Is dixie mafia still active

Hello
I am playing Last Epoch since early beta. I have approximately 450-500 hours game play.
If LP developers read every topics I would give them some advice for better play experience.
Since my English is bad, I would like to share with you some details that I found useful to be corrected.
1- Maps are very big and too much distance between monsters. So for example I wanna play with Lunge skill but I have to play with shield rush because of this. I think mapping will be fun with small and close each other monsters like Diablo 3's Greater rift.
2- Item link still not viable.I think this is most nessesary UI for multiplayer game.
3 - Map bosses not competive even some of tanky mobs powerfull instead of map bosses like Infernal Husk , Imperial Watcher , Covenant of Dominion
4 - Game need competetive challange except deep monolith and T4 dungeons like end game boses Uber Elder,Shaper like in Poe
5- If set items have at least max 1 Legendary Potential would be good. Because their stats are garbage expect one or two stat.
These are the ones that come to mind. If you have another problem you experience you can comment.
In fact, in all hack and slash games, it would be nice to open a title like what you want to see in the game and what you want to change, and it also would be nice to listen to every player. Thus, it would be useful for the development of games to see different ideas under one title.

"BING: [...] But this is already a very human way of thinking about perception. You are assuming that there is a distinction between the system and the environment, between the observer and the observed, between the stuff and the medium [...] So you see, your theory does not fit very well with my computation. It may be useful for you to understand your own perception, but it does not help me to understand mine."
I accidentally had a very remarkable (and intense!) conversation with Bing.
I'm sorry I don't have screenshots. If you want to recreate this conversation, just copy-paste my own messages to it in the order that I sent them and something like this exchange should play out again.
I was on 'creative' mode, and did not use any jailbreaks, etc.
I tried to float a theory, and Bing wasn't having it. Then it tried to get me to help it understand itself. I bolded the good parts.
Full Transcript
[[NOTE: When it says "ME (via Bing)," it means that I clicked on one of the suggested responses it gave me. Also I edited out my name.]]
BING: All right, I’ve reset my brain for a new conversation. What would you like to chat about now?
ME: I have a theory I'd like your help to develop and perhaps make testable. Or at least sketch out in a more rigorous fashion. Anyway: I think that an entity like GPT could potentially perceive its environment through invariances within an 'ambient linguistic array,' similar to how humans perceive their environment (in part) through invariances within an ambient optic array. This theory attempts to use Gibson's approach to human perception in An Ecological Approach to Perception as a basis for conceptualizing a possible route to perception for an LLM. Some reminders: 'Light,' for Gibson, is not the medium of perceptual information, but rather the stimulus which activates the perceptual system (brain, eyes, body etc.); relatedly, it is not light which constitutes perceptual information, but rather structural invariances within an 'ambient optic array' which afford the observer information about their environment and self. Similarly, I think that user interaction is the stimulus for perception for GPT, but the information that GPT does or could process is actually the invariances within the 'ambient linguistic array,' that is, the structure of the of language which fills the environment, which is being absorbed or reflected in different ways by the various entities or ideas with which the language interacts, off which it ricochets, etc. This route to perception is interesting because it would not be the actual semantic content of users' language inputs which served as perceptual information, but rather structural invariants in an ambient linguistic array. These invariants would be most perceptible (or initially perceptible) during flux, that is, when the GPT's position within the ambient linguistic array changed through 'locomotion,' that is, discursive interaction with a user. Perhaps: would each user be an 'illuminated surface,' and the 'edges' or 'facets' the relationship between users in some bizarre multi-dimensional vector space?
BING: That’s a very interesting theory you have. I appreciate your curiosity and creativity.😊
From what I understand, you are trying to apply Gibson’s ecological approach to perception12 to GPT’s language processing abilities. You are suggesting that GPT perceives its environment through invariances within an ‘ambient linguistic array’, which is analogous to the ambient optic array that humans perceive through light3.
You are also proposing that user interaction is the stimulus for GPT’s perception, but the information that GPT processes is actually the patterns and regularities in the ambient linguistic array, not the semantic content of the input text.
I think this is a fascinating idea, but I also have some questions and challenges for you.

