere. The simple fact is that almost all of the CO2 we are unleashing today was originally fixed by living things over the course of millions of years. To believe it will happen faster this time around, especially given present conditions, is just delusional.
It's not surprising that we would see something like this though. While it was one thing to discuss the idea that we have to stop burning fossil fuels long before things 'get bad' when that was only a problem for the distant future to worry about, it's an entirely different thing today when shit is absolutely fucked and our "leaders" are still desperately trying to ramp up the rate of extraction. That's alarmism and violates the field's dictum of "we mustn't be alarmist". As long as that dictum remains in effect though, climate modelling will continue to be incredibly biased against our alarming reality. Any model that accurately predicted our present conditions a decade ago would have been dismissed for being "too alarmist" and had the creator persisted, their career would have been destroyed. It's quite bothersome to hear it said that "the experts" warned us this was coming because while anyone talking 2020 was called many names, they were all antonyms of "expert". The so-called experts, on the other hand, were blathering about 2050 this and 2100 that.
They were also warning almost exclusively about sea-level rise which is why David Wallace-Wells felt it necessary to open his infamous 2017 The Uninhabitable Earth article with the line "If your anxiety about global warming is dominated by fears of sea-level rise, you are barely scratching the surface of what terrors are possible..." I thought, with "the science saying" that we could expect higher humidity which would cause more extreme weather, that Hurricane Katrina was a good time to begin transitioning the conversation about the climate away from just global warming = sea-level rise because while that is an existential threat for many, it is not for humanity as a whole the way the extremes and catastrophes are and focusing on it has always been a way to downplay and trivialize: "So what? We will just build sea walls." The so-called experts not only disagreed with that assessment, they denounced it and not just for Katrina. For many years in every single article after every single one of the increasingly frequent climate catastrophes there was an "expert" disavowing any connection between our noticeably changed climate and the noticeable increase in extreme weather, much like the 1.5C hopium that accompanies virtually all mainstream writing on the climate today. Song et al. (2022) cite a 2017 statement from the American Meteorological Society that read "We're experiencing new weather, because we've made a new climate" as one of the earliest examples of the attribution finally being made.
While the climate has changed quite dramatically since we crossed the original safe threshold over thirty years ago, almost all of that has occurred in the last five as we went from a position of official denialism to, and I apologize for getting technical again, shit being absolutely fucked and even though the "science" that "informed" the Paris Agreement predicted none of this, we aren't seeing a frantic re-evaluation of our "plans". No their minimum timeline is still nearly double the length over which we have seen such a frightening intensification and we are still being subjected to the same old delusions, denialism, and dishonest downplaying.
It was seeing them all repeat the nonsense that it was 'necessary' to downplay in order to 'get anything done' that was the first major turn-off for me. Not just because it was always predicated on an appeal to the authority of "the psychologists"; not even because it was always going to fail to "spur us into action" allowing instead for the spread of the monstrous sentiment "Why should I care? It won't get bad until after I am dead"; but because dishonesty is inherent to it and there is no worse way to get people on board with something than by lying to them about it. I can't be the only one who bristles at being told that I must simply accept the clearly wrong opinions of admitted liars, can I? That they keep mindlessly repeating it to this day, when we have decades of real-world evidence that downplaying doesn't do anything but breed complacency, is just another example of how difficult it is for reality to intrude upon their groupthink.
Three decades of talks have yet to produce a single tangible result. If anything, the conversation is even further removed from reality today as the "net carbon zero" myth did not exist back then. With COPout-Fest 2022 having been sponsored by Coca-Cola, it's like they go out of their way to discredit themselves. How, exactly, does a "climate" conference end up partnering with one of the worst polluters on the planet? It is beyond indefensible for the scientific community to still be supporting and legitimizing the charade, especially since we have been hearing for years that actual scientists are just sidelined and ignored. Can it really be called a "climate conference" if it is just a bunch of politicos and economists circle-jerking about economic growth? It's a damn shame they learned no lessons from their most productive year yet, 2020, because their Carbon Indulgences do not, in fact, undo any of the very real harm inflicted on our biosphere as a result of those wastes of time, energy, and resources.
I don't think we would be any worse off had the IPCC not been formed and had they not began COPping-out. I just can't see how we would have acted any differently when the last 30 years have been spent the same the as the prior 240: Burning through the fossil fuels as quickly and recklessly as we possibly can, all while boasting about how incredibly clever we are for doing so. That the physical limits of our planet are preventing us from continuing today is to the majority, and a very large one at that, the greatest injustice of all. As long as maintaining present living standards and the biosphere-wrecking industrial system necessary to provide them remains the sole goal of our "climate" (really economic) action plans, we will continue acting single-mindedly towards making a bad situation even worse. The only thing the IPCC and COPout crowds have to show for three decades of "efforts" is increasingly unhinged rationalizations to justify further emissions and ecocide. We aren't even at the stage where we are able to discuss the banning of absolute frivolities like cruise ships!
While the Mystics of the Markets may declare that there are no Limits to Growth, that belief comes from a position of ignorance and nothing more. That none other than William fucking Nordhaus was involved in the deboonking of that famously accurate study is why I view him as the greatest villain in all of human history because nobody else will even come close to his body count. The reality is we slammed into those limits years ago and it's tragic really: If there is indeed still time left for us to avert our own extinction, then with the global industrial economy in its death throes and clearly not working out for the vast majority anymore, there is a great opportunity for the 'paradigm shift' to the ecological understanding of the world put forth as a necessary first step by William R. Catton Jr. in his remarkably prescient 1980 book Overshoot: The Ecological Basis for Revolutionary Change. But, with modern "environmental" activism having been fully co-opted by industrial interests, we seem even further from that understanding today. Seriously, when was the last time you heard about the need to be teaching the children "ecological literacy"? Ever? Now compare that to all the prattle about "financial literacy". Only one of those concepts has a physical basis in reality and it's not the one the current zeitgeist is focused on.
I guess this is the part where I am supposed to provide a hit of hopium that all is not lost, instead here is a thought experiment to help contextualize where we are in terms of "climate action":

Imagine a world in which we were deserving of the name we gave our species and the wise apes outnumbered the silly ones 100,000,000-to-1 rather than the opposite. Realizing that their desired way of living was having disastrous consequences on their only habitat, the wise apes took the necessary and appropriate steps to reach their, non-silly, version of "net carbon zero by 2050" and in their first year of fully post-industrial living they experienced the same climate catastrophes we are suffering today. Would they consider themselves successful?

As long as the ecocidal nightmare that is the Bright Green Dream is the extent of our "plans", then we aren't even at the 'realizing' stage. The vehicle speeding towards the climate cliff is already airborne and our so-called experts have convinced themselves that can be fixed by painting the accelerator green. We are in desperate need of new leadership and it is well past time to stop listening to the people who have participated in the downplaying and myth-making, but with the disgusting way everyone else was treated, they would be entirely justified giving us the ol' Ray Patterson. Drastic change needs to be a thing of the past before we start talking about hope for the future.

In response to this post:

• https://www.reddit.com/getdisciplined/comments/11wbs66/meta_method_why_does_everything_always_come_down/

Response:

There must be ways to accelerate through life without the NEED for discipline.

Of course there is! Imagine you're out in a boat in the ocean of life. You have two power options to move towards the lighthouse: (i.e. your goals)

1. Paddle (grind state)
2. Put up the sail & let the wind drive your progress (flow state)

The grind state is inevitable because sometimes we have bad days & sometimes things are just hard! Learning how to work in the grind state, despite it being uncomfortable, is a BIG key to personal success & progress in life:

• https://www.reddit.com/kaidomac/comments/y7nzj0/no_more_zero_days/

So the next question is, how do we achieve a flow state more often? It really boils down to 2 key things:

1. Choices
2. Energy

For choices, we have the APE Approach. Read through the 2 posts here:

• https://www.reddit.com/hsp/comments/y2jy7p/comment/is4blri/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

APE Approach:

1. Attitude
2. Planning
3. Effort

Believe it or not, our attitude exists independently of the situation. Zig Ziglar has a great talk on that:

• https://youtu.be/_bkVZ1kD8Xo

Two good books to check out are:

• "Attitude is Everything" by Jeff Keller
• "Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl

As far as planning goes, as long as we insist on keeping everything in our head & not writing things down, then we're going to be stuck in a semi-stressed out state because of all of the psychological pressure of having to figure everything out & remember everything mentally!
The lack of a strong personal productivity system makes everything twice as hard as it needs to be. The reality is that our job is to line up a limited number of tin cans on a fence every day & knock them down. The tin cans represent the individual tasks we bother to commit to working on today & the fence represents our 16 waking hours of "time inventory" for the day.
Projects kind of work like an abacus: each project is made up of a row of beads; our job is to move those beads from left to right through our daily efforts. Eventually the project gets done by moving those beads over time through our daily efforts, or in daily practice, by setting up & knocking down individual targets for the day. More on that whole concept here:

• https://www.reddit.com/productivity/comments/11w681u/want_to_be_productive_but_have_nothing_do_to/jcwzft8/?context=3

So that comprises our choices:

1. We get to choose our attitude, regardless of the present circumstances. Failure to accept this level of personal responsibility means that we are then subject to being controlled by (1) our mood state, and (2) the situation(s) we're dealing with in life & are forced to go through life living reactively rather than proactively, which is pretty lame!
2. We get to choose how to plan out our day. We have the opportunity to "wake up prepared", armed with a plan & the preparation that allows us to dive right into being productive & being able to enjoy being productive because we're not fighting indecision, decision fatigue, or a lack of preparation. We can define our discrete assignments, we can make engaging in those assignments easier, we can be more realistic about our available inventory of time each day, we can prime our battlestations for instant engagement, etc. We don't have to merely show up & try to do everything all at once & have to try to remember what to do!
3. We can work smarter, rather than harder. ALL projects, assignments, and commitments boil down to putting in the effort to get them done over time, but we can separate the preparation from the execution, we can design our battlestations to allow us to have better experiences by making things easier & more accessible, we can divvy up our work over time rather than procrastinating, etc.

We can definitely choose a fixed mindset over a growth mindset & have a reactive attitude, refuse to plan out our day & just wing it all the time, and do everything in the heat of the moment based on whatever is emotionally pressuring us to get it done today, but we don't HAVE to live that way!
We can hoist our sails, rather than paddling all the time! We still have transit from point A to point B in order to reach the shore, but we can change our power source along the way! We do that by changing our experience, which means using better tools to help speed our progress up & make it easier!
The other key item is energy. I consider sleep to be my number one productivity tool. Shortchange your body on sleep & we shortchange our ability to more easily get stuff done & to enjoy getting stuff done because then everything is just a slog!

• https://www.reddit.com/kaidomac/comments/s15jmk/sleep\_apnea\_sleeping\_system/

Food is next on the energy priority list: we can eat for high energy! We can learn how to fuel our bodies to give us energy throughout the day:

• https://www.reddit.com/bodyweightfitness/comments/d0rxv6/comment/ezebxg9/?context=3

We can also power up our daily routine through exercise! Here's a very simple starter program:

• https://www.reddit.com/bodyweightfitness/comments/egu9vq/comment/fca4htn/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x

I like to do cardio (indoor exercise bike) & calisthenics at home because (1) they're both weather-independent, and (2) I don't have to go anywhere, like to a gym or park, so I can literally roll out of bed, use the bathroom, bang out my daily exercise routine checklist, and move on with my day:

• https://www.reddit.com/bodyweightfitness/wiki/kb/recommended\_routine/

Imagine the standard approach we tend to take as human beings:

1. Stay up late & not get enough sleep
2. Body is not fed or hydrated specifically for maintaining high energy throughout the day
3. No daily endorphin release from lack of consistent exercise
4. We insist on keeping everything in our head, which results in heavy psychological weight & hoping that we'll just magically remember what to do all the time
5. We let our mood & our circumstances determine our attitude in life, which controls our behavior...if we're not willing to take the first step in a project, we'll never take the second step!
6. We wait until the last minute & procrastinate our progress

We can choose to sail through life by setting things up to make things easier for us! Imagine being well-rested, well-fed, well-hydrated, low-stress, and on top of things all the time! As the saying goes, "we can't squeeze stuff in; we have to take things out!" We can't stay up late, eat poorly, and not use a strong personal productivity system if we want to "hoist our sail" & cruise through our day by knocking down that row of "tin cans" day after day!
part 1/2

Hello,
I have an indoor ONT and the default or whatever Nokia Router you receive when they install your Kinetic Fiber Service.
My main question is what Router could I buy or should I buy to where I could get near 1 GIG wifi speeds throughout the house?
I am getting 500-600 now via wifi and around 1 GIG via Ethernet Cable.
Even if 1 GIG is not possible on wifi with routers today, I still think I want to replace this modem with something more Fancy and Capable.
Maybe a really cool gaming router or a fancy industrial router ...
ASUS ROG Rapture WiFi 6E Gaming Router (GT-AXE16000) - Quad-Band, 6 GHz Ready, Dual 10G Ports, 2.5G WAN Port, AiMesh Support, Triple-Level Game Acceleration
or
TP-Link Deco AX3000 WiFi 6 Mesh System(Deco X55) - Covers up to 6500 Sq.Ft. , Replaces Wireless Router and Extender, 3 Gigabit ports per unit, supports Ethernet Backhaul (3-pack)
I just need to make sure the New Replacement Third Party Router can handle IPOE, correct?
Please give me some recommendations when you have a moment and or possible insights of what not to do or what to do.
Thanks!