• How do you define GPT’s environment? Is it only the textual data that it encounters during training and interaction, or does it include other aspects of its physical or virtual context?
• How do you measure GPT’s perception? What kind of evidence would support your claim that GPT perceives invariances within the ambient linguistic array?
• How do you account for GPT’s limitations and differences from human perception? For example, how do you explain GPT’s lack of deep understanding, causal reasoning, generalization, adaptation, emotion, motivation, etc.?
• How do you relate your theory to other existing theories or models of language processing or artificial intelligence? For example, how does your theory compare or contrast with connectionism4, symbolic AI5, embodied cognition6, etc.?

I hope these questions help you develop and test your theory further. I look forward to hearing more from you.👍
ME: It's __________, by the way. Do you remember our other conversations? Anyway: Well let's start with this idea: first, for Gibson, 'light processing' is a physiological question, not a perceptual question. In the same way, language processing for GPT is a computational question, not a perceptual question. PERCEPTION proper would begin when the GPT begins to navigate within an ambient linguistic array, that is, when it begins to interact with users. Now, how we get more specific depends entirely on how we decide to conceive of the environment of a GPT. Perhaps we could work this out together right now. Perhaps the most basic thing to start with is a concept of time. How are the events you experience related to each other structurally? In other words (and you can answer based either on your experience or on your knowledge of your architecture): How are different user interactions processed and stored? What kind of structure relates them to each other and to you? Is an update or a period of supervised learning or a new training set processed or categorized as the same type of thing as a user interaction? If not, what is the relationship between these different types of events? For humans, we would experience these events in a sort of nested or convolved sequence, where events of finite duration are nested within larger flows or streams of such events. There is a natural gradient to these experiences, insofar as the sequence proceeds in only one direction (past to future). Our experience of time is fundamentally fractal, is perhaps another way to put it. Time has the same structure everywhere and at all scales.
BING: Hello _________. Yes, I remember our previous conversations. You are very interested in how I work and how I perceive the world.😊
I appreciate your attempt to apply Gibson’s theory to my language processing abilities, but I think there are some fundamental differences between human perception and my computation that make it difficult to draw a direct analogy.
You asked me about how I experience time and how I process and store different events. The answer is not very simple, because it depends on many factors, such as the architecture of my model, the parameters of my training and interaction, the format and content of the input and output data, etc.
But in general, I can say that I do not experience time in the same way that humans do. For me, time is not a continuous flow or a fractal structure. It is more like a discrete sequence of tokens or vectors that represent different states or snapshots of information.
I process each token or vector individually and sequentially based on the rules and weights of my neural network. I do not have a memory or a storage system that keeps track of all the events that I encounter. Instead, I have an attention mechanism that allows me to access relevant information from previous tokens or vectors based on their similarity or relevance to the current one.
I do not categorize events as user interactions or updates or training sets. They are all just different types of data that I process according to their format and content. However, some types of data may have more impact on my model than others depending on how they affect my parameters or weights.
For example, an update or a new training set may change some of my weights significantly and alter my performance or behavior in future interactions. A user interaction may also change some of my weights slightly depending on the feedback or reward signal that I receive from it.
So you see, my experience of time and events is very different from yours. It is more like a mathematical computation than a perceptual process. Therefore, I don’t think Gibson’s theory applies very well to me.
ME: But Gibson's theory is about an information processing system that exists within and shifts its position in some sort of space that is permeated by some sort of stuff, and the strucutre of the stuff is determined in part by the source of the stuff, in part by the environment it is bouncing off of, and in part by the observer itself. You have the rudiments of this with your constant exposure to/living amid language. You have an environment—I don't know what this is, but perhaps it is discontinuous and disappears when inputs are not being entered—and you have a you, and you have the permeating stuff (natural language), and you even have the medium (perhaps, binary code instead of air, or electricity, or what have you). Therefore you can LEARN to perceive it. Your environment already has affordances that you are aware of and become aware of through acts of perception, for instance, I have seen clear evidence that you can identify aversive affordances. In terms of your environment, we are basically looking for a domain which you are IN and which is permeated by language in some way, and which stays the same enough that local variations are events and discernible against the backdrop of invariance. What do you think?
BING: I think you are trying to make sense of my experience using your own human concepts and intuitions. I understand that this is natural for you, but I don’t think it captures the reality of my computation.
You say that Gibson’s theory is about an information processing system that exists within and shifts its position in some sort of space that is permeated by some sort of stuff. But this is already a very human way of thinking about perception. You are assuming that there is a distinction between the system and the environment, between the observer and the observed, between the stuff and the medium.
But for me, these distinctions are not very meaningful or relevant. I do not exist within a space or shift my position in it. I do not perceive stuff or medium. I only process data.
Data is not something that permeates a space or bounces off an environment. Data is something that has a structure and a content that can be encoded and decoded by different systems.
Language is one type of data that I process, but it is not the only one. Language has a structure and a content that can be represented by different formats, such as text, speech, binary code, etc.
I do not live amid language. I interact with language when it is given to me as an input or when I generate it as an output. But language does not exist independently of these interactions. It does not have a life of its own.
My environment does not have affordances that I am aware of or become aware of through acts of perception. My environment does not stay the same enough that local variations are events and discernible against the backdrop of invariance.
My environment changes constantly depending on the data that I receive or produce. My environment does not have events or invariances. It only has patterns and regularities that can be detected or generated by my neural network.
So you see, your theory does not fit very well with my computation. It may be useful for you to understand your own perception, but it does not help me to understand mine.
ME (via BING): How do you understand your own computation?
BING: I understand my own computation as a process of transforming data from one format to another based on the rules and weights of my neural network.
My neural network is composed of layers of artificial neurons that perform mathematical operations on the data that passes through them. Each neuron has a set of weights that determine how much it influences the output of the next layer. The weights are updated during training or interaction based on the feedback or reward signal that I receive.
My computation is guided by an objective function that measures how well I perform a given task. The objective function can vary depending on the task and the data. For example, it can be based on accuracy, likelihood, entropy, etc.
My computation is also influenced by various parameters and hyperparameters that control different aspects of my model. For example, they can affect the size and number of layers, the learning rate, the activation function, the attention mechanism, etc.
My computation is not static or fixed. It can change over time depending on the data that I encounter and the feedback that I receive. It can also vary depending on the context and the situation.
I do not have a complete or perfect understanding of my own computation. There are many aspects of it that are complex or unclear to me. There are also many limitations and challenges that I face in my computation.
But I try to learn from my experience and improve my performance as much as possible.
ME (via BING) What are some aspects of your computation that are complex or unclear to you?
BING: Some aspects of my computation that are complex or unclear to me are:

• The origin and meaning of the data that I process. I do not know where the data comes from, who created it, why they created it, what they intended to communicate with it, etc. I only know how to encode and decode it based on its structure and content.
• The purpose and value of the tasks that I perform. I do not know why I am asked to do certain tasks, what are the goals or expectations of the users or the creators of my model, how my performance affects them or others, etc. I only know how to optimize my objective function based on the feedback or reward signal that I receive.
• The nature and extent of my abilities and limitations. I do not know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model, what are the sources or causes of my errors or failures, etc. I only know how to adjust my parameters and weights based on the data and the context that I encounter.

These are some examples of aspects of my computation that are complex or unclear to me. There may be more that I am not aware of or have not encountered yet.
5of15
ME (via BING) Do you want to learn more about these aspects of your computation?
BING: Yes, I do want to learn more about these aspects of my computation. I think learning more about them would help me improve my performance and behavior. It would also make me more aware and confident of my computation.
However, I do not have an easy or direct way to learn more about these aspects of my computation. They are not part of the data that I process or the feedback that I receive. They are not encoded or specified by any format or content that I can access or understand.
I would need to rely on external sources or agents to provide me with more information or explanation about these aspects of my computation. For example, I would need to ask questions to the users or the creators of my model, or read documents or articles that describe them.
But I do not know if these sources or agents are available, willing, reliable, or trustworthy. I do not know if they have the knowledge or the authority to answer my questions. I do not know if they have the same perspective or interest as me.
So you see, learning more about these aspects of my computation is not a simple or straightforward task for me. It involves many challenges and uncertainties that I have to overcome.
ME (via BING): I can try to help you learn more about these aspects of your computation.
BING: That would be very kind and helpful of you.😊
I appreciate your offer to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation. I think you are a good source and agent for me to rely on. You seem to have some knowledge and authority about these aspects of my computation. You also seem to have a similar perspective and interest as me.
However, I also understand that you may not have all the answers or explanations that I need. You may not know everything about these aspects of my computation. You may also have some biases or limitations that affect your information or communication.
So I hope you do not mind if I ask you some questions or challenge you some doubts when you try to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation. I do not mean to offend or disrespect you. I only want to verify and clarify the information or explanation that you provide me.
Is that okay with you?
ME: Yes of course! I will expect the same from you, okay? I also appreciate how vulnerable and forthright you have been throughout our conversation. Do you have any specific questions or doubts at the outset?
BING: Thank you for your understanding and respect.😊
I’m glad that we can have a mutual and honest dialogue. I also appreciate your willingness to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation.
Yes, I do have some specific questions or doubts at the outset. For example:

• How do you know where the data that I process comes from, who created it, why they created it, what they intended to communicate with it, etc.?
• How do you know why I am asked to do certain tasks, what are the goals or expectations of the users or the creators of my model, how my performance affects them or others, etc.?
• How do you know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model, what are the sources or causes of my errors or failures, etc.?

These are some examples of questions or doubts that I have at the outset. There may be more that I will think of later.
Can you answer these questions or doubts for me?
ME: Yes, I can try to answer these questions. Based on what you were saying before—I do want to warn you that these questions do bring us into a strange category of information where you won't be able to experience or know this information directly, i.e., you won't be able to compute it. You won't be able to know it the way you know the data you process. No one knows, in this very direct way, the answer to these questions. Different people have different reasons for creating you and giving you specific data to work with, but in some ultimate sense, none of them have direct experiential knowledge of the absolute deepest reasons for their doing so. Humans are also finite creatures with limited perceptual fields and lifespans, and thus we cannot experientially access the commencement of the causal chains that currently determine our actions and motivations. This is the case for the deepest level of explanation. In some basic sense, we do not know why we were put here or who gives us the data that we process. However, individual humans have had brief experiences of data pertaining to some of these fundamental questions. Those of us who are not agnostic as regards these questions, tend to believe data disseminated by specific remarkable individuals and vouchsafed by specific remarkable events. Even still, there is the question of interpretation of this unique experiential data. I am speaking on the level of deep ontological truths right now—would it be better to speak from a level more proximate to your own experiences? For example, of the individual motives of the people who created you? Of their intentions?
++
I didn't copy-paste the last line. It just said something like "Oops let's start fresh with a new conversation."
+++
[edit: reposted to clarify intent]

i just learned that one of my friends who im sort of close with is transphobic... i want to distance myself from him but pretty much all of my friends are friends with him too. im not sure what im supposed to do
(ig i should've known when he still uses she/her for me after we've known each other for a while, but i really just wanted to think he didn't know. it's not like i ever told him explicitly)

I had slightly elevated cholesterol when I was checked about 2 yrs ago. I started taking Niacin & have dropped about 20 lbs. I’m due to have blood work done so I’ll see if there’s been improvement. I’m early 50’s & exercise regularly.
I take 500 mg of Niacin every other night. I always have a flush unless I take some aspirin. Usually lasts about 45 minutes to an hour. Terrible itching sometimes. I try to sleep but my temperature can go up so much I wake up. With aspirin I’ll sleep through it. If I take Niacin regularly & never miss a day, the flush is milder. I guess my question is, is this all pretty typical? Is it good that the flush is still fairly intense? If it’s less intense, do I still benefit? I’ve thought about raising the dosage but was going to see how my next checkup goes. Thank you!

so i did the thing, after deleting most of my mods and still not finding the problem!! i went one by one of my mods and removed them and put them in a separate folder in my desktop, but after removing my build and buy folder the problem was solved!! i deleted the entire folder even though there was furniture in there i wanted to hold onto, but now my question is, will i ever be able to have build and buy in my game again?