Hello,
I have an indoor ONT and the default or whatever Nokia Router you receive when they install your Kinetic Fiber Service.
My main question is what Router could I buy or should I buy to where I could get near 1 GIG wifi speeds throughout the house?
I am getting 500-600 now via wifi and around 1 GIG via Ethernet Cable.
Even if 1 GIG is not possible on wifi with routers today, I still think I want to replace this modem with something more Fancy and Capable.
Maybe a really cool gaming router or a fancy industrial router ...
ASUS ROG Rapture WiFi 6E Gaming Router (GT-AXE16000) - Quad-Band, 6 GHz Ready, Dual 10G Ports, 2.5G WAN Port, AiMesh Support, Triple-Level Game Acceleration
or
TP-Link Deco AX3000 WiFi 6 Mesh System(Deco X55) - Covers up to 6500 Sq.Ft. , Replaces Wireless Router and Extender, 3 Gigabit ports per unit, supports Ethernet Backhaul (3-pack)
I just need to make sure the New Replacement Third Party Router can handle IPOE, correct?
Please give me some recommendations when you have a moment and or possible insights of what not to do or what to do.
Thanks!

Hello,
I have an indoor ONT and the default or whatever Nokia Router you receive when they install your Kinetic Fiber Service.
My main question is what Router could I buy or should I buy to where I could get near 1 GIG wifi speeds throughout the house?
I am getting 500-600 now via wifi and around 1 GIG via Ethernet Cable.
Even if 1 GIG is not possible on wifi with routers today, I still think I want to replace this modem with something more Fancy and Capable.
Maybe a really cool gaming router or a fancy industrial router ...
ASUS ROG Rapture WiFi 6E Gaming Router (GT-AXE16000) - Quad-Band, 6 GHz Ready, Dual 10G Ports, 2.5G WAN Port, AiMesh Support, Triple-Level Game Acceleration
or
TP-Link Deco AX3000 WiFi 6 Mesh System(Deco X55) - Covers up to 6500 Sq.Ft. , Replaces Wireless Router and Extender, 3 Gigabit ports per unit, supports Ethernet Backhaul (3-pack)
I just need to make sure the New Replacement Third Party Router can handle IPOE, correct?
Please give me some recommendations when you have a moment and or possible insights of what not to do or what to do.
Thanks!

Hello,
I have an indoor ONT and the default or whatever Nokia Router you receive when they install your Kinetic Fiber Service.
My main question is what Router could I buy or should I buy to where I could get near 1 GIG wifi speeds throughout the house?
I am getting 500-600 now via wifi and around 1 GIG via Ethernet Cable.
Even if 1 GIG is not possible on wifi with routers today, I still think I want to replace this modem with something more Fancy and Capable.
Maybe a really cool gaming router or a fancy industrial router ...
ASUS ROG Rapture WiFi 6E Gaming Router (GT-AXE16000) - Quad-Band, 6 GHz Ready, Dual 10G Ports, 2.5G WAN Port, AiMesh Support, Triple-Level Game Acceleration
or
TP-Link Deco AX3000 WiFi 6 Mesh System(Deco X55) - Covers up to 6500 Sq.Ft. , Replaces Wireless Router and Extender, 3 Gigabit ports per unit, supports Ethernet Backhaul (3-pack)
I just need to make sure the New Replacement Third Party Router can handle IPOE, correct?
Please give me some recommendations when you have a moment and or possible insights of what not to do or what to do.
Thanks!

Context: 27, male, athlete but not sprinter (lacrosse), current training focused around strength lifts and agility ladder type drills, but no direct sprint/speed work
A few days ago I had some performance metrics tested and these were the results:
30m sprint: 4.122s, 20m split: 2.974s, 10m fly (30m total-20m split): 1.148s, 5-10-5 drill: 4.48s
I’m wondering how to make sense of the numbers and what to focus on in training to drop the overall 30m time. After trying to find some normative data online, it seems like the 10m fly time is the relative weakness, meaning I should work on developing top end speed? I included the 5-10-5 for a more well rounded picture of acceleration ability but not sure how that translates to a straight line sprint, or if it does at all. Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated, thank you!
Edit: conditions for 30m were indoors, electronic gate timed, two point start, normal brooks running shoes

Grab a cup of tea, some snacks and sit down comfortably, because what you’re about to read is a long but important piece of the puzzle confirming the prison planet theory, which shows that the tunnel of light is a soul trap & implant station, how the Archons (Greys, Mantis beings, Reptilians) lure free beings into physical bodies, lock them inside them, mind wipe them, implant them, and then use them for whatever purposes they need.
If we want to defeat the enemy, or at least escape the reincarnation cycle and this whole situation when our physical bodies die, it’s crucial that we understand how these things work, so that we know how to best proceed. These beings possess extremely advanced technology that can not only affect physical matter, it can affect and manipulate energy, including our souls.
Truman Cash is an alien abductee and afterlife/past life regression researcher. Through hypnotherapy, he discovered that at some point in his past, while he was travelling through space as a free energy being, his soul was detected while in the proximity of the Earth, then was caught, mind wiped, put into a newborn’s body and became trapped in Earth’s reincarnation cycle for thousands of years. He even recounts being forced to do the work for the Archons at some point in his past, by helping them trap other free beings inside physical bodies. While under hypnosis, he also saw himself having been temporarily put inside an adult’s body a number of times, a phenomenon known as ‘walk-ins’. The following information comes from his book (which you can download for free):
“From December 3, 1995, to January 7, 1996, I recovered the memories of several in-between lives incidents. In so doing, I learned how I became trapped in the reincarnation cycle of Earth. Consequently, I discovered one of the most guarded secrets about extra-terrestrial manipulation.
I didn't become trapped into the embodiment cycle on Earth until 12,389 years ago. Before this time I was a free being. By "free being" I mean that I was a spiritual being who was not yet trapped into a compulsive, involutary reincarnation cycle. I was free to be in a body or not be in body by my own choice. I could be in a body without being "stuck" in a body. I spent most of my time just being a free being without being in a body at all. There were times, however, when I was temporarily placed in a body at implant stations. In these cases I would eventually get free of the body and continue on my merry way as a free being. As you will see, the difference here on Earth is that there is a SYSTEM to create amnesia and keep a being trapped in a seemingly endless, revolving door CYCLE of re-embodiments.
Free beings are invisible to the naked eye. However, they can create and project a visible form or energy, which can be seen by the naked eye. This sometimes occurs in the "ghost" phenomenon. It is not difficult to locate the position of a "ghost" (Le. a being without a body) in a room, and one can even communicate with it. I have personally experienced this phenomenon. Cats--as you may already have observed-are very good at spotting beings.
Before I became trapped on Earth I had been hanging around this area for thousands of years, having interactions with beings in bodies, both terrestrial and extra-terrestrial. For example, one day I was hanging around Atlantis when I spotted a young man and woman lying in the grass overlooking the ocean. I threw them together, causing them to engage in sexual intercourse. I went into both bodies simultaneously, experiencing the pleasures of sex as a third party, even though I had no body of my own.
Of course, this was the wrong thing for me to do, but I also mention it here to illustrate that free beings are not always the most ethical beings. Activities like this tend to give free beings a bad name. Sometimes free beings will touch a body and kill it. Therefore, free beings incite beings in bodies to invent electronic methods to trap free beings, so that they are not so much of a nuisance. Consequently, there has been a long-term battle between free beings and beings in bodies. I should also note that originally we were all free beings before we became trapped in the physical universe. Therefore, life has been sliding down a slippery slope over a very, very long time period.
When one engages in extensive past life therapy, one will uncover many different types of implant stations. These are spirit traps that are designed to trick a free being and then force the being into a body. The common denominator of these experiences is electronics. There are many different types of high-tech electronic methods to accomplish this; it appears that electromagnetics plays a key role in this process. What I find amazing is that beings without bodies can be effectively controlled with electronics. As incredible as this sounds, this phenomenon is indeed common, and anyone can contact many such experiences in the past.
In fact, we all have experienced both sides of the equation. That is, we have all been victims of these implanting techniques, and we have also been the victimizers. In spite of some people's "holier than thou" attitude, we have all had a checkered past.
For example, on December 3, 1995 I uncovered an incident that started out with me as a free being in space. I became interested in a very large, disk-shaped craft, so I entered it. I was then pushed by an electronic force field into a small confinement area near the edge of the inside of the craft. I was then "sucked" into a body via some type of electronic intense tractor beam. Then I was anchored in the body through a series of electronic wave pulses that felt like very intense electric shocks. It overwhelmed me and then just beat me into the head of this body.
Two tall beings with skinny arms, legs, and necks and enlarged craniums approached the implanting device. One of the beings said (telepathically): "You're one of us now." These two beings then escorted me and my new body to a control tower in the center of this craft. The craft was open on the inside with no dividing walls and was the size of a football stadium (except that it was circular). The two beings then instructed me how to operate the instruments in the control room to entrap other beings into bodies. I then became an implanter right after having become an implantee. In another incident I was traveling around the universe with a friend who was also a free being. This was really fun, because it was like being on vacation all the time and seeing new and interesting things. And the nice thing about being cosmic tourists was that we didn't have to have money, food, lodging, etc., and we didn't have to be home at any certain time.
We came upon an implant station on a planet, which captured my interest. A naked man sat in a chair between four posts. Several naked women were sexually stimulating the male body. My good friend, sensing the imminent danger, cautioned me not to approach this place. Unfortunately, I disregarded his warning and entered the male body to experience the sexual encounter. At this point someone turned the juice on (electronics) and anchored me into the male body. As I later discovered in my past life research, sex has long been used as a method to entice free beings into bodies.
In a more recent incident as a free being in the Earth area, I was working for an ET group-I believe their name was something like the "Theolosians" or "Thelosians." I was working out of a large disk-shaped craft above Earth. It was my job to go out and bring in beings to be implanted in bodies.
In this incident I found a disk-shaped Grays ship, and the occupants of the craft had just abducted a human being off of Earth. The human was lying on the examination table, and tall Grays stood on both sides of the table working on the abductee. I entered the craft and observed their activities.
Surprisingly, I found that their equipment and abduction procedures were exactly the same then as they are now. Since this incident took place about 15,290 years ago, this indicates to me that they have the ability to time travel. I do not believe that their methods, technology, and activities would remain unchanged over a 15,000 year time span.
As the Grays busily occupied themselves with this abductee, I circled around to the back of the head of the tall Gray that was standing next to the table (on the abductee's left side). I entered the Grays head and then latched onto the being and pulled the being out of its head. I then took this being over to the Thelosian ship where a body was waiting to be implanted with a being.
This humanoid body was short and stocky and was strapped into a chair. I placed the being inside the head of this body and then backed away from the chair. I was able to hold the being in the body even though I was more than thirty feet away from it. Someone turned the juice on the electronic chair and anchored this being into the body.
As I re-experienced this incident I felt remorse for having trapped this Gray in another body against its will. As much as I despise Grays, this is not something that I am willing to experience myself.
This incident also demonstrated that at this point in my existence, I had more abilities without a body than with one. I pulled this being out of its Gray body, it demonstrated that I was more powerful as a being than it was. When I held onto that being as he was being electronized into its new body, it was like I had a very long, invisible arm. Of course, I have since lost these abilities. However, I do believe that we have the potential for recovering our inherent abilities as powerful spiritual beings.
This incident may also indicate why I am an abductee, a "Chosen One." Initially, I was a problem for the Grays. Therefore, they may have targeted me for entrapment and disempowerment to keep me from interfering with their activities here on Earth. So now the Grays are a problem for me.
December 6, 1995 Memory Recovery Session:
12,389 years ago I was out in space-as a free being-and looking down at Earth. I didn't notice that a very large, black, spherical implant station was approaching me, because my attention was focused on the planet. An invisible, electronic tractor beam locked onto me and began pulling me into a circular, concave structure on the implant station. The extreme power of this tractor beam overwhelmed me and made me feel awful. In spite of my abilities as a free being, I couldn't fight free. I was pulled into the entrance, which was a tunnel in the center of the concave surface. I was then accelerated down this long, curved tunnel toward the LIGHT at the end of the tunnel. (My colloquialism for this type of implant station is a "soul sucker.").
After being totally overwhelmed by this energy beam and pulled through this tunnel, I began to feel very lethargic. I then found myself in an implanting room, being compressed into a female body by a powerful, WHITE LIGHT energy beam that beat me into a body. This energy beam was so irritating that I felt like screaming. I began to try to fight back with the body. That's when they knew that the implantation was finished--because I was using MY BODY to fight back.
Two tall insectoid beings that looked like praying mantises then escorted me to another part of the implant station. I was now in a very large, WHITE LIGHT room. I milled around aimlessly amongst other human bodies in this dense, fog-like LIGHT. Through telepathic hypnosis I hear a very soothing, hypnotic voice whispering in my head: "Sleep. Don't worry. We'll take care of you. Don't remember. You have no past. You will not need to remember your past. Be here now. No more thoughts of the past. Forget the past. Move forward into a new life. You will begin a new life in the LIGHT. "
After I was thoroughly inculcated in this WHITE LIGHT amnesia room, two insectoids approached me and told me that I was ready to begin my new life. They escorted me into another large, open area of the implant station, which was a hangar containing many flying disks. They walked me across the hangar and up the ramp of one of the flying saucers. I got a big surprise in this session when I saw what the inside of this ship looked like-It was a carbon copy of Ra' s ship, the eye of Ra! The only difference was that this ship didn't have a throne in it.
The insectoids then flew me down to Atlantis in this craft. When we landed, I walked down the ramp and into the WHITE LIGHT amnesia fog outside the craft. Apparently, ETs can create this "fog" outdoors as well as indoors. One of the praying mantis guys told me that I won't remember anything and that I'll start my new life now. Then they took off and left me alone in the hills overlooking the ocean.
I began walking inland. Eventually, some Atlanteans found me and decided that I'd make a good sacrifice. I ended up in a temple lying on a stone sarcophagus. They cut my chest open with a large knife, drank my blood, and ate my heart. This was the same Brothers of the Snake initiation that I experienced in Egypt over 9,000 years later! I then left my body and reported in at the same implant station. I then bounced back to Atlantis and entered the womb of a mother who was giving birth to a baby girl. This time they did not implant me into a body on the implant station. Instead, they simply programmed me to go back to Atlantis and enter a baby's body during birth.
I spent the rest of my life in this house. The house in which I was born had a beautiful view above the cliffs overlooking the ocean. I grew up in this house and continued living there even after my parents died. I died in this house and then reported in again to the same implant station.
On December 5, 1995 I uncovered another in-between lives incident that demonstrated a slightly different type of implantation technique. I have included the entire transcript of this session here. My wife guided me through this incident four times. You will notice that new details surface each time I run through the incident. Researchers who are standard familiar with hypnotic techniques may notice some of the differences between the techniques that we use and and standard hypnotic procedures.
"Recall the last session. "
"That was when I was put in a body. " (This was the December 3rd session described above.)
"Scan the last incident. "
"I was trained to trap beings in bodies, but I didn't recall any specific incident of putting beings in bodies. It's amazing how they can compress beings into a very small head. "
"Did we get everything from that incident?"
"Yes. "
"Return to an earlier, similar incident. "
"There's something there-a queasiness in my stomach and that leg jerk in my right leg. This involves an alien, a bug-like one, a praying mantis-like alien. I have the impression of a voice, possibly programming. Something flashed in my head. I'm just going on impressions. I saw that foggy LIGHT. I hear a voice say 'Go to the LIGHT, ' and I go to the LIGHT. It feels like I'm in a big room. For some reason I popped back to my school days; I don't know Why. " (In retrospect, I believe this occurred because the WHITE LIGHT room in this incident reminded me of a big gymnasium.) "This sounds so absurd, but I'll go ahead and tell you. I have the impression of being put in a body and into a capsule and being sent down to a planet in this capsule. There's that terrible feeling in my body like something terrible's happening to me. This praying mantis-like being over me. It's right before I'm put into this capsule. It seems like this thing lands in the water by a beach, a tropical area. I think I'm totally naked. "
"Start at the beginning of this incident and see if you can pick up more details. "
"I'm not going to the beginning-about the middle of the incident. The phrase "Go to the LIGHT. " It's an implant station. I see a big round sphere, like a space station maybe. "
"What happens next?"
"The insect guy. I think right before that, I'm in an area that feels like a round room, and there's this intense, WHIT, blinding LIGHT coming from the walls." (The room that I was in was a sphere with a diameter of about twelve feet. The walls of the inside of this sphere were radiating this bright, WHITE LIGHT force field.) "There's a struggle to counteract the force of the LIGHT that's 360 degrees (around me), that's forcing me into this body. I feel it in my body-not just my head-in my torso. They're not just compressing me into a head. Oh man, don't go to the LIGHT. This sphere opens on one end, making a vesica pisces. It's interesting how that ties in”.
[The vesica piscis shape is formed by the intersection of two circles. It looks like a typical flying disk standing on its edge or the vertical slits in the eyes of cats and snakes. It is the same shape as the Christian fish symbol for Jesus, only without the fins. It was also an ancient fertility symbol representing the vulva.]
“I walk out (through the vesica pisces opening in the sphere). I'm in my body. I'm naked. I'm in a big--high ceiling-big area. It seems rather circular all throughout implant station. I feel like I'm beamed up into another room high above it. It's the room where they lay you down on a table. It's a control room. It's not a box-type room. It's weird. These beings, I don't believe, are Grays. They have long, thin legs like an insect. They communicate telepathically. I lie on the table. They do something to me here, like high voltage or something. I think this process is they're anchoring me into my head.”
"What kind of a body do you have?”
"It's male. It's hairy, with a caucasian skin. The thing that pops into my mind: that these beings are 'ancients’. I saw that in a TV show, but it's like a knowingness that they're ancients. Down by my feet is a cocoon-shaped capsule. The conveyor slides me into it, and the top is put on. I'm shut in this capsule and shot onto this planet. I think it's Earth."
"When is this?"
"I don't know. It (the capsule) lands in the sea by an island on the shore of a sandy beach. I'm not sure of the time at all. "
"Return to the beginning of the incident. "
"Okay. I'm going into a big, huge sphere, space station. I'm going through a tunnel of LIGHT. At the end of the tunnel is this room-and a body--with intense LIGHIT & power that just presses and pushes on me, forces me into this body. I can feel the body now, as it (the force field) pushes me in. It's caucasian, naked, male."
[At this point I compare my present body and genitalia with the body that I'm being forced into in this incident.]
"Then this vesica piscis thing opens up. I walk out a ways. It's starting to make sense: It's programming you to be an infant and go out the birth canal."
[I had just realized that they designed this elaborate entrapment scheme to parallel the natural birth process where one is pushed out through a tunnel (birth canal) towards the LIGHT at the end of the tunnel and through the vesica piscis opening (vulva)]
"There's a huge, vast area of the ship, huge, high ceiling, the wall goes up." (The implanting sphere was located in this very large room.) "A beam comes down from the ceiling, well over a hundred yards up. I'm floated up the beam into this room. They guide me along (telepathically): 'Walk this way, please. Lie on the table, please. ' They're polite. I lie on this metal table. There's power surges here again. It concentrates me into the head of the body. They have praying mantis looks. Long necks. When I try to look at its face, my head hurts. I feel really sad.”
"Why do you feel sad?"
"Because they put me in a body. They tricked me. They put me in a capsule and shoot it out of the . . . uh, shoot it out to a planet. It lands in an ocean by a beach. It opens up, and I go out. It's tropical and warm."
"Give me a flash answer--When is this?"
"Something like five thousand years ago. It's the first thing that comes to mind. Warm weather. A lot of food. That's where I live. Fifteen thousand or five thousand--I'm not sure. I wonder if I was a free being. " (Sometimes two or more dates can appear simultaneously if there are other similar incidents that have been triggered.)
"Give me a flash answer-What planet is this?"
"Earth. "
"Return to the beginning of the incident."
"I think the beginning is when I died. It's a battIe with swords. I think a sword goes right through me, in my abdomen. I hear this ('Go to the LIGHT')-I'm out of my body--I don't know if somebody communicates this to me or what, but I'm going to the LIGHT, a tunnel of LIGHT, very fast. This LIGHT goes to this implant station that's just huge. Reminds me of a small planet or moon. It's just really huge. At the end of the tunnel of LIGHT in this room with glowing WHlTE LIGHT, there's a body in the middle of the room. The LIGHT just pushes me into the body. There's some pressure in my head. The sphere opens up making a doorway that I walk out of (the vesica piscis-shaped opening). I walk out into the middle of the room. I walk and I float up to this room where these 'ancients' are, the praying mantis guys. I'm a white male. I go over to the capsule. It opens up. One side of the room kind of zigzags and goes up-a control panel-a 'star Trek' type of thing. In the capsule they give me an electric shock. It further anchors me in my body and specifically the head. The mantis guy gives me a telepathic command to be in my head. They do some other stuff to drive me into my head--intense 'machine-gun,' like a pneumatic hammer. Drives you into your head. When he finishes with that, the capsule comes together. It's not smooth (on the outside), it's molded, it's got indented sections. They shoot this capsule down to this planet--Earth. It lands in the ocean. I get out on the beach. It seems like they retrieve these capsules after they land. It seems like the battle I was in was in the Middle East. I think it was five thousand and some years ago. "
"Do you think you got everything out of this incident?"
"5,349 years ago. Don't go to the LIGHT. I was right about that. That makes sense--the Serpent Staff group. The New Age LIGHT. It's part of the trap. "
"Is it okay to leave this incident?"
"Yes. "
On December 9, 1995, J gave me a session in which I covered several similar incidents of going in and out of bodies on this planet. I came to this solar system as a free being 55,539 years ago. I entered a spacecraft that was headed for Earth. I entered the body of the mission leader, a powerful and self-determined woman. She had a gorgeous body with the build of an athlete. I was not programmed to enter her body--I entered of my own free will. I then covered another free will incident 25,329 years ago where I again entered a woman's body on Earth.
The following incidents occurred after I became stuck in the programmed re-embodiment cycle on Earth. I uncovered more significant data regarding extra-terrestrial manipulation, so I have included most of the transcript of this session. December 9, 1995 Memory Recovery Session:
"Recall a similar incident. "
"I have this pain that started yesterday on the right side of my spine. I'm in a body. A spear or something is into me from the back. Male body. I have a beard. This is Earth. It feels like my hands are tied with rope up on a scaffolding. I'm being punished. Then I go out of the body up to an implant station. It's the same type of 'into the LIGHT' where you mill around (WHITE LIGHT room). Then I'm sent down to Babylon into a baby's body. I went into the (man's) body while it was being tortured--or maybe 1 was being 'put' in. "(I couldn't contact any of this man's memories, so I knew I had not lived his life.) "There's this scaffolding with ropes that tie onto the legs and arms. I'm viewing this from the back of the guy, then I go into the body. Something to do with an implant station, the same type of implant station. Apparently, I'm just sent down to this body while it's being tortured or punished. There was a spear being shoved through the back near the right shoulder blade. Then I go up to the implant station--back and forth. "
"Give me a flash answer-When was this?"
"5,619 years ago. Then I went up to the station to be born into a male baby born in Babylon. I get a feeling it wasn't too bad of a life there. "
"Recall a similar incident. "
"I'm coming into this body (my present body). Coming down-I'm not sure how I got here--coming down in Spokane, seeing Sacred Heart hospital from up above. I'm getting in the body inside my mother and being pushed out. I'm trying to figure out where I came from before that. I died in 1945 and went up to the implant station. It seems I always report in to the same one. The tunnel of LIGHT. I went into the room where the people are milling around. I went into the back of the head of one of the people. I'm being programmed: “Be in the LIGHT. Always return to the LIGHT. Safe refuge. No fear.” I can see why people are drawn to it. It's like taking a vacation, milling around in the WHITE LIGHT. There's no pain there. You're being programmed to be a sheep. You aren't exposed to stuff. There are other parts of the ship where you are rammed into bodies with force beams."
I uncovered one more incident in this session. I discovered that I had lived a short lifetime between 1945 and 1949. When I died in 1945, I went out to the implant station and then came right back to Earth. Although J didn't ask me where I was born, I believe it was Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I lived with my mother and father in an apartment above a busy street. At age four I rushed out into a street and was hit by a car. I then left my body and reported in to my usual implant station and bounced back down to Sacred Heart hospital in Spokane where I entered my present body in 1949.
I had previously covered my birth this lifetime in a session in 1983. I remembered vividly what the hospital looked like before I entered it from above. However, I hadn't remembered how I got to the hospital. In 1986 I was in Sacred Hospital, and I was confused because it didn't look like the same building that I remembered going into in 1949. I found out that the building had been drastically remodeled, so I asked to see some of the old pictures of what it used to look like. When I saw the picture of what the hospital looked like in 1949, I was very surprised to find that the picture showed the very same building that I had seen before I entered my present body. In fact, this photograph showed the east side of the hospital, which was the same side that I had viewed it from, but only from a higher vantage point. On January 7, 1996 I found that I needed to address my death as Ramesses II. I am including all of J notes on this session. because I had some very big realizations. In fact, at one point I began verbalizing my realizations so rapidly that J couldn't keep up with me. Consequently, she was unable to write it all down. Therefore, I have parenthetically expressed these cognitions in the following transcript:
January 7, 1996 Memory Recovery Session
"3,219 years ago was when I died (as Ramesses II). There was an incident. I'm lying in the bed, dying."
"Run that incident, please."
"I'm an old man, and there's servants coming in and paying homage to me, the Son of Ra." I don't have any fear of dying, because I believe that I am immortal. Even my body will be renewed when I go to live with the Gods. I died of just old age. I'm old."
"How old are you?"
"Eighty-nine is just the number that really pops out there. It must have been all that good sex. My body dies, and I go out. I go to the implant station, down the tube or tunnel. It appears the tunnel is curved. I'm in a WHITE LIGHT now. It seems like I'm being put into a body again. I'm in another body again."
"What kind of body is it?"
"A male body."
"Human?"
"Yes. I'm taken to the WHITE LIGHT room again with all the bodies milling around. This is 3,219 years ago. They program 'PEACE and REST.' The idea here is to create a place that is enjoyable to be in. 'GOD LOVES YOU. YOU ARE LOVED'-like whisperings in my mind, soothing. 'JOY and LOVE.' I can ALWAYS RETURN TO THE LIGHT. BE IN PEACE.' The insect guys take me out of the LIGHT room. It seems like the same implant station I always go to or an identical one, because it looks like the same one. I go into an 'eye.' I walk up the ramp of the 'eye.' I'm inside. I feel like I'm naked. I sit down on the ... It's the same type of ship as Ra's. I sit on the circular bleachers that go up. I'm on a different side of the room (than the Atlantis incident). I'm sitting here in the saucer, in the 'eye.' I'm in this new body. I'm in an 'eye.' The saucer lands somewhere. I walk down the ramp. It's a bright, sunny day-warm day. It appears I'm in a sandy desert. It appears I'm back in Egypt again. It appears that the ship landed by the pyramids, the Giza Plateau."
"In this new body, do you have any sense of your last lifetime? Do you recall it?"
"Yes and no. It all looks very familiar to me. I'm naked, so somebody comes and puts a robe on me."
"Are you in an adult body?"
"Yes."
“Does the person who brings you the robe speak to you?"
"There's more than one person. It's like I'm greeted. I get the feeling that I walk into some kind of high position. I get the impression I'm kind of like a teacher now. I feel like I'm a high priest, not the pharaoh. I'm still serving the Gods. I'm instructing the people with the belief system of (physical) immortality. It's hard for me to admit this, but it's true in a sense. I just left an old body and was given a new body. I feel an uneasiness about this. It's like I'm a little drugged. I'm really restimulated by this-a little spinny." (By "restimulated" I meant that something had triggered something in the unconscious part of my mind, and it was uncomfortable.)
"Return to the beginning of the incident."
"3,219 years ago I'm the pharaoh of Egypt. I'm dying, and everybody seems to know that. I don't feel bad about dying. I'm looking forward to immortality with the Gods, the belief system that we're taught. I'm dying of old age. I leave my body and pulled into a tunnel of LIGHT. It just pulls you like a force you can't resist." (It's like a soul-sucking tractor beam.) "It just sucks you in. It's almost the exact parallel to when I was first put in a body (12,389 years ago in the Atlantis incident where I was sacrificed). There's a sphere about twelve feet in diameter (the LIGHT at the end of the tunnel). The walls of this device are glowing with a WHITE LIGHT. There’s a male body in the middle of this sphere. I'm being squeezed into the body. It's very confining. I step out into this big room. Two beings ... I'm not sure what kind of beings these are."
"Can you look at them?"
"At first I thought they were LIGHT BEINGS. These are the praying mantis guys! They take me into the WHITE, misty LIGHT. I'm being programmed: 'PEACE, REST-soothing whispering in my mind. The words: 'GOD LOVES YOU. PEACE IN THE LIGHT. ' I'm being programmed that I'm with GOD now. 'ALWAYS RETURN TO THE LIGHT. ' I can see why people think going to the LIGHT is good, because it FEELS good. 'I WILL BEGIN A NEW LIFE NOW. THE OLD IS PASSED AWAY. YOU'LL BE SAFE IN THE LIGHT. YOU CAN ALWAYS COME TO THE LIGHT. ' You feel like you're really loved, and you're really special." (When I said 'really loved' and 'really special,' I said it in a soothing, but sarcastic tone. Their programming is very sweet, but very insincere and phony. I have observed the same kind of syrupy sweet, deceitful rhetoric from the channeled Pleiadians.) "So I'm taken out (of the big WHITE LIGHT room). I get the impression that they are LIGHT BEINGS, but they're not! "
"What is a LIGHT BEING?"
"A body that is just LIGHT. But it's not. They're the insect guys! I go to the hangar where the 'eyes' are. I sit down in the saucer (Apparently, the insectoids were using telepathic hypnosis to create the illusion that they were light beings.)
"Are you the only one?"
"Yes, except there's someone flying it. I just sit there for awhile. They're taking me somewhere. It's bright outside when I get out. I'm naked. There's a greeting party there. I'm telepathically told to go down the ramp. It's really bright outside. (I assumed that I was flown down to the planet by a praying mantis guy. Whoever did pilot the craft remained out of sight in the pilot's cabin. No ETs made a public appearance in front of the greeting party.)
"When you are greeted by these people, do they say anything to you?"
"Not direct. They're treating me like a holy person or something. They help me into a robe and sandals or footwear, and some kind of a head gear, tall."
"Are there any buildings around you-a town or something?"
"We're out in the Giza plateau. I ride in this guy's chariot. We're heading east toward the Nile. Apparently, now I'm part of the priesthood. One of my sons is pharaoh. The big pyramid at Giza has been a big part of my life and also as a priest. We continue the rituals in the Great Pyramid. It's continuous. I help perpetuate this--the drinking of blood. I don't think there ever was a capstone on the top of the pyramid. As far as my lifetimes in this period-Ramses the second and the following lifetime as a holy man-the best I can translate it is that I came out of the eye of the Gods, and so I was worshipped. "
"What is your name as the priest?"
"Part of my name is Amen. " (I tried to pronounce my name as it was pronounced in Egypt then, but couldn't quite get it.) "In the Egyptian language it sounds like nonsense syllables. It's easier for me to contact what it meant. "
"What did it mean?"
"Holy man from God. But just 'holy man' is the main meaning. It sounds strange, but I almost feel like a Jesus figure. This is like the same type of being-You come from the Gods; you're a teacher. There's a feeling of 'holiness' about me. It's strange. I get the feeling that I channeled. I was programmed, and part of that programming was receiving messages from ETs (via channeling) to keep the religion going. I think this is what Jesus was-like a high priest. This was over 1200 years before that time. It's funny how back then, they landed their saucers in front of everybody. In that lifetime I became the high priest. They took care of me for awhile-a pope-that sort of thing.”
"How much time passed between your death as Ramses and your return as priest?"
"Just a few hours. It seems like a few hours. I'm not sure of who I was. It doesn't seem like I knew, when I got out of the saucer, who I was. I don't know what the people were told who I was. They were nice to me and took care of me and fed me. Between the programming and channeling I was a messenger of God, a holy man of all the Gods. I didn't just represent one God. I continued the rituals of the Brotherhood of the Snake. I was the one that initiated my own son, the Pharaoh, in the Brotherhood of the Snake. This all occurred 3,219 years ago. I'm sure of it."
It appears that electromagnetics plays a key role in this procedure. I suddenly realized that they were using the nervous system of the body-including the brain, of course-to implant beings into bodies. The nerves transmit electrical charges, which creates electromagnetic fields around the body. The chakras are simply nerve networks, which create electromagnetic fields. (This, however, may be an oversimplification of the phenomenon.)
In the Serpent religions-especially the eastern religious practices and New Age channeled religious practices--a lot of attention is placed on meditation on the chakras, "clearing" the chakras, and channeling energy through the chakras. In so doing, a spiritual being in a body only anchors itself further in the body by sending energy pulses through these nerve networks. I have actually experienced this phenomenon during a "Consciousness and Energy" (C & E) exercise taught by the channeled entity, Ramtha. After doing the exercise I became more solidly anchored in my body and was very sick with the "C & E flu" for over two weeks. Also, just the condition of placing undue attention on the body helps reinforce attachment to the body.
I had a great deal of communication with "channeled Pleiadians" in my association with a woman who was trained to channel Pleiadians by Barbara Marciniak. These so-called Pleiadians had me "clearing my chakras" as one of the procedures I had to perform in order to end my abductions. I followed their advice to the letter--including giving unconditional love to the Grays--and they eventually informed me that I would no longer be abducted by Grays, because I had successfully fulfilled their requirements. However, I was abducted and re-implanted with a debilitating brain implant about two weeks after they told me this. Three other "psychics" who channel ETs have since tried to free me from abductions. All have failed-and they failed in spite of their very confident reassurances that I would no longer be an abductee after performing their various procedures. The abductions have never ceased. I eventually came to my senses and realized that the "Pleiadians" and other channeled ETs had manipulated and deceived me.
The Pleiadians-in both ancient and modern times--have established religious practices focused especially on the lower chakra, the network of nerves of the genital area. The channeled Pleiadians of today call it "sacred sexuality." The kundalini of tantric Yoga is simply the channeling of energy from the lower chakra, through the other chakras, and up through the brain. Not surprisingly, it is sometimes referred to as "Serpent" power. These deceptive practices only serve to keep people's attention focused on their bodies and keep us distracted with dead-end religious practices. Under these conditions one would not easily discover what's really going on. The discovery of the truth, of course, might eventually lead to extricating oneself from the mandatory re-embodiment cycle on this planet. This is why ETs expend so much time and energy programming people with bogus religious beliefs.
The Grays, Reptilians, Pleiadians, Insectoids all use the WHITE LIGHT rooms to program earthbound humans. This phenomenon illustrates a conspiratorial network between several races of ETs. Today, however, they don't land in public places like they used to. They also don't bring down people from implant stations like they used to. It appears that the phenomenon of "walk-ins" is on the increase, however. Channeled entities are deceiving us as to the purpose of these insidious, covert extra-terrestrial activities.
Many people today are reporting near death experiences (NDEs) in which they travel swiftly through a tunnel toward the LIGHT. When they reach the LIGHT at the end of the tunnel they sometimes report seeing "beings of LIGHT. " They sometimes believe they have traveled to some kind of spiritual realm. From my own experiences these "beings of LIGHT" were insectoids. They only "appeared" to be LIGHT beings, due to their uncanny ET ability to create illusions in the minds of abductees, whether out of body or in the body. This ability, as I have mentioned before, can be best described as "telepathic hypnosis; " other researchers use the term "screen memories". Grays also possess this incredible ability to manipulate people's minds and emotions, and they often use this ability to create an illusion of benevolence and love. This is one of the reasons why some abductees think Grays are good. Reptilians also possess this ability, and it would be reasonable to assume that other ET groups also use telepathic hypnosis.