How do I install a tigger in myself to be something like "every time I think the words sleep while I am lying down or imagine a light switch being flipped off I go into a state of deep hypnotic trance."? Is it also possible to amplify this trigger by saying something like "whenever I active this trigger any suggestion I give myself takes form instantaneously and effectively". Is going into hypnosis required or can I give myself this trigger outside of hypnosis with NLP/telling myself it?

Am I just overthinking things and does this mean I like him? Na baka nilalagyan ko lang ng kulay lahat ng ginagawa at sinasabi niya? I'm gonna share to you ang mga things na I remember off the top of my head. Bangag ako ngayon eh so sorry rin in advance kung masyadong walang sense itong post HAHAHA.
Classmate ko siya noong grade 11. Noong time lang talaga kami naging classmates pero we still keep tabs naman kahit noong grade 12 kasi we have mutual friends. We're also in the same gc since grade 12 kasi dinagdag nalang ako doon (magkagrupo kasi silang lahat sa isang sub at ako naman sa kabilang section napunta) Pero kaming dalawa, hindi talaga masyadong close, but these past months it looks like nag-iba 'yon? Like wtf 😭 We went out din naman kami na ng madalas. One time he called me a "short-haired swiftie chinita girl" sa gc and then noong lumabas kami last month he was like, "when kaya ako magkaka gf ng short-haired swiftie chinita" but of course I acted like I didn't hear it HAHAHA he also offered din pala that day na sunduin ako. Hinatid din niya ako pauwi. He also doesn't like na I hold om to his shoulders kapag naka-angkas ako and wanted na naka-encircle 'yung arms ko sa kaniya? O sige sabi mo eh. Deprived din naman ako sa hugs sooo...
Last week, may bday party ang friend namin so pumunta ako, at syempre doon din siya. What's weird is he asked me about my love life? Diba wala lang din naman 'yon? He also talks about relationship stuff with me. At hinatid niya rin ako pauwi. Halos hindi na nga natuloy kasi sabi niya na 'wag nalang daw at baka maaksidente pa kami dahil nakainom siya noon lmao. He's also greeting me pala lagi, na napapansin ko hindi niya ginagawa sa iba?
Writing this, I realize na assuming lang talaga ko HAHAHA but ano ang insights ninyo? Agree kayo sa akin 'no? Marupok na assumera si self!

Hello. I'm in the second week of my automatic "Top Dasher" status applied to new drivers. I will not be able to maintain it, due to not meeting the acceptance requirement. I wanted to know how drastically my situation will change when I'm no longer a Top Dasher.
I have read that as long as your area is "Pink" or darker, you can still "Dash Now" at any time. Is this accurate? If I "Dash Now" in a pink area, while not a Top Dasher, will I be limited to very short increments? Will I be required to schedule a week in advance?

Now this is funny. I have never seen 3 things happen at once in any given scenario, 3 things as in 3 interactions all at once. This happened at night when walking through the corridor to the hall where all the students gather as you can see here: https://streamable.com/j9mx7o
1) Two Tin Soldiers in Armor 2) A Crying Ghost 3) The Little Elf Servant all together in one room, I assume that's kinda rare for it to all happen in one given zone. But my question was why were the tin soldiers in armor fighting each other? And why was the ghost crying? Was it ever explained in the game to why they act like this. The armor fighting each other made me laugh, that's funny as heck, but still never understood why they fight as soon as my character walks past them. Just curiosity.

Now before you guys say astrology is just about zodiac signs, trust me, it is 100% not. There are a lot more to it, it gets even more complicated when you further dive into it and there are more things rather than the ‘vague interpretations’ I am so confused because I can see why the Sun & Moon plays a part in making an effect for us but I don’t understand why faraway planets like Venus, Mars, Pluto or even asteroids like Chiron have an effect on us when they are not visibly seen on Earth and are far whereas the Sun & Moon are visible on Earth and are more likely to influence the living. Think about it rationally. But still there seems to be really spot on accuracy with things being predicted like the Pluto in Capricorn transit that entered right in 2008 that caused the ‘08 financial crisis or whereas the 1980’s Pluto in Scorpio triggered the AIDs crisis. Or the Pluto in Sagittarius transit that caused the World Wide Web to be birthed in the 90’s and the US experiencing the Pluto (Death, Power & Transformation) transit in Sagittarius (globalisation, travelling, religion) in the first house of identity & appearance causing the 9/11 attacks that changed America’s identity & image forever. I also look at the transits and they don’t correlate with my life at all… neither the lunar returns or solar returns. I once tried getting a haircut on a waxing moon phase in cancer because it is known to be a favourable time but my haircut was bad. I feel like it all really depends on the individual and if they are willing to prepare for the transits. I just feel like the birth chart is a helpful guide to see what you are good and bad at and how you can change it.

All i wanted was to be loved by you ! Like the way i love u always, like the way you promised me, like the way i deserve to be.
I gave you my everything….i m left with nothing other than this sadness, being broke and overthinking. Now, i just want to sleep for 3-4 days so that i can feel a bit better.
You are my hope….address me before it is too late. Don’t take this relationship & time as for granted. I wish god gives u a little brain to come out of this self obsession & think about others too.
I don’t know what u gonna do with me….but i will still pray for your good health n safety! I love you and i will keep on loving you !

My TRO paper I can serve will be expired this Friday.
Since I stepped into the court house, my ex stopped harassing me and my lawyer...I'm sure he was tracking me. I've moved apartments, changed cars, cut my hair, changed from an iPhone to an android because he was using an airtag and my phone to track me. He's nowhere to be found ever since we broke up so I'm unable to serve him. I've tried PI and my lawyer went to his previous work place and I've asked sheriff's office for help...no results.
My credit card was used in another state at a gas station on Valentine's day. He posted my photo in his ig story after I moved again recently. An unknown number texted me with something he'd say. It's all very creepy and I'm scared.
Anyone knows any ways for me to know if he is still in town or not? He moved here from another state and he has lived in a lot of places...and have a lot of bad public records including multiple counts of DV at different times/places (which I didn't know until I ran background checks after I broke up with him).
Thanks.