I would like to introduce a company that some may already know, but with high potential. Nextech3D.AI (formally "Nextech AR Solutions Corp" or the "Company") (OTCQX: NEXCF) (CSE: NTAR) (FSE: EP2) is a diversified augmented reality, AI technology company leveraging proprietary artificial intelligence ( AI) to create 3D experiences for the metaverse. Its main activities are the creation of photorealistic WebAR 3D models for the Prime Ecommerce Marketplace and for many other online retailers. The Company develops or acquires what it believes to be disruptive technologies and, once commercialized, transforms them into autonomous public companies that issue a stock dividend to shareholders while retaining a significant ownership stake in the public spin-out. Inside there are several companies that will soon be spun off and made public as was the case for arway last year, returning real value to shareholders given the rise of Arway in just 2 months since its debut.
the companies currently within it are the following:
Nextech Event Solutions (NES) is a cutting-edge event management platform providing industry-leading software to event professionals, special event venues, exhibitors, and commercial entities around the world. Nextech Event Solutions' suite of services enables event executives and planners to seamlessly plan, manage, and deliver exceptional events and immersive event experiences in the estimated $50 billion global meetings and events industry.
To learn more about Nextech Event Solutions (NES), please visit our website: https://www.nextechevents.com
ARitize 3D is your one-stop-shop AR solution with automated 3D model creation at an unbeatable price. Our Artificial Intelligence (AI) will turn your existing 2D product images into high-quality 3D and Augmented Reality experiences. It's fast, it's easy and it will transform your e-commerce website.
With a 3D model, clients can interact with the product to see every detail: turn it, spin it, zoom in, zoom out, leading to 40% lower product returns, 93% higher click-through rate and a 90% reduction in product photography costs. The Company believes that this value creation and ROI are leading to the rapidly growing demand for the Company's 3D technology. Transform your online store into a dynamic virtual showroom. 3D models allow customers to see products from every angle and position them in their own space prior to purchasing. It's an exciting, immersive shopping experience that keeps customers more engaged, and better informed and helps your brand stand out from the competition.
Toggle3D is an AR enhanced standalone web application which enables product designers, 3D artists, marketing professionals and eCommerce site owners to create, customize and publish high-quality 3D models and experiences without any technical or 3D design knowledge required. The Company believes that Toggle3D is the first platform of its kind, and this break-through SaaS product is a potential game changer for the manufacturing and design industry, as it provides a viable solution to convert large CAD files into lightweight 3D models at affordable prices and at scale. According to BIS Research, the CAD market, quantified by the amount spent on the creation of CAD files, is projected to reach $11 Billion dollars by 2023. Learn more: https://toggle3d.com/
the latter will make the spinoff within the first half of this year, increasing the value of Nextech3d.ai shareholders
Map D has become one of the most popular self-serve event management tools as the easiest way to sell your floor space and secure sponsors, deliver a robust companion mobile app for in-person attendees or host entirely in a self-contained virtual venue.
Use Map D to manage any type of event:
In-Person Events
Events are more fun when it’s easier to participate.
During the event, Event Home Base Desktop and Mobile App become companion resources that allow everyone participating to be engaged, personalize their experience, know where they need to be, educate themselves on the presenters and topics, explore the vendor marketplace, and connect with other attendees.
Virtual Events
Eliminate in-person costs, keep sponsor and attendance revenue.
Easily create a fully-contained digital event venue that makes it fun to participate and easy to find the session, speaker, vendor, sponsor, or attendee you're looking for. Live presentations, vendor chat, discussion rooms, and vendor profiles with rich media provide a variety of active and passive engagement opportunities for everyone attending.
Hybrid Events
It's the best of both worlds.
Before the event use Event Home Base to organize information, sell your booth space and sponsorships, promote sponsors, and help your attendees plan their participation. Grow your audience by offering it as both a companion resource for in-person activities and a venue for virtual presentations and activities.
Now let's move on to the recent press releases released by Nextech3d.ai, the parent company
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-continues-to-experience-exponential-sales-growth-in-multi-billion-dollar-3d-modeling-market
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-launches-industry-first-augmented-reality-mobile-app-for-live-events
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-files-patent-for-breakthrough-generative-ai-for-3d-model-creation
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-cad-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-new-machine-learning-and-computer-vision-technology
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextechs-breakthrough-generative-ai-plus-record-3d-model-demand-puts-company-on-track-for-record-q1-record-fy-2023-growth
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-major-tech-upgrade
Arway, a company spun off from nextech3d.ai, which owns 50% of the shares, also continues to gain momentum, as shown in the following press release and partnerships signed in previous releases
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-signs-multiple-new-sdk-deals-for-indoor-positioning-(ipin)-%26-augmented-reality-navigation-%26-augmented-reality-navigation)
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway%E2%80%99s-sdk-gaining-traction-signing-multiple-new-deals-as-%2444-billion-indoor-navigation-industry-accelerates-shift-to-augmented-reality-navigation-
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-lands--ar-navigation-pilot-contract-with-south-america%E2%80%99s-largest-car-rental-company
For more info e DD -> https://www.arway.ai/news-2
I am long term in this company, not trader!
Everyone do their own research, I hope my Dd was interesting