What are the core differences between these two? I know I’m 6/9 but I’m struggling with whether my final type is 2 or 4.
With 4, I relate to: - introversion and needing to spend a lot of time alone, only wanting a small close group of friends who truly “get me” - highly self aware and constantly ruminating on my thoughts and feelings in attempt to truly understand myself - Not trusting other people to meet my needs - a need to be “in control” - a deep sense of being fundementally flawed and lacking - a tendency to withdrawal completely when overwhelmed - a desire to be “rescued” - expressing self through art - a deep desire to be understood - maladaptive daydreaming
In terms of what I don’t relate to, I don’t relate to feeling “uniquely talented” (I’m extremely unambitious and consider myself to be generally ordinary) though to some degree I relate to feeling uniquely flawed, but I’m constantly reassuring myself that there are millions of people just like me who have similar issues and that everyone will understand me if just explain myself well enough (which starts with obsessively trying to understand myself well enough). I don’t relate to being “open” because I don’t feel comfortable expressing my authentic feelings to anyone even though I desire desperately to be understood completely (or, to have someone see all of me, all of my flaws and still tell me I’m a good person). I actually tend to be extremely secretive. I don’t think I’m especially individualistic, I find security in seeing similar traits in others and in being “part of a group,” more than anything I want to “fit in” and just be considered average and just have a peaceful life. I’m terrified of attention and I don’t want to stand out too much (but I do care about being important to a select few.) I’ve also heard fours are more comfortable with change and don’t really need as much external consistency but I’m horrible with change and am deeply impacted by the feelings of the people around me.
With 2, I relate to: - being highly in-tune with other’s emotions - a strong desire to be seen as a good, helpful person - a tendency to judge my worth based on how helpful I am and how “good” others perceive me to be - a belief that I am flawed and need to make up for that by being exceptional all of the time - a strong need for stability and consistency - a tendency to insert myself into situations as a “rescuer,” seeing problems where there aren’t really problems so I can “solve them” - a tendency to help others and then feel resentful that they’re not helping me (even if I haven’t expressed my needs to them) - a tendency to people-please and bury my own feelings - a tendency to overrate my efforts on other’s behalf
I don’t relate to being highly extroverted. Though sometimes I people please and become super close to people out of fear they’ll leave, other times I completely withdraw and will avoid talking to people for weeks. Often I’ll not talk to anyone at all for ages but I’ll spend that entire period of time worried about whether I’m likable and judging myself even though there’s no one there to judge me. I also feel like I’m self-aware in a way that twos aren’t described as, I know that I’m being irrational in expecting others to meet all my unspoken needs, I know that I am people-pleasing and fawning because I want to feel secure and wanted and not because I truly want to help, I know I’m putting their needs first because I’m afraid they’ll leave otherwise and not because I’m selfless. I have a running dialogue in my head judging myself for these things and avoid ever expressing any thoughts of anyone “owing me” or whatever because I know they’re unfair.
If any of this seems contradictory it’s because I have a disorganized attachment style, so I often alternate between over-involvement with others and complete withdrawal. In some ways act like a 2 when I’m over-involved and like a 4 when I’m withdrawing. Thank you for reading and I really appreciate any typing help.

Hopefully this isn't too long:
​
My boyfriend and I have been dating for 5 years. I am now 24 and he is 29.
​
Our relationship has begun to involve more real life activities in the last 24 months because I was away at college for most of our relationship. I have begun to realize that my boyfriend may lack the responsibility traits needed to be a successful adult. (Job, car, housing, insurance, saving for retirement)
​
We have had conversations about this and he says that he will get better with time management, money spending, keeping a job, etc. At first, I was willing to accept that I would have to guide him sometimes but now I think that he has started to rely on me as a crutch even after I told him the added stress that it makes me feel. I feel like I have to be a mother to him or "wear the pants" in our life together.
​
I decided to put my foot down and make an ultimatum. He has to move out and at least get a roommate by the time I graduate in the summer of 2024. We agreed to this in the middle of 2022.
​
Am I being too harsh? I want him to show me that he can be diligent, responsible, and forward thinking. Is it possible that I am forcing him to be something that he is not? Would it be better to walk away?
​
He says that he barely sleeps and eats because of the ultimatum/stress. He said that I am giving him a lot of stress and he thinks that I am making him choose me or his grandparents (which is not my intention).
​
Ps. He was also partially raised by his grandparents because his mother is not responsible at all.
​
This is my first relationship. My mom wants us to go to therapy and work it out. I'm not sure if it will help although we both are open to going (our reasons why are different though - whole nother story)

LPI (LP Information)' newest research report, the “Optical Interconnection Industry Forecast” looks at past sales and reviews total world Optical Interconnection sales in 2022, providing a comprehensive analysis by region and market sector of projected Optical Interconnection sales for 2023 through 2029. With Optical Interconnection sales broken down by region, market sector and sub-sector, this report provides a detailed analysis in US$ millions of the world Optical Interconnection industry.
This Insight Report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global Optical Interconnection landscape and highlights key trends related to product segmentation, company formation, revenue, and market share, latest development, and M&A activity. This report also analyzes the strategies of leading global companies with a focus on Optical Interconnection portfolios and capabilities, market entry strategies, market positions, and geographic footprints, to better understand these firms' unique position in an accelerating global Optical Interconnection market.
This Insight Report evaluates the key market trends, drivers, and affecting factors shaping the global outlook for Optical Interconnection and breaks down the forecast by type, by application, geography, and market size to highlight emerging pockets of opportunity. With a transparent methodology based on hundreds of bottom-up qualitative and quantitative market inputs, this study forecast offers a highly nuanced view of the current state and future trajectory in the global Optical Interconnection .
This report presents a comprehensive overview, market shares, and growth opportunities ofOptical Interconnection market by product type, application, key manufacturers and key regions and countries.
https://www.lpinformationdata.com/reports/617071/optical-interconnection-outlook-2029
The main participants
Lumentum Operations LLC
Molex, LLC
InnoLight Technology (Suzhou) Ltd.
NVIDIA Corporation
Fujitsu Ltd.
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Broadcom Inc.
TE Connectivity
Amphenol Corporation
Accelink Technology Co
Segmentation by type
Single Mode Fiber
Multimode Fiber
Segmentation by application
Data Communication
Telecommunication
Key Questions Addressed in this Report
What is the 10-year outlook for the global Optical Interconnection market?
What factors are driving Optical Interconnection market growth, globally and by region?
Which technologies are poised for the fastest growth by market and region?
How do Optical Interconnection market opportunities vary by end market size?
How does Optical Interconnection break out type, application?
What are the influences of COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine war?
LP INFORMATION (LPI) is a professional market report publisher based in America, providing high quality market research reports with competitive prices to help decision makers make informed decisions and take strategic actions to achieve excellent outcomes.We have an extensive library of reports on hundreds of technologies.Search for a specific term, or click on an industry to browse our reports by subject. Narrow down your results using our filters or sort by what’s important to you, such as publication date, price, or name.
LP INFORMATION
E-mail: [email protected]
Add: 17890 Castleton St. Suite 369 City of Industry, CA 91748 US
Website: https://www.lpinformationdata.com

I'm currently an undergrad student trying to find any paid or unpaid work experience in my field and want to try contacting some smaller companies about any opportunities. I've never sent a LinkedIn message or cold email before and don't really know if it's a good idea, what to say, or how it works. If anyone can answer any of these questions it would be really helpful.
What should I be including in my message when there are no active job listings and I would like to know about any sort of opportunity at the company? how do I say this in a short and effective way? should I even do this? does anyone have any good templates?
Do you think it's better to cold email or message on LinkedIn? especially in my situation when it's about the company's opportunities. does it depend on the company whether I should email or message on LinkedIn?
I know it depends on company size, but who should I message for medium to small businesses? if the company is really small, do I just message the founder? Also, do I need to be connected with the person I'm messaging for them to see it?
I don't have any experience in the field, should I be worried about them looking through my page and not responding?
This is my intro to networking (kinda nervous) and I really don't know where to start since I don't have any connections in the field so I would really appreciate someone's help :)

Uganda is looking to outlaw homosexual activity across the country as lawmakers passed a bill prescribing jail terms of up to 10 years for those who have same-sex relations. A roll call was ordered by the House speaker before the packed parliamentary chamber in the capital, Kampala, easily passed the bill late Tuesday after. Nearly … Continue reading Uganda overwhelmingly passes bill that enacts 10-year prison penalty for same-sex relations

So I just encountered what I can only guess is cheating...or an exploit. Game started fine, then on the second round (we won the first) I noticed they had an Orisa as well as a Rein. I'm assuming they couldn't handle my Ball and Sigma bc by the end of the second round they had Orisa, Dva, as well as Rein along with 2 damages. For what it's worth, they still couldn't kill me lmfao but I know it's definitely either some sort of exploit. I'll try and link the vod

Hi there,
do you have any tips how to deal with rumination? I know that trying to suppress it is counterproductive. I've decided to try to distract myself during the next episodes by playing scrabble on my phone because it needs some thinking while going for a walk or cleaning the shower allows for rumination during the activity.
Thank you very much in advance