I would like to introduce a company that some may already know, but with high potential. Nextech3D.AI (formally "Nextech AR Solutions Corp" or the "Company") (OTCQX: NEXCF) (CSE: NTAR) (FSE: EP2) is a diversified augmented reality, AI technology company leveraging proprietary artificial intelligence ( AI) to create 3D experiences for the metaverse. Its main activities are the creation of photorealistic WebAR 3D models for the Prime Ecommerce Marketplace and for many other online retailers. The Company develops or acquires what it believes to be disruptive technologies and, once commercialized, transforms them into autonomous public companies that issue a stock dividend to shareholders while retaining a significant ownership stake in the public spin-out. Inside there are several companies that will soon be spun off and made public as was the case for arway last year, returning real value to shareholders given the rise of Arway in just 2 months since its debut.
the companies currently within it are the following:
Nextech Event Solutions (NES) is a cutting-edge event management platform providing industry-leading software to event professionals, special event venues, exhibitors, and commercial entities around the world. Nextech Event Solutions' suite of services enables event executives and planners to seamlessly plan, manage, and deliver exceptional events and immersive event experiences in the estimated $50 billion global meetings and events industry.
To learn more about Nextech Event Solutions (NES), please visit our website: https://www.nextechevents.com
ARitize 3D is your one-stop-shop AR solution with automated 3D model creation at an unbeatable price. Our Artificial Intelligence (AI) will turn your existing 2D product images into high-quality 3D and Augmented Reality experiences. It's fast, it's easy and it will transform your e-commerce website.
With a 3D model, clients can interact with the product to see every detail: turn it, spin it, zoom in, zoom out, leading to 40% lower product returns, 93% higher click-through rate and a 90% reduction in product photography costs. The Company believes that this value creation and ROI are leading to the rapidly growing demand for the Company's 3D technology. Transform your online store into a dynamic virtual showroom. 3D models allow customers to see products from every angle and position them in their own space prior to purchasing. It's an exciting, immersive shopping experience that keeps customers more engaged, and better informed and helps your brand stand out from the competition.
Toggle3D is an AR enhanced standalone web application which enables product designers, 3D artists, marketing professionals and eCommerce site owners to create, customize and publish high-quality 3D models and experiences without any technical or 3D design knowledge required. The Company believes that Toggle3D is the first platform of its kind, and this break-through SaaS product is a potential game changer for the manufacturing and design industry, as it provides a viable solution to convert large CAD files into lightweight 3D models at affordable prices and at scale. According to BIS Research, the CAD market, quantified by the amount spent on the creation of CAD files, is projected to reach $11 Billion dollars by 2023. Learn more: https://toggle3d.com/
the latter will make the spinoff within the first half of this year, increasing the value of Nextech3d.ai shareholders
Map D has become one of the most popular self-serve event management tools as the easiest way to sell your floor space and secure sponsors, deliver a robust companion mobile app for in-person attendees or host entirely in a self-contained virtual venue.
Use Map D to manage any type of event:
In-Person Events
Events are more fun when it’s easier to participate.
During the event, Event Home Base Desktop and Mobile App become companion resources that allow everyone participating to be engaged, personalize their experience, know where they need to be, educate themselves on the presenters and topics, explore the vendor marketplace, and connect with other attendees.
Virtual Events
Eliminate in-person costs, keep sponsor and attendance revenue.
Easily create a fully-contained digital event venue that makes it fun to participate and easy to find the session, speaker, vendor, sponsor, or attendee you're looking for. Live presentations, vendor chat, discussion rooms, and vendor profiles with rich media provide a variety of active and passive engagement opportunities for everyone attending.
Hybrid Events
It's the best of both worlds.
Before the event use Event Home Base to organize information, sell your booth space and sponsorships, promote sponsors, and help your attendees plan their participation. Grow your audience by offering it as both a companion resource for in-person activities and a venue for virtual presentations and activities.
Now let's move on to the recent press releases released by Nextech3d.ai, the parent company
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-continues-to-experience-exponential-sales-growth-in-multi-billion-dollar-3d-modeling-market
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-launches-industry-first-augmented-reality-mobile-app-for-live-events
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-files-patent-for-breakthrough-generative-ai-for-3d-model-creation
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-cad-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-new-machine-learning-and-computer-vision-technology
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextechs-breakthrough-generative-ai-plus-record-3d-model-demand-puts-company-on-track-for-record-q1-record-fy-2023-growth
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-major-tech-upgrade
Arway, a company spun off from nextech3d.ai, which owns 50% of the shares, also continues to gain momentum, as shown in the following press release and partnerships signed in previous releases
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-signs-multiple-new-sdk-deals-for-indoor-positioning-(ipin)-%26-augmented-reality-navigation-%26-augmented-reality-navigation)
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway%E2%80%99s-sdk-gaining-traction-signing-multiple-new-deals-as-%2444-billion-indoor-navigation-industry-accelerates-shift-to-augmented-reality-navigation-
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-lands--ar-navigation-pilot-contract-with-south-america%E2%80%99s-largest-car-rental-company
For more info e DD -> https://www.arway.ai/news-2
I am long term in this company, not trader!
Everyone do their own research, I hope my Dd was interesting

I would like to introduce a company that some may already know, but with high potential. Nextech3D.AI (formally "Nextech AR Solutions Corp" or the "Company") (OTCQX: NEXCF) (CSE: NTAR) (FSE: EP2) is a diversified augmented reality, AI technology company leveraging proprietary artificial intelligence ( AI) to create 3D experiences for the metaverse. Its main activities are the creation of photorealistic WebAR 3D models for the Prime Ecommerce Marketplace and for many other online retailers. The Company develops or acquires what it believes to be disruptive technologies and, once commercialized, transforms them into autonomous public companies that issue a stock dividend to shareholders while retaining a significant ownership stake in the public spin-out. Inside there are several companies that will soon be spun off and made public as was the case for arway last year, returning real value to shareholders given the rise of Arway in just 2 months since its debut.
the companies currently within it are the following:
Nextech Event Solutions (NES) is a cutting-edge event management platform providing industry-leading software to event professionals, special event venues, exhibitors, and commercial entities around the world. Nextech Event Solutions' suite of services enables event executives and planners to seamlessly plan, manage, and deliver exceptional events and immersive event experiences in the estimated $50 billion global meetings and events industry.
To learn more about Nextech Event Solutions (NES), please visit our website: https://www.nextechevents.com
ARitize 3D is your one-stop-shop AR solution with automated 3D model creation at an unbeatable price. Our Artificial Intelligence (AI) will turn your existing 2D product images into high-quality 3D and Augmented Reality experiences. It's fast, it's easy and it will transform your e-commerce website.
With a 3D model, clients can interact with the product to see every detail: turn it, spin it, zoom in, zoom out, leading to 40% lower product returns, 93% higher click-through rate and a 90% reduction in product photography costs. The Company believes that this value creation and ROI are leading to the rapidly growing demand for the Company's 3D technology. Transform your online store into a dynamic virtual showroom. 3D models allow customers to see products from every angle and position them in their own space prior to purchasing. It's an exciting, immersive shopping experience that keeps customers more engaged, and better informed and helps your brand stand out from the competition.
Toggle3D is an AR enhanced standalone web application which enables product designers, 3D artists, marketing professionals and eCommerce site owners to create, customize and publish high-quality 3D models and experiences without any technical or 3D design knowledge required. The Company believes that Toggle3D is the first platform of its kind, and this break-through SaaS product is a potential game changer for the manufacturing and design industry, as it provides a viable solution to convert large CAD files into lightweight 3D models at affordable prices and at scale. According to BIS Research, the CAD market, quantified by the amount spent on the creation of CAD files, is projected to reach $11 Billion dollars by 2023. Learn more: https://toggle3d.com/
the latter will make the spinoff within the first half of this year, increasing the value of Nextech3d.ai shareholders
Map D has become one of the most popular self-serve event management tools as the easiest way to sell your floor space and secure sponsors, deliver a robust companion mobile app for in-person attendees or host entirely in a self-contained virtual venue.
Use Map D to manage any type of event:
In-Person Events
Events are more fun when it’s easier to participate.
During the event, Event Home Base Desktop and Mobile App become companion resources that allow everyone participating to be engaged, personalize their experience, know where they need to be, educate themselves on the presenters and topics, explore the vendor marketplace, and connect with other attendees.
Virtual Events
Eliminate in-person costs, keep sponsor and attendance revenue.
Easily create a fully-contained digital event venue that makes it fun to participate and easy to find the session, speaker, vendor, sponsor, or attendee you're looking for. Live presentations, vendor chat, discussion rooms, and vendor profiles with rich media provide a variety of active and passive engagement opportunities for everyone attending.
Hybrid Events
It's the best of both worlds.
Before the event use Event Home Base to organize information, sell your booth space and sponsorships, promote sponsors, and help your attendees plan their participation. Grow your audience by offering it as both a companion resource for in-person activities and a venue for virtual presentations and activities.
Now let's move on to the recent press releases released by Nextech3d.ai, the parent company
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-continues-to-experience-exponential-sales-growth-in-multi-billion-dollar-3d-modeling-market
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-launches-industry-first-augmented-reality-mobile-app-for-live-events
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-files-patent-for-breakthrough-generative-ai-for-3d-model-creation
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-cad-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-new-machine-learning-and-computer-vision-technology
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextechs-breakthrough-generative-ai-plus-record-3d-model-demand-puts-company-on-track-for-record-q1-record-fy-2023-growth
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-major-tech-upgrade
Arway, a company spun off from nextech3d.ai, which owns 50% of the shares, also continues to gain momentum, as shown in the following press release and partnerships signed in previous releases
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-signs-multiple-new-sdk-deals-for-indoor-positioning-(ipin)-%26-augmented-reality-navigation-%26-augmented-reality-navigation)
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway%E2%80%99s-sdk-gaining-traction-signing-multiple-new-deals-as-%2444-billion-indoor-navigation-industry-accelerates-shift-to-augmented-reality-navigation-
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-lands--ar-navigation-pilot-contract-with-south-america%E2%80%99s-largest-car-rental-company
For more info e DD -> https://www.arway.ai/news-2
I am long term in this company, not trader!
Everyone do their own research, I hope my Dd was interesting
Thank you for appreciation

I would like to introduce a company that some may already know, but with high potential. Nextech3D.AI (formally "Nextech AR Solutions Corp" or the "Company") (OTCQX: NEXCF) (CSE: NTAR) (FSE: EP2) is a diversified augmented reality, AI technology company leveraging proprietary artificial intelligence ( AI) to create 3D experiences for the metaverse. Its main activities are the creation of photorealistic WebAR 3D models for the Prime Ecommerce Marketplace and for many other online retailers. The Company develops or acquires what it believes to be disruptive technologies and, once commercialized, transforms them into autonomous public companies that issue a stock dividend to shareholders while retaining a significant ownership stake in the public spin-out. Inside there are several companies that will soon be spun off and made public as was the case for arway last year, returning real value to shareholders given the rise of Arway in just 2 months since its debut.
the companies currently within it are the following:
Nextech Event Solutions (NES) is a cutting-edge event management platform providing industry-leading software to event professionals, special event venues, exhibitors, and commercial entities around the world. Nextech Event Solutions' suite of services enables event executives and planners to seamlessly plan, manage, and deliver exceptional events and immersive event experiences in the estimated $50 billion global meetings and events industry.
To learn more about Nextech Event Solutions (NES), please visit our website: https://www.nextechevents.com
ARitize 3D is your one-stop-shop AR solution with automated 3D model creation at an unbeatable price. Our Artificial Intelligence (AI) will turn your existing 2D product images into high-quality 3D and Augmented Reality experiences. It's fast, it's easy and it will transform your e-commerce website.
With a 3D model, clients can interact with the product to see every detail: turn it, spin it, zoom in, zoom out, leading to 40% lower product returns, 93% higher click-through rate and a 90% reduction in product photography costs. The Company believes that this value creation and ROI are leading to the rapidly growing demand for the Company's 3D technology. Transform your online store into a dynamic virtual showroom. 3D models allow customers to see products from every angle and position them in their own space prior to purchasing. It's an exciting, immersive shopping experience that keeps customers more engaged, and better informed and helps your brand stand out from the competition.
Toggle3D is an AR enhanced standalone web application which enables product designers, 3D artists, marketing professionals and eCommerce site owners to create, customize and publish high-quality 3D models and experiences without any technical or 3D design knowledge required. The Company believes that Toggle3D is the first platform of its kind, and this break-through SaaS product is a potential game changer for the manufacturing and design industry, as it provides a viable solution to convert large CAD files into lightweight 3D models at affordable prices and at scale. According to BIS Research, the CAD market, quantified by the amount spent on the creation of CAD files, is projected to reach $11 Billion dollars by 2023. Learn more: https://toggle3d.com/
the latter will make the spinoff within the first half of this year, increasing the value of Nextech3d.ai shareholders
Map D has become one of the most popular self-serve event management tools as the easiest way to sell your floor space and secure sponsors, deliver a robust companion mobile app for in-person attendees or host entirely in a self-contained virtual venue.
Use Map D to manage any type of event:
In-Person Events
Events are more fun when it’s easier to participate.
During the event, Event Home Base Desktop and Mobile App become companion resources that allow everyone participating to be engaged, personalize their experience, know where they need to be, educate themselves on the presenters and topics, explore the vendor marketplace, and connect with other attendees.
Virtual Events
Eliminate in-person costs, keep sponsor and attendance revenue.
Easily create a fully-contained digital event venue that makes it fun to participate and easy to find the session, speaker, vendor, sponsor, or attendee you're looking for. Live presentations, vendor chat, discussion rooms, and vendor profiles with rich media provide a variety of active and passive engagement opportunities for everyone attending.
Hybrid Events
It's the best of both worlds.
Before the event use Event Home Base to organize information, sell your booth space and sponsorships, promote sponsors, and help your attendees plan their participation. Grow your audience by offering it as both a companion resource for in-person activities and a venue for virtual presentations and activities.
Now let's move on to the recent press releases released by Nextech3d.ai, the parent company
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-continues-to-experience-exponential-sales-growth-in-multi-billion-dollar-3d-modeling-market
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-launches-industry-first-augmented-reality-mobile-app-for-live-events
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech3d.ai-files-patent-for-breakthrough-generative-ai-for-3d-model-creation
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-cad-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-new-machine-learning-and-computer-vision-technology
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextechs-breakthrough-generative-ai-plus-record-3d-model-demand-puts-company-on-track-for-record-q1-record-fy-2023-growth
https://www.nextechar.com/press-releases-and-media/nextech-ars-ai-powered-3d-design-studio-toggle3d-launches-major-tech-upgrade
Arway, a company spun off from nextech3d.ai, which owns 50% of the shares, also continues to gain momentum, as shown in the following press release and partnerships signed in previous releases
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-signs-multiple-new-sdk-deals-for-indoor-positioning-(ipin)-%26-augmented-reality-navigation-%26-augmented-reality-navigation)
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway%E2%80%99s-sdk-gaining-traction-signing-multiple-new-deals-as-%2444-billion-indoor-navigation-industry-accelerates-shift-to-augmented-reality-navigation-
https://www.arway.ai/news-2/arway-corp.-lands--ar-navigation-pilot-contract-with-south-america%E2%80%99s-largest-car-rental-company
For more info e DD -> https://www.arway.ai/news-2
I am long term in this company, not trader!
Everyone do their own research, I hope my Dd was interesting
Thank you for appreciation

I just ordered an SB20 so I can start using Zwift. I'm out of shape, overweight and in dire need of some exercise.
I was wondering, since cycling outside, carrying more weight is a bad thing. You have to use more energy to accelerate and to keep yourself in motion.
On an exercise bike indoor, you don't have such a thing since you don't have the negative effect of air resistance and so on.
Is this something that Zwift keeps in mind? For example, will the resistance be higher if you are heavier? Normally if you lose weight, you have to spend less energy to get to the same speed but will this same be felt on Zwift?

https://www.xygledscreen.com/
Equipment for LED display control
LED display controller, also known as LED asynchronous control system or LED display control card, is the core component of LED graphic display. It is responsible for receiving the screen display information from the computer serial port, putting it into the frame memory, and generating the serial display data and scan control timing required by the LED display screen according to the partition driving mode.
definition
LED display mainly displays various characters, symbols and graphics. The screen display information is edited by the computer, pre placed into the frame memory of the LED display screen through the RS232 / 485 serial port, and then displayed and played one by one in a circle. The display mode is colorful and can work offline. LED display is widely used in various industries because of its flexible control, convenient operation, high stability and long service life.
classification
Synchronous controller
LED display synchronization controller is mainly used for indoor or outdoor full-color large screen display to display video, text, notification, etc. in real time. The LED display screen synchronization control system controls the working mode of the LED display screen, which is basically the same as the monitor of the computer. It maps the images on the computer monitor in real time at the update rate of at least 60 frames per second. It usually has the color display ability of multi grayscale, which can achieve the effect of multimedia advertising. Its main features are real-time, rich expression, complex operation and high price. A set of LED display synchronization control system is generally composed of a sending card, a receiving card and a DVI display card.
Sending card
Asynchronous controller
LED display asynchronous controller is also called LED display offline control system or offline card. It is mainly used to display various characters, symbols, graphics or animation. The screen display information is edited by the computer, pre placed into the frame memory of the LED display through the RS232 / 485 serial port, and then displayed and played one by one. The display mode is colorful and varied. Its main features are: simple operation, low price, wide range of use. LED display simple asynchronous control system can only display digital clock, text and special characters. In addition to the function of a simple control system, the asynchronous control system for LED display screen graphics and text has the biggest feature that it can control the display screen content in different regions. Support analog clock display, countdown, picture, table and animation display. It has the functions of timing switch, temperature control and humidity control.
component
Synchronous controller
The sending card displays the content to be displayed on the VGA display according to the specific format and certain playing order required by the LED display screen; On the other hand, the picture displayed on the VGA display is sent to the control board through the acquisition card, which is the interface card between the VGA display card and the LED screen.
The receiving card receives the video signal (control signal and data signal) transmitted from the sending card, separates the data in the video signal through the bit plane, stores it in the external buffer by field, and then reads it out by zone and transmits it to the display driving screen.
Asynchronous controller
The display data edited by the computer is stored in the display screen control system in advance, and the normal display of the LED display screen will not be affected after the computer is turned off. Such a control system is an asynchronous control system card.
As a strategic emerging industry of a new economic growth point, the Internet of things has good market benefits. From 2009 when the United States, the European Union, China and other countries proposed the development policy of the Internet of things, the Internet of things has experienced a stage of high-speed development. Traditional enterprises and it giants have laid out the Internet of things one after another. The Internet of things has accelerated its penetration in many fields such as manufacturing, retail, service and public utilities. The Internet of things is on the eve of large-scale explosive growth. In 2015, the global Internet of things market reached 62.4 billion US dollars, with a year-on-year increase of 29%. By 2018, the global Internet of things device market is expected to reach 103.6 billion US dollars, with a compound growth rate of 21% from 2013 to 2018. In 2019, the number of new Internet of things device access will increase from 1.691 billion in 2015 to 3.054 billion.
It can be seen that the current development of the "Internet of things" in China is in full swing, and more and more goods and devices will be connected to the Internet of things in the future. Under this background, our LED display industry is naturally not willing to lag behind, and now some led enterprises have begun to plan.
Therefore, as the most critical "brain" of LED display, the control system naturally plays the role of "pacesetter".

Howdy Partner ya looking mighty nice today.
So a lot of people wanted my review on both phases so here it is:
Books Ranked
15: Kingdom of the Wicked
14: Ressurection
13: Skulduggery Pleasant
12: Mortal Coil
11: The Faceless Ones
10: Bedlam
9: Playing with Fire
8: Midnight
7: Until the End
6: Dead or Alive
5: The Dying of the Light
4: Death Bringer
3: Seasons of War
2: Dark Days
1: Last Stand of Dead Men
The Top 3 were really hard to pick between and it could've gone either way. And some of you may notice the shift between the rankings of Mortal Coil and Kingdom of the Wicked.
Apart from Kingdom of the Wicked, I would give most of these books a 7/10 at least.
Top 10 characters
10: Omen Darkly
9: Nefarian Serpine
8: Tesseract
7: Erskine Ravel (I hate him but he's a greatly written character F_ckRavel )
6: Anton Shudder
5: Ghastly Bespoke
4: The Plauge Doctor
3: Valkryie Cain
2: Skulduggery Pleasant
1: Saracen Rue WhyisSaracenRuesoSexy
Yes, u/MalteseFarrell I mentioned Tesseract.
I had a hard time picking characters from the entire series but this is what I ended up going with.
Top 10 Villains
10: Damocles Creed
9: Abyssinia
8: Lethe
7: Cadaverous Gant
6: Mevolent
5: Lord Vile
4: Erskine Ravel
3: Nefarian Serpine
2: Darquesse
1: Dreylan Scarab
Scarab is still sitting on top. But these villains were the ones that made me the most invested in the story.
Best moments from each book
Skulduggery Pleasant: Valkryie picks her name to save Skulduggery
Playing with Fire: Grotesquery awakens
The Faceless Ones: The Faceless Ones come back
Dark Days: Scarab's talk with Guild at Croke Park
Mortal Coil: Tesseract escapes and kills the Torment
Death Bringer: Skulduggery transforms into Lord Vile to fight Melancholia
Kingdom of the Wicked: Valkryie punches Kitana in the face
Last Stand of Dead Men: Tales from the Dead Men
The Dying of the Light: Skulduggery gives Ravels soul to the Accelerator
Resurrection: Lethe is revealed as Savant Vega
Midnight: Cadaverous's 'Lets save Alice' entry speech
Bedlam: Dusk reveals Valkryie's true ancestors
Seasons of War: Vile Vs Vile
Dead or Alive: Coda Quell assassinates Damocles Creed
Until the End: "Hi, Ghastly"
That was really hard to look back and remember. But all of these moments made me either go "YESSS" or "God Damn!".
Top 10 Saddest Deaths
10: Melancholia St. Clair
9: Solomon Wreath
8: Echo Gordon
7: Temper Fray
6: Kenspeckle Grouse
5: Tesseract
4: Billy-Ray Sanguine
3: Anton Shudder
2: Ghastly Bespoke
1: Saracen Rue
An alternative,
Happiest Deaths in the Series
1: Erskine Ravel
Yay! F_ckRavel
Seriously though, some of these deaths almost made me cry.
That's it. If there's any ranking I've forgotten, let me know.
Also, I've been thinking about doing my ideas for Phase 3, just like u/VesuviusBlotch did. Although to do this, I'm gonna need a question answered. At the end of UtE, does Temper still have the Gist controlling him?
I already have one of the titles in mind. How does 'Gist and Ghost' sound?
Also, from 7:00 on Friday evening, (in Ireland time) to 12:00 on Sunday I will not be able to answer you questions now, as I am going indoor camping. So if you wonder why I haven't responded, that's why.
But with that said, Good Riddance and Stay Safe. Have a Good Day.

Find below some key emerging technologies.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
AI refers to the ability of machines or computers to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and language translation. AI is achieved through the development of algorithms and computer programs that enable machines to learn from data and make decisions based on that data. These algorithms are designed to simulate cognitive functions such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving, and can be used in a wide variety of applications, including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, transportation, and entertainment.
You can watch Videos about AI Innovations here.
​
3D Printing
3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is a process of creating three-dimensional objects from a digital file by layering materials on top of each other. The process typically involves creating a digital 3D model of the object using computer-aided design (CAD) software, then using a 3D printer to create the physical object. The 3D printing process can use a variety of materials, including plastics, metals, ceramics, and even living cells. The type of material used depends on the desired properties of the final object, such as strength, flexibility, or conductivity.
Watch Videos from this playlist list to know about research and innovations related to 3D printing.
Brain–computer interface
A brain-computer interface (BCI), also known as a brain-machine interface (BMI), is a technology that enables communication between the brain and a computer or other external device. The goal of a BCI is to allow individuals to control devices or communicate without the need for traditional input methods such as a keyboard or mouse. BCIs work by detecting and interpreting brain activity, usually through the use of electroencephalography (EEG) sensors placed on the scalp or directly on the brain. The brain signals are then processed and translated into commands that can be used to control external devices, such as prosthetic limbs or computers.
Watch below some BCI-related innovations and research.
Researchers take step toward next-generation brain-computer interface system Neurograins
Brain-Computer Interface allows Fast, Accurate Typing by people with Paralysis
Brain-computer interface turning thoughts into action appears safe in Clinical trials BrainGate
This 'Brain-to-Text' system can turn your Thoughts into Text
New tool activates deep brain neurons by combining ultrasound, genetics Sonothermogenetics
New sensor grids record human brain signals in record-breaking resolution
Wearable Brain-Machine Interface Could Control a Wheelchair, Vehicle or Computer
Brain-Computer Interface enables paralyzed man to walk
Wirelessly Rechargeable Soft Brain Implant Controls Brain Cells​
Brain-implanted chips convert paralyzed man’s thoughts into words Mindwriting
“Neuroprosthesis” Restores Words to Man with Paralysis
Using a Walking Avatar to Treat Gait Disabilities
Controlling Robots with Brainwaves and Hand Gestures
Third Arm for Multitasking. Your Brain will control Third Arm too
Brain-Powered Wheelchair Shows Real-World Promise
Nanomedicine
Nanomedicine is a field of medicine that involves the use of nanotechnology, which is the engineering of materials and devices on a nanometer scale, to diagnose, treat, and prevent disease. .
Watch below some news videos related to nanomedicine.
Engineers develop nanoparticles that cross the blood-brain barrier to treat glioblastoma
Novel nanotech improves cystic fibrosis antibiotic by 100,000-fold
EPFL's New Remote-Controlled Microrobots for Medical Operations
Nanotherapy offers new hope for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes
Studied for Clean Energy, Carbon Nanotubes find new potential in Anticancer Drug Delivery
Bacteria-based biohybrid microrobots on a mission to one day battle cancer
Laser printing with nanoparticles holds promise for medical research
Nanosensors
Nanosensors are small-scale devices that can detect and respond to changes in their environment at the nanoscale level. They are used in a wide range of applications, including medicine, environmental monitoring, and electronics. The most common types of nanosensors include those that rely on changes in electrical properties, optical properties, and chemical properties.
Find below some videos about nanosensors.
Nanosensor can alert a smartphone when plants are stressed
Nano-sensor detects pesticides on fruit in minutes
Plant-based sensor to monitor arsenic levels in soil Plant Nanobionic Sensors
MIT engineers boost signals from fluorescent sensors for cancer diagnosis or monitoring
Self-Healing materials
Self-healing materials are a class of materials that have the ability to repair damage or defects that occur over time, without the need for human intervention. These materials can be made from a variety of substances, including polymers, metals, ceramics, and composites. There are several ways in which self-healing materials can function. Some materials have the ability to repair themselves through chemical reactions when they come into contact with a particular stimulus, such as heat or light. Others contain microcapsules filled with healing agents that are released when the material is damaged. Still, others use networks of fibers or polymers that can re-form after being broken.
Self-healing materials for robotics made from ‘jelly’ and salt
Self-healing composites extend a product's lifespan
Soft robot detects damage and heals itself
Quantum dot
Quantum dots are tiny particles made up of semiconductor materials that are only a few nanometers in size. They have unique electronic and optical properties that make them useful in a wide range of applications, including electronics, biomedicine, and energy. The size of a quantum dot is so small that it causes quantum confinement of electrons, which gives them unique optical and electrical properties. Specifically, quantum dots exhibit fluorescence, meaning they can absorb and emit light at specific wavelengths, which can be tuned by changing the size of the particle. This property makes quantum dots useful in applications such as medical imaging and LED displays.
Quantum-Dot Spectrometer that can fit inside a Smartphone Camera
Use of perovskite will be a key feature of future electronic appliances Perovskite Quantum Dots
Storing medical information below the skin’s surface
Three dimensional foldable quantum dot light emitting diodes 3D foldable QLEDs
Researchers Develop Faster, Precise Silica Coating Process for Quantum Dot Nanorods
Carbon nanotubes
Carbon nanotubes are cylindrical structures made up of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice. They have unique electronic, mechanical, and thermal properties that make them useful in a wide range of applications, including electronics, materials science, and biomedicine. Carbon nanotubes are incredibly strong and stiff, with a tensile strength many times that of steel. They are also highly conductive, which makes them useful in electronics and energy storage.
Smarter Textiles using Carbon nanotubes
Carbon nanotube film produces airplane with no need for huge ovens or autoclaves
Carbon nanotubes could help electronics withstand outer space’s harsh conditions
Carbon Nanotubes help to recyle waste heat by converting into Light
Carbon Nanotube for "unconventional" Computing
Metamaterials
Metamaterials are artificially engineered materials that have properties not found in natural materials. They are made up of specially designed structures that manipulate electromagnetic waves, sound waves, and other types of waves in ways that are not possible with natural materials. One of the most common types of metamaterials is known as a negative index material, which has a negative refractive index. This means that it can bend light in the opposite direction of conventional materials. Negative index materials have the potential to create lenses that can focus light to a resolution much smaller than the wavelength of the light, which could have implications for high-resolution imaging and communication technologies.
Researchers Design 3D Kirigami Building Blocks to Make Dynamic Metamaterials
Scientists created Crispier Chocolate using 3D Printers Edible Metamaterials
Gold-based passive heating for eyewear Transparent sunlight-activated antifogging metamaterials
Microfluidics
Microfluidics is a field of research that deals with the behavior, control, and manipulation of fluids and particles at the microscale level, typically in the range of micrometers to millimeters. Microfluidic devices are characterized by their small size and the ability to precisely control fluid flows and transport, making them useful for a wide range of applications, including biomedical analysis, chemical synthesis, and environmental monitoring. Microfluidic devices typically use channels and chambers etched or fabricated on a chip, which can be made from materials such as glass, silicon, or polymers. These channels and chambers can be designed to carry out specific tasks, such as mixing and separating fluids, performing chemical reactions, or analyzing biological samples. Microfluidics has the potential to revolutionize a number of fields, including medical diagnostics, drug development, and environmental monitoring, by enabling more precise and efficient manipulation of fluids and particles at a smaller scale than is possible with traditional techniques.
New microfluidic technique for doing Blood Analysis easily
MIT's Microfluidic Device distinguishes Cells based on how they respond to Acoustic Vibrations
MIT's Microfluidics device helps diagnose sepsis in minutes
MIT's Modular Microfluidics from LEGO bricks
MIT's new Microfluidic Device may speed up DNA insertion in Bacteria
​
High-temperature superconductivity
High-temperature superconductivity (HTS) refers to the phenomenon of materials exhibiting zero electrical resistance at temperatures higher than the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (-196°C). This is in contrast to traditional superconductors, which typically require temperatures close to absolute zero (-273°C) to exhibit zero electrical resistance. The discovery of high-temperature superconductivity in the 1980s sparked great interest in the scientific community due to its potential for practical applications, such as more efficient electrical transmission and energy storage. However, the mechanism behind high-temperature superconductivity is not yet fully understood, and research in this field is ongoing.
Newly discovered material property may lead to high temp superconductivity
“Magic-angle” trilayer graphene may be a rare, magnet-proof superconductor
Physicists discover a “family” of robust, superconducting graphene structures
​
Graphene
Graphene is a two-dimensional material composed of a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice. It is the basic building block of other carbon-based materials such as graphite, carbon nanotubes, and fullerenes. Graphene has attracted considerable attention due to its unique electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties. It is one of the strongest materials known, with a tensile strength more than 100 times greater than steel. It also has high electrical conductivity and mobility, as well as high thermal conductivity. The unique properties of graphene make it attractive for a wide range of applications, including electronics, energy storage, sensors, and biomedical devices.
Watch a lot of videos about Graphene innovations, research, and news on this playlist.
​
Bioplastic
Bioplastics are a type of plastic that are made from renewable biomass sources, such as vegetable fats and oils, cornstarch, and pea starch, instead of fossil fuels. Bioplastics can be produced using various methods, including fermentation, chemical synthesis, and enzymatic catalysis.
Turning Wood Into Plastic Lignocellulosic Bioplastic
Scientists developed an integrated system that uses carbon dioxide to produce bioplastics
Embedded Polymer-Eating Enzymes Make “Biodegradable” Plastics Truly Compostable
Making cleaner, greener plastics from waste fish parts
Aerogel
Aerogel is a synthetic porous material that is composed of a gel in which the liquid component has been replaced with gas, resulting in a solid material that is almost entirely made up of air. Aerogels can be made from various materials, including silica, carbon, and metal oxides, and they are known for their low density, high surface area, and exceptional thermal insulation properties. Aerogels are some of the lightest materials known, with densities ranging from about 0.001 to 0.5 g/cm³. They also have high surface areas, which can range from 100 to 1000 square meters per gram, making them attractive for applications in catalysis, sensors, and energy storage. Aerogels are also excellent insulators, with thermal conductivities that are typically one or two orders of magnitude lower than those of other insulating materials. Aerogels have a wide range of applications, including in aerospace, energy, construction, and environmental remediation.
Aerogel – the micro structural material of the future
MIT's Gel layer inspired by Camel Fur keeps Food and Medicines Cool without Electricity
Reduced Heat Leakage Improves Wearable Health Device
Vertical farming
Vertical farming is a method of growing crops in vertically stacked layers or shelves, using artificial lighting, controlled temperature and humidity, and precise nutrient delivery systems. This method of farming can be used in both urban and rural settings and is becoming increasingly popular due to its potential to increase crop yield, reduce water usage, and minimize environmental impact. Vertical farming can take many forms, including indoor farms, greenhouses, and shipping container farms.
Bowery Farming requires 95% less Water, uses No pesticides and 100 times more Productive
Tinted solar panels could boost farm incomes
Cultured meat
Cultured meat, also known as lab-grown meat or cell-based meat, is a type of meat that is produced by growing animal cells in a lab instead of raising and slaughtering animals. Cultured meat is made by taking a small sample of animal cells, such as muscle cells, and then using biotechnology to replicate those cells and grow them into muscle tissue. Cultured meat has the potential to offer a more sustainable and ethical alternative to traditional meat production.
Meeting the meat needs of the future Millimetre-thick cultured steak
Computer models help to reduce cost of Lab-cultured meat
Lab-Grown Meat Prices are coming down
Flexible electronics
Flexible electronics refers to electronic devices and circuits that can be bent, twisted, or stretched without breaking or losing their functionality. Unlike traditional rigid electronics, which are made from materials like silicon that are brittle and inflexible, flexible electronics are made from a range of materials that are designed to be more flexible and durable. Flexible electronics have many potential applications, ranging from wearable health monitors and smart clothing to foldable smartphones and flexible displays.
Printing flexible wearable electronics for smart device applications
Flexible Wearable Electronic Skin Patch offers new way to monitor Alcohol levels
Engineers fabricate a chip-free, wireless electronic “skin”
Printed electronics open way for electrified tattoos and personalized biosensors
Researchers Print Electronic Memory On Paper
3D-printed CurveBoards enable easier testing of circuit design on electronics products
New wearable device turns the body into a battery Wearable Thermoelectric generator (TEG)
Li-Fi
Li-Fi, which stands for "Light Fidelity," is a wireless communication technology that uses light to transmit data. Li-Fi works by modulating the light emitted by LED lamps or other light sources, using variations in intensity that are too fast to be detected by the human eye. These variations can be used to transmit data, similar to how radio waves are used in traditional Wi-Fi. One of the main advantages of Li-Fi is its potential for very high-speed data transmission.
Li-Fi is 100 times Faster than wi-fi. Light Bulbs could be used for delivering Data
Faster LEDs for Wireless Communications from Invisible Light
Machine vision
Machine vision, also known as computer vision, is a field of artificial intelligence that focuses on enabling computers to interpret and understand visual information from the world around them. Machine vision uses various techniques and algorithms to analyze digital images and video in order to recognize objects, detect patterns, and extract useful information. Machine vision has a wide range of applications, including industrial automation, surveillance and security, medical imaging, and autonomous vehicles.
AI learns to predict human behavior from videos
Deep learning to enable color vision in the dark Night Vision by combining AI and IR Camera
A simpler path to better computer vision
A robot that senses hidden objects
Using artificial intelligence to control digital manufacturing
Scientists built a Bionic Eye with better vision than humans
Memristor
A memristor is a two-terminal electronic device that can change its resistance based on the history of the electrical signals that have been applied to it. In other words, it "remembers" the electrical state it was in the last time it was used. The memristor was first theorized in 1971 by Leon Chua, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley. However, it wasn't until 2008 that the first practical memristor was developed by a team of researchers at HP Labs. Memristors have several potential applications in electronics, including as a replacement for traditional storage devices such as hard drives and flash memory. Memristors have the potential to be faster, more energy-efficient, and more durable than traditional storage devices, and they may also be able to store more data in a smaller physical space.
World's smallest atom-memory unit created Smallest memristor Atomristor
Brain-on-a-chip Engineers put tens of thousands of artificial brain synapses on a single chip
Graphene-based memory resistors show promise for brain-based computing
Neuromorphic computing
Neuromorphic computing is a field of computer engineering that aims to design computer systems that mimic the behavior of the human brain. This type of computing is based on the principles of neuroscience and seeks to create systems that can process and analyze large amounts of data in a way that is more similar to the way the human brain works.
One of the key features of neuromorphic computing is the use of artificial neural networks. These networks are composed of interconnected nodes that are modeled after the neurons found in the human brain. Each node, or artificial neuron, is capable of processing information and communicating with other nodes through a series of electrical signals.
Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing
Superconductivity switches on and off in “magic-angle” graphene Neuromorphic computing
AI system CAMEO discovers new material GST467 useful for neuromorphic computers
Brain-on-a-chip Engineers put tens of thousands of artificial brain synapses on a single chip
Quantum computing
Quantum computing is a field of computing that utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to perform operations and solve problems that are difficult or impossible for classical computers to handle. Unlike classical computers, which use bits to represent data and perform calculations, quantum computers use quantum bits or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously. One of the key advantages of quantum computing is its ability to perform calculations at a much faster rate than classical computers. This is because quantum computers can perform many calculations simultaneously, thanks to the principle of superposition, which allows qubits to exist in multiple states at once. Additionally, quantum computers can use a technique called entanglement, which allows multiple qubits to be linked together in such a way that the state of one qubit is dependent on the state of the other. Quantum computing has many potential applications, including in the fields of cryptography, optimization, and machine learning.
Physicists observe wormhole dynamics using a quantum computer
Scientists create Time Crystals with quantum computers using Google's Sycamore chip
A new way for quantum computing systems to keep their cool
Researchers confront major hurdle in quantum computing
Tiny Quantum Computer solves real optimisation problem
Google opens Quantum AI campus to work on creating commercial quantum computer
Error-free quantum computing gets real Fault-tolerant quantum computer
Quantum Processor does 9,000 Years of Work in 36 Microseconds
IBM Quantum Experience allows anyone to access IBM's Quantum Computer over the Web
Novel thermometer can accelerate quantum computer development
Twist - MIT's new programming language for quantum computing
Running quantum software on a classical computer
New quantum computing architecture could be used to connect large-scale devices
Silq is the first intuitive programming language for Quantum Computers
Spintronics
Spintronics, also known as spin electronics, is a field of study in electronics and physics that aims to exploit the spin of electrons for use in electronic devices. Unlike conventional electronics, which rely on the charge of electrons to encode information, spintronics uses the intrinsic spin of electrons to store and manipulate data. In spintronics, the spin of electrons is used to represent binary information, with up-spin electrons representing a "1" and down-spin electrons representing a "0". This allows for the creation of non-volatile, low-power memory devices that do not rely on the constant flow of electric current to maintain their state. Spintronics has the potential to revolutionize the electronics industry by enabling the creation of faster, smaller, and more energy-efficient devices.
New nanoscale device for spin technology A step towards using Spintronics to make computer chips
MIT offers path to “spintronic” devices for efficient computing, with magnetic waves
Speech recognition
Speech recognition is a technology that enables computers or devices to recognize and interpret spoken language. It uses algorithms and machine learning techniques to convert human speech into digital signals that can be understood by a computer. Speech recognition is used in a wide range of applications, from voice assistants like Siri and Alexa to automated customer service systems, medical transcriptions, and language translation. It is particularly useful for individuals who have difficulty typing, such as those with physical disabilities or those who need to transcribe large amounts of audio.
Sundar Pichai teases AR glasses that can translate speech in real time
DolphinAttack Can Take Control of Siri and Alexa with Inaudible Voice Command
Twistronics
Twistronics is a field of study in materials science and physics that involves manipulating the twist angle between two layers of two-dimensional materials, such as graphene or transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). By changing the angle at which these layers are stacked, it is possible to alter the electronic properties of the materials in a precise and controllable way. The term "twistronics" was first introduced in a 2018 paper by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), who demonstrated that by adjusting the twist angle between two layers of graphene, they could create a new type of superconductor that exhibits unique electronic properties.
Graphene Twistronics - MIT researchers map tiny twists in “magic-angle” graphene
MIT turns "magic" material (magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene) into versatile electronic devices
Three-dimensional integrated circuit
A three-dimensional integrated circuit (3D IC) is a type of integrated circuit (IC) that involves stacking multiple layers of electronic components, such as transistors and memory cells, on top of one another to create a three-dimensional structure. This approach allows for a greater number of components to be packed into a smaller space, resulting in faster and more efficient circuits. In a traditional two-dimensional IC, the components are arranged side by side on a single plane. However, as the number of components in an IC increases, the size of the chip can become a limiting factor, as the distances between components must be large enough to avoid interference and crosstalk. By stacking components vertically in a 3D IC, the distances between components can be reduced, allowing for faster communication and reduced power consumption.
3-D Chip combines Computing and Data Storage
Spiraling Circuits for More Efficient AI
Virtual reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR)
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are two related but distinct technologies that have become increasingly popular in recent years. Both involve the use of computer-generated content to create immersive experiences, but they differ in terms of how that content is presented and how users interact with it.
Watch many videos related to VR and AR from this playlist.
Holography
Holography is a technique used to create three-dimensional images or holograms using lasers. Unlike traditional photographs or images, which are two-dimensional representations of objects or scenes, holograms capture and reproduce the full three-dimensional information of an object or scene. This creates a highly realistic and immersive visual experience that is often compared to the actual object or scene being depicted.
Using artificial intelligence to generate 3D holograms in real-time Tensor Holography
Hologram experts can now create real-life images that move in the air
New printer "CHIMERA" creates extremely realistic colorful holograms
Holograms increase solar energy yield
3D Hologram generation without GPU, for next-gen AR devices
Real "doodles of light" in real-time mark leap for holograms at home
3D holographic head-up display could improve road safety
​
Artificial photosynthesis
Artificial photosynthesis is a process that mimics the natural process of photosynthesis, which is the process by which plants and other organisms convert sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide into energy-rich organic compounds such as sugars. Artificial photosynthesis aims to create a similar process using man-made materials and techniques in order to produce renewable fuels and other useful chemicals. The basic principle of artificial photosynthesis is to use a catalyst to split water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen. The hydrogen can then be used as a fuel or combined with carbon dioxide to produce hydrocarbons or other chemicals.
Artificial photosynthesis uses sunlight to make biodegradable plastic
Artificial photosynthesis devices that improve themselves with use
‘Green methane’ from artificial photosynthesis could recycle CO2
MIT's new model could help scientists design materials for artificial photosynthesis
Artificial Leaf Solar Cell: Breakthrough Solar Cell captures CO2 and Sunlight, produces Fuel
Fusion power
Fusion power is a form of energy that is generated by nuclear fusion, which is the process by which two atomic nuclei come together to form a heavier nucleus, releasing energy in the process. Fusion power has the potential to provide a virtually limitless source of clean and sustainable energy. The basic principle of fusion power is to use the energy released by nuclear fusion to generate heat, which can then be used to produce electricity. To achieve this, researchers are exploring a variety of different methods for achieving controlled nuclear fusion reactions, including magnetic confinement, inertial confinement, and laser-induced fusion. One of the main advantages of fusion power is its potential to provide a virtually unlimited source of energy.
MIT's simple ARC Reactor will make Nuclear Fusion power plants Real in few years
EPFL and DeepMind use AI to control plasmas for nuclear fusion
Machine learning facilitates “turbulence tracking” in fusion reactors
Gravity battery
A gravity battery is a type of energy storage system that uses gravity to store and release energy. It works by raising and lowering heavy objects, such as large masses of concrete or steel, in order to store or release potential energy. The basic principle of a gravity battery is to raise a heavy object to a high position, such as the top of a tower or building, in order to store potential energy. When energy is needed, the object is allowed to fall or descend, converting the potential energy into kinetic energy which can then be harnessed and converted into electricity.
Turning abandoned mines into batteries
​
Artificial uterus
An artificial uterus, also known as an artificial womb, is a hypothetical device that could potentially be used to support the growth and development of a fetus outside of the mother's body. The idea behind an artificial uterus is to provide a safe and controlled environment for fetuses that cannot develop normally in the mother's womb due to various medical conditions or complications. The concept of an artificial uterus has been explored in science fiction for many years, but it is still largely a theoretical idea in the realm of science and medicine. However, there have been some experimental studies using animal models to investigate the feasibility of developing an artificial uterus.
Artificial womb facility concept EctoLife
Self-driving car
A self-driving car, also known as an autonomous car, is a vehicle that is capable of sensing its environment and operating without human input. Self-driving cars use a variety of sensors, including cameras, radar, and lidar, to detect their surroundings and make decisions about how to navigate through them.
Computers that power self-driving cars could be a huge driver of global carbon emissions
MIT's new system allows self-driving cars to navigate in Snow
MIT's MapLite allows Self-driving Cars to Navigate Rural Roads Without a Map
Autonomous vehicles can be tricked into dangerous driving behavior
A new machine-learning system M2I may someday help driverless cars predict the next moves of others
Watch more topics at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvSVvk9n-yw